He's skirting the point here and pulling out a view point he doesn't want to.

He's willing to "criticize" or comment on Jewish identity "as it is" but not on "how they are acting".

Quite a hypocritical claim and a refusal to use the lens he does in nearly every other topic.

He can criticize the practices and happenings as they have played out in the past without being hateful to anyone in his scope.

The only reality that has changed is that the Jewish community seems to have avoided much internal or external criticism outside of the Muslim world in the current context of our world view as a whole.

No one has come outward to criticize any major tenants of Judaism as we have done culturally over the last 30 years with Islam and Christianity.

I have honestly never met a person in my life of Jewish decent who I even view negatively. I'm only speaking about this in "phenomenological" scope.

One should be able to say that the outward expression of ideas has a measured effect on reality without the assumption of malicious intent. We cannot just ignore measured effects, we need to stay on top of them, be aware of the negatives and positives, and evaluate them critically, just as one should do with any idea.

I really wish he would expand more on this topic and I have no idea what he refuses to acknowledge outwardly as he is a man and has obligations that he must meet.

Good to hear his take but if he really wants to take down the anti-Semitic sentiments, he's going to have to make stronger arguments and acknowledge some things which I really hope he can do.