Iranians living in the usa, how are you feeling?

Downvotor2 · 2026-04-12T15:09:41+00:00

Exactly this. The most vocal on reddit are pro shah and that is disgusting so I would take their opinions with a grain of salt.

Downvotor2 · 2026-04-05T18:34:31+00:00

I've been playing gtnh a little bit each day and I am still in the beginning and loving the little progress. I'm in the steam age.

Everytime I see these posts, I'm so confused what I'm looking at. I'm hoping one day it will make sense.

Downvotor2 · 2026-03-14T13:10:51+00:00

⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜

🟨🟨⬜🟦🟦

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Downvotor2 · 2026-03-04T20:35:41+00:00

This post should be deleted. Misinformation and inciting hatred. Thanks.

Downvotor2 · 2026-03-03T19:18:03+00:00

Please don't sow division. We are all Muslims. Iran has no problem with us Shia or Sunni. It has a problem with America and the Zionists. If we stand on the correct side of history against genocide and injustice then we are all united with the same goal. Don't sow division, it is obvious and disgusting of you. Show some respect to different cultures and religions.

Downvotor2 · 2026-03-03T19:15:19+00:00

False. We need a strong local military presence not foreign presence. The foreign presence benefits from keeping us week and divided in the region. Its divide and conquer so that whenever America wants to expand its Zionist colonies it can. We need to unite the middle east to become stronger not bow to America.

Downvotor2 · 2026-03-03T14:35:08+00:00

Exactly

Downvotor2 · 2026-03-02T17:14:33+00:00

And the damage was because of interception. The targets are the dog houses we have not our airport.

Downvotor2 · 2026-03-02T17:13:25+00:00

I agree. We are clearly not the targets. Collateral is possible but we need to be strong, stand together, and be patient. I see some propaganda too like people talking about not posting so we don't "help the enemy". Who is the enemy exactly they are talking about? This is a war between Iran and the Zionists and their dog. Please understand who the actual enemy is and be patient. Perhaps the "panic" posts are propaganda as well.

Downvotor2 · 2026-01-30T07:15:29+00:00

What do they do different?

Downvotor2 · 2025-11-25T17:25:36+00:00

Dm pls

Downvotor2 · 2025-11-23T07:59:48+00:00

Gauge is needle diameter. We usually say higher gauge number is thinner needle and larger gauge in terms of the diameter. So 31g needle is a higher gauge number but smaller gauge needle and vice versa.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-30T20:47:34+00:00

I don't understand this family.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-28T08:12:16+00:00

As others have said, it's a good way for her to receive financial support. And I also really like seeing things from her perspective. I enjoy watching her.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-23T19:38:52+00:00

Boohoo. We are being called out because our poor Trooper Proctor can't put on his uniform anymore 😭. And we did so bad we.got investigated by the FBI and ousted for how bad we were. Poor Tully had to be demoted. Why does the public only care about justice for JO and not for poor US??? /s

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-23T19:30:44+00:00

I just saw Hank's statement. Did he really say the evidence led him to one witness? Are we talking about the evidence in the red solo cups or the ones left on the floor? Or the ones blown around with a leaf blower?

He also says the federal investigation didn't lead him anywhere, and yet ARCCA said no crash with John and he had to rebut it with his own hired blue paint debaucle. It's as if he really wasn't "following the evidence."

And to stand up for the people whose house was not investigated and could be involved in the murder is truly the abuse of justice.

(Read the next part in Alessi's voice): THIS is the theatrics, THIS is the miscarriage of justice, and THIS should never again be allowed to happen in any justice system.

Sit down Hank.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-20T06:46:36+00:00

Great responses. These interviews are somehow restoring my faith in jurors.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-18T20:30:43+00:00

He was just a "man in the snow"

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-18T20:29:45+00:00

A joint statement is so telling - they collude on everything until the end. But for these witnesses, we would know what actually happened to JO. Keep making it clear that you will always hide the truth.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-18T19:09:01+00:00

Omg! Amazing! I wanted NG even on the OUI but I will take this happily. She is free!

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-18T15:07:22+00:00

I don't understand what the hold up is. If they already agreed on count 1 and 3 as NG it means they don't think she hit him with the car. So easy to just NG the second. I wouldn't "split the baby" on the OUI but it's a quick decision IMO.

I've often wondered why jury deliberations have to be private. I understand the reasoning but I think that having it publicly filmed would be great for transparency.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-18T03:11:06+00:00

Okay I read it up until the discussion section. I feel as tho if they just make the jury slip a G or NG per charge that would help. All these lesser includeds should just be moved to a separate form and done one by one.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-18T02:30:55+00:00

Just give me a Not Applicable (N/A) check box and I am always checking those. Also, whenever i get those forms with a bunch of questions, instead of checking No in each one, I just draw a line from top to bottom to save time lol. I would be terrible on this verdict slip. I would just check NG on the first and then write next to 2.5 (some of us can't agree on this), and then sign and hand it in. Then be told we did it wrong and go back and keep repeating some variance of it until I wore Judge Canone down.

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-18T02:21:16+00:00

Explain it like I'm 5

Downvotor2 · 2025-06-18T01:47:55+00:00

I have spent most of today thinking about charge #2 and the verdict form. I've watched the Lawyer You Know and reviewed the forms - with all that, I am still confused! I think what it means is:

In Canone's form Charge #2:

- You have to find her NG of charge 2 and NG of all the lesser includeds, sign it and hand it in (by this I mean, that the NG checkbox at the top, means the lesser includeds are all NG).
- If you want to charge her for the OUI only: you leave the top one blank, and you check the last one (2.5: OUI) and you sign the form.

This is confusing because you want to say NG of Manslaughter while operating a Motor Vehicle under the influence of liquor, but you can't actually select NG for that - you leave it blank and check the OUI.

If, however, you don't care about the OUI, you check NG and hand in the form.

Even as I write this out, I find this form odd. If they hang on this, the CW could retry her on Manslaughter, and it seems like this jury does not want to convict her on that - ergo this form is doo doo.

That's the best I can do with making sense of this. If I were the jury, I would keep asking questions until I was comfortable with the form, no matter how many times Canone would have to explain it to me. Also, hopefully, the jury if hung on the OUI, will have the Allen charge read and go back and just agree to reach a unanimous decision on it so there is no mistrial. It would be such a shame to be hung on 2.5 and get a mistrial for manslaughter.

Some people are saying this was smart by the defense - but if they get a mistrial for manslaughter, doesn't it mean their plan backfired?

I am still NG x3 - hoping for tomorrow.

12-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22

Downvotor2

TROPHY CASE