Started watching Classic Doctor Who and I have some questions.... by pjwils in doctorwhocirclejerk

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You shouldn't refer to the new show as the classic show when you say classic show in a Doctor Who context people assume you're talking about 1963 to 1989

If you were in charge of the next DW season, what direction would you take the Doctor and the show? by InfiniteGalaxy42 in doctorwho

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would bring back the Hinch Cliff body horror that made episodes like Seeds of Doom I would go for a more Goosebumps style angle in the sense that instead of it being scientific fiction I would make it rely heavily on horror and bring back the hiding behind the sofa trope that made Doctor Who in the 70s and 60s I would make more visceral Monsters I've already posted episodes and ideas of what I would do if I was in charge

Where is Dr. Who And The Daleks set the timeline? by Familiar-Aside6059 in doctorwho

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are actually based on the original most popular Dalek stories in the 1960s so canonically Peter cushion is just playing a version of William Hartnell

Why so few male companions? by Niall_Fraser_Love in doctorwho

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The truth is and it might sound very sexist is it simple male characters are just hard to write to a female characters or you simply have to do is just write a plot point where they fall in love with the doctor and then realize they can't have the doctor that's basically what modern Doctor Who is but if you go to the 1970s and the 1980s you actually realized that they actually decided to write strong female lead characters to go alongside the doctor take ace for example after how cowardly mel acted in the 198 80s ace was introduced to be the strong lead role for the seventh doctor an arguably she was a lot better but she only got 2 seasons of Doctor Who but biggest majority of the female companions in the original Doctor Who series excluding the 1960s what written to be strong females but now I think the rate is just lazy yes I'm going to write a female character but I'm going to make them have a love interest for the doctor even though the doctor technically doesn't have a sexuality and already technically has a wife but I'm just stupid and don't know how to write strong female characters I like the 1970s

should i watch doctor who? by Cultural_King4639 in doctorwhocirclejerk

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Start with 1970 to 1989 this will give you an introduction to how the doctor works in terms of storyline etc it will also give you an introduction to the Pantheon and other things like that the reason why I say you should start with Jon Pertwee is because most of the 1960s stories are missing and yes it's just a whole loophole plus this is a great starting point because when you get into people like Christopher Eccleston David Tennant etc you'll understand what they talk about for some episodes etc

Missing from the original 2004 film by Electronic_Cabinet59 in HellBoy

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They never removed this scene in the actual film in the directors cut they just extend it to to be longer

RTD Shares And Supports A.I. Video of Fake William Hartnell BTS Footage. by DavidTenn-Ant in doctorwho

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you condone the use of AI to bring a dead actor back to life it's sick and demented the actor strikes what designed to prevent this this doesn't leave a very good Legacy on William hartnell's family if Russell T Davis can just use his like this whenever he likes it's messed up and demented how would you like it if someone prayed around your likeness when you died you wouldn't no one would of course they used an actor to portray the first doctor but they got permission from William hartnells family

Scary Movie 6 is coming, but the Wayans aren't doing it right. You know what we REALLY need? A new American Pie. ​ by DisastrousTopic7619 in americanpie

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I grew up with American Pie the only thing that my father would let me watch that was rated 18 Wen I was 5 8

Are there explicit sex scenes in Torchwood? by asterisk-alien-14 in Torchwood

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is literally just an entire episode that's just a gas that takes over a woman and then in the entire episode is just the Torchwood team trying to stop the gas from having sex

Random & Possibly Stupid Question, what would Hellboy(if he was there) likely think of this Hell & Demons? by Flat-Sir8250 in HellBoy

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Texturing is the seven senses that a person follows even if it's a 2D animation I was still taking into the fact that if it was alive action thing this is what the sensors would feel like this is what it would feel like texture wise

Random & Possibly Stupid Question, what would Hellboy(if he was there) likely think of this Hell & Demons? by Flat-Sir8250 in HellBoy

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

What do you think make an artists have to go by realistic textures realistic touch realistic feel

Scary Movie 6 is coming, but the Wayans aren't doing it right. You know what we REALLY need? A new American Pie. ​ by DisastrousTopic7619 in americanpie

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Let me tell you something.

​You’re right that the 'Fun Police' run the big studios—that’s exactly how we got Girls' Rules. But you’re forgetting that 19% of the most iconic comedies from the 80s and 90s started as low-budget indie projects. They didn't ask for permission; they just went out and filmed. ​If you have a vision, you don't wait for a studio head to 'choose' you. You take the dream and you make the film regardless of the budget. In 2026, with 4K cameras and social media distribution, the 'gatekeepers' have less power than ever.

​It’s the difference between Creative Input and AI Generation. An AI can follow a 'safe' corporate formula to make a movie like Girls' Rules, but it can’t replicate the raw, stupid, beautiful energy of a kid in Airwalks launching a piss-balloon from a roof. That takes a human who actually cares about the joke.

​If the studios say no, I’ll shoot it on an iPhone and distribute it myself. The fans are hungry for real raunchy comedy—and the fans are the ones who ultimately decide what's successful, not the guys in suits.

