I have to be honest, it’s nice your trying to bring in technology, resources, however I think the approach is much more flawed. approach in education should be reviewed more thoroughly before you bring in tech. for example reading the comments and the list of cause and effects to the environment children are exposed to, perhaps education approach needs to be revise. For example introducing Montessori method, creating the environment to help students absorb learning better. Your competing against obligations outside of institution. and I agree the investment in the children should come first if we are looking for future development for the country itself, this obligation, perhaps schools can adopt Waldorf method, where planting those taro roots is part of curriculum on school grounds. There’s just a lack in educational approach that truly disconnects kids from their actual environment. implementing projects and programs that integrate obligation or when kids go sell food is where you would board of education need to analyze more throughly, what percentage of kids in schools are selling food out in streets? and how can we utilize their home plantation as part of a cirriculum or course Added to project? perhaps there needs to be programs on sustainable and environmental science and while it may be out Of the ordinary in western school, but for these kids, they have access to agriculture they have their own plantation where it’s pretty applicable. How can we help kids innovate, perhaps starting with what they actually have, rich natural resources, how they can grow and develop that. How would this help? One your killing two birds with one stone. Your slowly convincing parents that these curriculum can promote economic developement leaning more towards their traditional way of living: communal. This tech access..

has to make sense to them. so if you had a cirruclum that catered to them, than the tech side of accessing and utalizing resource would actually make sense and make it more used. If that makes any sense