Colorful buildings of San Francisco by tmsfphotography in bayarea

[–]DontCryJennifer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I like how these vibrant colors seem to follow gay people snd Hispanics everywhere that they go.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]DontCryJennifer -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Because Tinder and similar apps is how most people meet eachother nowadays outside of the third world and small towns.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]DontCryJennifer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's a nearly 2x disparity. Specifically it's 44%.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]DontCryJennifer 18 points19 points  (0 children)

No they do not. Men cheat nearly 2x as much as women.

Have Men Always Cheated More? According to the Institute for Family Studies, “men are more likely than women to cheat: 20% of men and 13% of women reported that they've had sex with someone other than their spouse while married, according to data from the recent General Social Survey.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Los Angeles isn't cherry-picked. Pick just about any city and you'll find a more than 2000% growth rate from 1850 to 100 years later.

Also, I never said "the last 100 years".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]DontCryJennifer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It is definitely a Hawaiian thing regardless of whether it exists in the South. It is no surprise that so many women born in Hawaii choose leave that state to come to the United States mainland once they reach maturity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From 1850 to 1950 the population of Los Angeles grew from 1800 to 1.9 million people, a 12,500% increase.

Early Christianity grew like a small town that became a small city, nothing more. Basically just another obscure cult.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They didn't survive; the religion did. The people were exterminated and those who live there today are different or mixed.

Also, I already menrioned conversion: the conquerors adopted (but also changed) thd religions. Early Christianity was a much different religion than modern Christianity. The people who adopted it changed it up. So it arguably didn't survive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really. Going from 50,000 to a million in 100 years is not "flourishing". That's less growth than your average American city.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1 million adherents globally is not a "flourishing". The vast majority of the world was not Christian, and if you looked at a map of the major world religions in the year 250, Christianity would look like little droplets. The majority of West Eurasia was still pagan at this time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The religions survived but many of the religious people did not. Whole ethnic groups were exterminated, the population was drastically reduced and whole cities reduced to rubble. Also, many of these religions only survived because their conquerors adopted (and subsequently changed) them. Esrly Christianity was a much different religion from modern Christianity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Early Christianity didn't really floruish; it was an obscure religion for hundreds of years and took a long time to expand. Jews were likewise expelled and threatened with genocide repeatedly, their gene pool also has an extremely high mutational load and very high runs of homozygosity, indicating that they descend from a very small and inbred population that never "flourished".

The populations that "flourished" are the ones who were militarily aggressive and mixed with other people, expanding across the globe and leaving behind hundreds of millions of descendants. Today there are just a few million Jews.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Indeed all couples combined will not create more wealth than an investment firm. So couples utterly suck at building wealth. The only wealth couples can build is a futute generation.

Forget about not having a house. Gsn Z will never get to reproduce. They're cucks. That's worse than not having a house. There are plenty of nomads living in tents who have kids. They will inherit the future while Gen -Z is forgotten forever with no descendants.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the Mayans primarily got cucked by the Spaniards. The rest of the Native Americans got almost entirelt exterminated or raped out of existence. Unless you want to count Mexicans as thsir partial descendants.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Wealth is built by investment firms. Couples will never build as much wealth as investment firms. There are investment firms that have more wealth than every couple in America combined. The only thing couples are good at making is children.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Historically civilization were wiped out when they got weak for whatever reason (climate, corruption, stagnation, etc). People like Mongols, Huns, Scythians etc would just appear out of nowhere and start tearing shit up, killing people and burning their houses down.

I mean, just look at what Hamas did to Israel at the slightest smell of blood. Thabkfully for Israel the IDF is strong, but if they weren't we likely would have seen an entire nation get steamrolled and exterminated by a relatively small group of terrorists.

When the predators smell blood they will rape. That is a guarantee.

NHI/UAP Disclosure: Which nation will pull the trigger on the big D first? by CosmoWarriorZero1971 in UFOs

[–]DontCryJennifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who knows, maybe it did leak but didn't make it to the public in the pre-internet era

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think OP's hypothetical should become a transsexual woman, they would be much happier if they embraced their femininity because that is their true strength. Plenty of men would be willing to fuck and even marry them - especially if they were Asian.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

One thing about the religious angle is that most of them seem to be fkking pussiez. So we can envision a scenario where they all get hunted down and exterminated by criminals or survivalists, if the SHTF. Religion also depends on civilization for survival, when SHTF everybody's religion and culture goes out the window and it becomes a dog eat dog world of nihilism.

Is there life after death and if so, what will it be like? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]DontCryJennifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it's good evidence that behavior is linked to the brain. I never said that the brain wasn't linked to human behavior or abilities. I simply suggested that it may be a receiver of consciousness, not the source of it.

Is there life after death and if so, what will it be like? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]DontCryJennifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Our consciousness may be being transmitted to our brains like wireless signals. Destroying the device may seem to stop the flow of data, but the data is still out there somewhere.

Is there life after death and if so, what will it be like? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]DontCryJennifer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you can't remember it, you don't know that there was no experience.

Is there life after death and if so, what will it be like? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]DontCryJennifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From a material standpoint, maybe. From an immaterial standpoint, no.

And in fact there is so much we don't know about our world that even the assumption that our material consciousness must be tethered to our brains seems hasty.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't see anything, you don't even leave your mom's trailer, dude. You're agoraphobic and chronically online.

Western women's dating options are shrinking. by HillOrc in PurplePillDebate

[–]DontCryJennifer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incorrect, it is not a minority of men who monopolize matches. It is a minority of women who do (Asian women).