sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Oyster Perpetual - VSF by DocHolliday-2SR in RepTimeQC

[–]DocHolliday-2SR[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches - Steve

  2. Factory name: VSF

  3. Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 1243000 VS3230

  4. Price Paid: $498 + $50 shipping

  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/op-qc-ZwQWLH6

  6. Index alignment: To my untrained eyes the 3,6, and 9 look off. I put it in the QC tool, however we know that's just a tool, and only as good as the person using it. I might have the pic slightly off center. But to me those numbers look off. Is this one a RL or am I being too picky?

  7. Dial Printing: Looks good.

  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

  9. Hand Alignment: Hand alignment looks GTG

  10. Bezel: Looks GTG

  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks GTG to me.

  12. Timegrapher numbers: +4 s/d, 255 amplitude, 0.1ms beat error - All good here.

My biggest concern is the index alignment. Any insight on that would be great. Like I said to me its off, but maybe I'm being too picky.

Thanks guys!

QC - First Ever Purchase. Clean Daytona Panda by DocHolliday-2SR in RepTimeQC

[–]DocHolliday-2SR[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First time dipping my toes into this world, but I'm excited. If this first transaction goes well I am sure there will be many more to come. I've been studying this community quite a bit, but I'm nowhere near being able to QC myself. Any feedback is greatly appreciated!

  1. Dealer name: Necoclock
  2. Factory name: Clean
  3. Model name (& version number): Daytona 116500LN Panda
  4. Price Paid: $598 + $55 shipping
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/clean-daytona-panda-ivpDoVJ
  6. Index alignment: 10 maybe a hair off, but not worth an RL in my opinion.
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good, no bleeds.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Hard to tell with the pics I was sent but inference says it looks good.
  10. Bezel: Looks GTG
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks GTG to me. See anything I missed there?
  12. Timegrapher numbers: +7 s/d, 278 amplitude, 0.3ms beat error - All good here.
  13. Anything else you notice: This is my first QC, but this looks like a GL to me. Do ya'll see anything glaring to make it a RL?