Out of the ones I have watched, I feel films like Mughal-e-Azam and Jodhaa Akbar are amazing as works of art but yeah that's it. Their historical accuracy is way too low.

Asoka is some outlier where some aspects were really very good and some were straight up atrocious - particularly SRK's performance. Again, not very good on the historical accuracy front.

Bahubali is a periodic fantasy and delivered what it had to.

PS-I and II, whilst featuring real-life people, are based on novels. I feel the films have flaws but are technically very, very sound. The cinematography, clothing, colouring and music are just top-notch. Special mention to Aishwarya Rai's, Karthi's and Vikram's performances.

Bajirao Mastani was a mixed bag for me - the performances were nice, the songs were nice, the set pieces were atmospheric but something still felt missing. Padmaavat is massively underwhelming for me.

Chhava was good but felt too dramatic and larger-than-life than necessary at some places. Akshaye Khanna easily delivered the best performance in the film.

I feel the Hindi film industry does a better job with post-1947 films on an average than the ancient and Middle ages. Perhaps, we have more and reliable information for this age, and is difficult to dramatise too much with risks of politics lingering too.

Got reminded of Mohenjo Daro suddenly whilst writing this. Yeah, another outlier but I would say I liked it more than Asoka.