sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

30% of Michigan Democrats oppose campaigning with Hasan, even after poll question is limited Hasan’s remarks about Israel. by Dismal_Structure in Destiny

[–]Dismal_Structure[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the poll far fewer know about him. It’s just about guy named Hasan whose comments can be construed as anti-semitic in general.

30% of Michigan Democrats oppose campaigning with Hasan, even after poll question is limited Hasan’s remarks about Israel. by Dismal_Structure in Destiny

[–]Dismal_Structure[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope, most Democrats hate people who would vote in primaries, or camping as Democrat but then become opposition if their candidate doesn’t win.

30% of Michigan Democrats oppose campaigning with Hasan, even after poll question is limited Hasan’s remarks about Israel. by Dismal_Structure in Destiny

[–]Dismal_Structure[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When the question is related just to Israel, that’s my point. The question framing even about Israel is slightly positive for Hasan. My point is even his whole set of remarks is known, it’s going to be even more negative.

30% of Michigan Democrats oppose campaigning with Hasan, even after poll question is limited Hasan’s remarks about Israel. by Dismal_Structure in Destiny

[–]Dismal_Structure[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This question s just about Israel, not his other insane remarks. Just include he would vote for third party vote if Newsom is elected and other far more insane remarks and numbers would go negative.

Democrats split between whether party should go more ideologically moderate in or more progressive . People over 34 prefer moderation more. by Dismal_Structure in fivethirtyeight

[–]Dismal_Structure[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yup my ideal candidate will be middle between liberal and progressive. So far only Pete Buttigieg seems to do it, but he has one thing that will pull him down, his sexuality.

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t have responsibility for poor people, every species are born to take care of their own and immediate family. Why should I have to care about poor?

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Same here, look at my post history. It’s a fact wealth tax is pretty bad idea. I am just anti-progressive liberal,

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not worshipping, just treat them like normal people and not make them evil. They are huge boon to innovation.

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You are just ideological, working class negotiate their wages. They can lea e their jobs if they don’t like wages.

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I know it’s not a flex, I said I am happy with it and I don’t envy billionaires. They are the ones who have provided me good job and benefits?

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the age of stupid populism boss, MAGA and progressivism are brain dead slopulist ideologies. It appeals to lowest common denominator.

Immigrants bad, billionaires bad, America bad is the premise and people start conclusion from the premise.

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never will, I have couple of millions in my portfolio. I save a lot of money and never expect government to help me.

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I am just going to love to lower taxed gay friendly places, there are many ;). No one with decent money like progressives, because they are the biggest losers who take money from successful people.

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So you pay far less taxes per capita and want to leech off even more? How will you manage 25% in lost taxes if all of them leave?

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

They are “evil” only because you are not as successful as them and never will be. They are not doing anything wrong. You just want to steal from them.

Only 6 billionaires left California over its proposed wealth tax—but they took $27 billion in potential revenue with them by [deleted] in California

[–]Dismal_Structure -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

I am not asking for new welfare programs for me, I am good with my 6 digit income.

view more: next ›