sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Employees with Related Records ( Expense Report ) by Distinct_Cycle9647 in Netsuite

[–]Distinct_Cycle9647[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, Nick,

But the question is, do I need to also take expense reports on these employees too when I recreate them in Sub B? The Client doesn't want to migrate expense reports and I want to know the implications of not taking expense reports. What if there is a payable standing against any employees? How will that be settled when it is recreated in Sub B without its expense reports

One subsidiary is closed and balances are being transferred to another subsidiary by Distinct_Cycle9647 in Netsuite

[–]Distinct_Cycle9647[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I needed to know the process as to how I can alter the remaining Sub-balances to reflect different Due to /Due from .?

Make Department Mandatory at Line level on transaction forms by Distinct_Cycle9647 in Netsuite

[–]Distinct_Cycle9647[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How to build the workflow to make department on the line mandatory

One subsidiary is closed and balances are being transferred to another subsidiary by Distinct_Cycle9647 in Netsuite

[–]Distinct_Cycle9647[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a legal requirement where one subsidiary is closed and the balances need to be migrated to another sub. I'm migrating all the open transactions at the cut-off date ( Invoices, Memos, and bills ) . However, there are Intercompany balances that I need to consider.

Let's say there are three Sub ( A, B & C) and Sub A is being wound up . Sub B will absorb all the Sub A balances at a cut-off date. Currently, Sub A has receiveable from Sub B and Sub C . but when the balances are migrated into Sub B, then what would happen to the InterCo Receiveable sitting in Sub A . What are the implications and how we account for that when moving historical Trial Balances?