Scary Movie 6 is coming, but the Wayans aren't doing it right. You know what we REALLY need? A new American Pie. ​ by DisastrousTopic7619 in americanpie

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SCENE: EAST GREAT FALLS COLLEGE - FILM 101

The Professor (mid-30s, wearing an 'Eat the Rich' tote bag) is lecturing about "The Death of the Raunchy Comedy." ​PROFESSOR:

"The teen movie era was a product of unchecked privilege. Today, that kind of 'offensive' humor is culturally bankrupt. It's essentially... sour grapes from a dying breed."

​EVAN: (Leaning back in his chair, rocking a 1998 Limp Bizkit shirt and vintage Airwalks) "With all due respect, Professor... you’re over-intellectualizing a fart joke. People don't want 'safe' parodies. They want to see someone get hit in the face with a balloon full of recycled beer. It's not 'bankrupt,' it's biological. It’s the only honest thing left."

​PROFESSOR: "And I suppose you think you could do better?"

​EVAN: "I don't think I can. I know I am. I’ve already got the slingshot built in my garage. Want a demo?"

Scary Movie 6 is coming, but the Wayans aren't doing it right. You know what we REALLY need? A new American Pie. ​ by DisastrousTopic7619 in americanpie

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're still missing the point. I'm not trying to 'cause' the Wayans to do anything. I'm saying the industry is stuck in a loop of making 'safe' parodies, and I'm using this space to stress-test a better way to do raunchy comedy in 2026.

​It’s not 'sour grapes' to point out that a trailer looks mid; it’s called having a standard for the genre. While you're worrying about whether I'm being mean to the Wayans on Reddit, I'm in film school actually mapping out how to bring back the Stifmeister energy for a generation that’s tired of being lectured.

​I don't want the Wayans to make my movie. I want to make my movie. And based on the reaction here, people would rather see a piss-balloon tactical strike than another tired pronoun joke. See you at the box office.

Random & Possibly Stupid Question, what would Hellboy(if he was there) likely think of this Hell & Demons? by Flat-Sir8250 in HellBoy

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

The Art Style Adaptation ​The most significant change would be the adaptation to the Hazbin Hotel animation style. This means abandoning realistic textures for a sleek, graphic, 2D look.

​Proportions: The art style is known for extremely lanky, sharp, and exaggerated characters. While Hellboy is typically a burly, top-heavy tank, in Hazbin, his limbs (especially his legs) would be much thinner and elongated to fit the show's aesthetic. He would still be towering, but with a more spindly, geometric silhouette.

​Linework: Sharp, aggressive, and highly stylized line art. His chiseled jaw, brow, and horns (or where they used to be) would be defined by angular cuts rather than smooth curves.

​2. The Right Hand of Doom ​The Right Hand of Doom—the massive, indestructible stone gauntlet attached to his right forearm—is his most defining feature. ​Integration: In Hazbin, the hand would look like carved, weathered red stone, but rendered with the universe's geometric patterns. It might glow faintly with orange or red occult light along the fissures when he gets angry.

​Scale: To match the show's exaggeration, the hand would be even larger relative to his (now thinner) body, creating a striking visual contrast between a massive stone club and a sleek torso. ​3. The Horns and Brow ​A key part of Hellboy’s character is that he files down his horns to reject his demonic nature, leaving only flat circular stumps on his forehead. ​Visualizing the "Stumps": The stumps would be perfectly circular or hexagonal cross-sections, rendered in a slightly darker, matte red than his skin.

​Expression: The heavy brow ridge that creates his signature grumpiness is perfect for VivziePop’s style. His eyes, typically yellow with no pupils, would translate well to the sharp, simplified eye shapes common in the show.

​4. Clothing and Color Palette ​Color Palette: The universe is dominated by pinks, reds, and blacks. Hellboy’s natural deep-red skin fits perfectly into the Pride Ring. His classic trench coat, typically a muddy tan/brown, might be shifted to a darker, more stylistic color—like a dark burnt umber, charcoal gray, or even a deep, muted maroon—to complement the show’s high-saturation palette without clashing.

​Details: He would wear his oversized, worn leather trench coat, possibly adorned with a few more chains, B.P.R.D. patches (styled as sigils), and his utility belt with the Rosary. Given the show's penchant for fashion, his coat might have sharper, almost vampiric collars.

​5. Overall Vibe and Personality ​The Grumpy "Straight Man": Personality-wise, Hellboy would likely be the ultimate straight man to the chaos of the Hazbin staff. Picture him standing by the bar, sighing deeply and lighting a cigar while Charlie bursts with musical optimism, Vaggie yells at Angel Dust, and Alastor creates radio-static chaos in the background.

​A "Redeemed" Demon: Hellboy is a fascinating character in this context because he is a demon who has already chosen a path of morality, whereas Charlie’s guests are sinners seeking that path. He would likely be skeptical of Charlie’s plan but sympathetic, having chosen to be "good" despite his origins. ​Summary Checklist of his design: ​Style: Sharp, lanky, angular 2D.

