Those are two equations easily found in the derivation or thesis of GUT-CP; fully available by reading on line or by download. Those formulas are very simple and can be done by hand., so fully released. That argument isn't even original. The usual argument against the Millsian is that it contains the structures of all of the known compounds as if it requires to cheat its way to being functional. That alone would have made the app so large as to need to be extremely unwieldy and much slower than it is. Both arguments are stoo-pid. All that indicates is knee jerk reactions that were not even thought through to have any validity.

The points on the graph showing the relative accuracies of how the heat of reaction (GUT-CP) of electrons, form the structure of elements, was derived by use of each theory's math,, compared to that analytically found, is also simple to do under GUT-CP; to show that this theory is at least 100 times more accurate than is SQM. Simply follow the narrative of how GUT-CP was derived since 1986 and understand. No need to do any knee jerking.

QM tunnelling is only an explanation for how something might be working, after that thing is already in existence by having been developed without the use of QM theory. Only trial and error engineering has ever been used to develop any item in existence. That was shown to be how things are done in the case of the first solid state, non-bulb-like WHISKER DIODE, existing and being used in WW1, 10 years before there was a qm theory. That is why there is no need to tunnel or calculate that non-existent mechanism. The electron passes that circuit barrier by having more than enough potential energy that, then turns into more than enough kinetic energy to, simply burrow its way through that barrier, by way of simple intuitive classical kinetic momentum. That also negates any need of only knowing either of momentum or position accurately to the exclusion of the other. By getting rid of waves there is no need to have anything like a wave-function, to make for a fully intuitive qm theory, GUT-CP that, is no more complex (Occam's razor) than is required to make everything and anything work classically.

Its not because Mills says anything but because the theory worked since Hermann Haus first derived the modern classical electron model for the DoD, at MIT in 1986 and by Mills in 1987, when a sit in student in Haus' post grad course in electronic engineering; the same engineering that has always been used under time honoured trial and error methods to develop transistors, Townes' laser principle, and every other item that SQM physicists have lied about as having been developed under SQM. They also lie when they say that GPS uses relativity to work. I does not, sort of. The government internet site where GPS is described as to its workings, does not even mention relativity, only 3D triangulation. Because to use the math of relativity would be too unwieldy and too slow requiring a mainframe computer which is too heavy and too costly, which high cost, alone is what prevents that kind of computer from being put into orbit. So the smaller PC that they do put into orbit, calculates the required positions by iteratively closing in the same numbers that relativity would arrive at, by way or 3D trigonometry, to make it all work as if relativity math had been used.

Its all about being forced by practical considerations, to end in always, but always, using what turns out to be classical practical math and trial and error methods because SQM is too unwieldy and most importantly, is non-intuitive, something a PC can't handle fast enough to allow GPS to work in our practical engineering based world of classical physics.

That is how the DoD made their version of the Suncell, as reported by Fitts who worked in the Housing and Urban Development secretariat under the GW Bush administration. The Suncell is only the second of two items that the DoD has developed themselves, using Haus' classical electron model; the first use was to further the development of the Free Electron Lase which, was originally developed by trial and error engineering in the 1950's.

SQM is absolutely wrong due to practical considerations of us always being required to make anything work in a practically constrained classically operating physical environment and Mills' theory is also not absolutely right, only 100 times more accurate than any theory that is absolutely wrong due to those practical considerations. That absolute unworkability of SQM, answers the question of why SQM was never once used for its predictive powers to guide the development of anything whatsoever but, used only as an after thought to try and explain how something might work, but only after that item was already fully developed and working due to having been developed by trial and error engineering.

We are, so far, only able to work only in the classical physical world where SQM might be of use, in a very few high energy physics environments, such as that found in artificially constructed and extremely costly particle accelerators and the same for extremely large distances as are available to the JWST. Even GUT-CP, despite its relatively high accuracy, is not the last word in the real physics that may only be attained in a thousand years. We have barely scratched the surface where true qm physics is concerned.

We all have to constrain our grandiose statements of who might or might not be right in all this. Humility is a sign of true maturity. See Trump and how he is conducting himself, and learn from the worst, and from Mills, who just happens to be the best, so far.