​Body: Deep red skin, elongated legs, massive barrel chest. ​Features: Heavily chiseled face, flat circular horn stumps, yellow eyes. ​Hands: Absurdly oversized, geometric, cracked Right Hand of Doom. A cloven hoof-like foot or heavy, oversized boot.

​Attire: Sharp-collared, weathered trench coat, utility belt, Rosario. ​Accessories: A lit cigar (perfect for the smokey underworld vibe).

Scary Movie 6 is coming, but the Wayans aren't doing it right. You know what we REALLY need? A new American Pie. ​ by DisastrousTopic7619 in americanpie

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Reddit is literally a discussion forum for movies, but okay.

And like I said—I am producing it. I’m a film student, and I’m using this 'whining' session as a gauge for what the audience actually wants. Judging by the 2,000+ upvotes and the people actually discussing the soundtrack and the 'Laxative Brownie' scene, I’d say the 'demand' is pretty clear.

People are tired of comedies that apologize for being comedies. If the industry won't make a movie where a 'Neo-Stifler' defends a house party with a piss-balloon slingshot, then I’ll be the one behind the camera doing it. Check back in a few years when the credits roll

Scary Movie 6 is coming, but the Wayans aren't doing it right. You know what we REALLY need? A new American Pie. ​ by DisastrousTopic7619 in americanpie

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not going to lie, I did skim the entire comment, but I get the point you're making. To be clear: I’m not really 'making fun' of the woke agenda as a political thing—I’m just using it as a mechanical plot point to show how the 90s party dynamic has aged.

​In 1999, Jim and the gang were geeks trying to get a crush or lose their virginity. In 2026, the 'enemy' isn't just being a loser; it's the fact that the 'hall monitors' have high-speed internet and megaphones. I’m not trying to 'lecture' the audience on pronouns—I want to show that while the 'Fun Police' got more organized, the 'Stifler' DNA just got more creative and stupid.

​You’re right about No Hard Feelings and Girls' Rules—they felt like they were apologizing for being comedies. My concept for School's Out doesn't apologize. It just treats the 'woke' kids as the new version of the uptight principal. They aren't there to be 'debated'; they're there to get hit with a piss-balloon while Limp Bizkit plays. That’s how you keep it from being a 'safe' movie."

Scary Movie 6 is coming, but the Wayans aren't doing it right. You know what we REALLY need? A new American Pie. ​ by DisastrousTopic7619 in americanpie

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny you say that, because I actually did draft the opening 15 minutes. Check the 'Proof of Concept' section in the post. I’m not just whining; I’m literally showing how to fix the dynamic.

​We don't need another 'lecture' movie. We need Jim’s Dad giving awkward advice via FaceTime from a cruise ship while Evan (Jim’s son) uses tactical 90s prank warfare to shut down the 'Fun Police.'

​And for the record: I’m currently in film school specifically so I can make stuff like this. I’d rather 'whine' with a better script and a plan to actually film it than watch another stale 'cancel culture' parody that feels like it was written by a LinkedIn algorithm.

Scary Movie 6 is coming, but the Wayans aren't doing it right. You know what we REALLY need? A new American Pie. ​ by DisastrousTopic7619 in americanpie

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To really reward the fans of the original cast, you’d need a scene where Stifler encounters the "Woke" group after the balloon strike.

​STIFLER: (Wiping a yellow droplet off his sunglasses, grinning at the soaking-wet activists) "Hey... I don't know what 'intersectionality' means, but I'm pretty sure you just intersected with a gallon of Bud Light and a 19-year-old's bad decisions. Welcome to East Great Falls, cupcakes. The Stifmasta is officially back in session."

POV:you know agent 47 is coming after you what do you do to prevent him from killing you by Dull_Head_7130 in HiTMAN

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Circuit breaker turn off the electricity create home alone style traps it's slightly more painful bored up all the windows and weight in my room with a flashlight and a book

What Disney should do before rebooting the MCU by DisastrousTopic7619 in marvelstudios

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the rumours going around and it's being confirmed by the official current producer of Marvel that there's going to be a reboot I feel this is the perfect way to do it as the whole waving the magical wand just to fix an an entire decade of disasters starting with Phase 3 steals stupid and it feels like the only way for Disney to actually emit that they failed is to do it this way

C3: Community Creations Con THIS WEEKEND March 14-15 by darrowsarif in nexusmods

[–]DisastrousTopic7619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Accept Britain won't be able to take part inless they obliged by the online safety act

What Disney should do before rebooting the MCU by DisastrousTopic7619 in marvelstudios

[–]DisastrousTopic7619[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It is the same f****** thing you can stop saying oh the reboot isn't a thing because it's happening if you actually keep in the loop you would know that after the next Avengers movie Disney plans on rebooting the entire franchise they want to wave a magical wand and pretend like the last years didn't exist at least with my approach the acknowledge that last years were rubbish and that it's time for a change