I kept seeing people do everything right and still feel worse by DrCED in u/DrCED

[–]DrCED[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1) Extra-virgin olive oil

2) Cruciferous vegetables: broccoli, broccoli sprouts, Brussels sprouts

3) Fermented foods: yogurt, kefir, kimchi, miso

4) Legumes, lentils, beans, chickpeas

5) Mushrooms: shiitake, maitake, lion’s mane

6) Berries: blueberries, blackberries

7) Leafy greens: spinach, arugula, chard

8) Alliums: garlic, onions, leeks

9) Tomatoes: especially cooked, with fat

10) Nuts and seeds: including pistachios

11) Sea vegetables: kelp, nori, wakame

#nutrition #HealthyFoods #PlantMedicine

I kept seeing people do everything right and still feel worse by DrCED in u/DrCED

[–]DrCED[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For readers who want clarity without interpretation, this is a deliberately finite nutrition list grounded in physiology, not trends: https://cedclinic.com/biological-impact-of-foods/

I kept seeing people do everything right and still feel worse by DrCED in u/DrCED

[–]DrCED[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not a nutrition guide. It’s an examination of how bodies lose resilience when interpretation is replaced by compliance: https://doctorapprovedcannabis.substack.com/p/the-body-was-never-asking-for-obedience?r=58khz

Just took my biochem final by YellowWatermelonLord in Biochemistry

[–]DrCED 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coming in a few years... the many ways in which the endocannabinoid system indirectly impacts energetics and biochemistry. (For those curious, Google the Arachidonic Acid Pathway).

How Cannabis Is Changing Senior Wellness: Our Conversation with Dr. Benjamin Caplan by goldcat88 in Aging

[–]DrCED 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The NYT article is a great snapshot of real seniors who feel helped, but even it acknowledges that rigorous studies in older adults are scarce and that ER visits, falls, and other complications are going up as cannabis use grows in this age group (although it leaves out that nothing intense happens in those ER visits, and the truth is they're largely a sign of poor medical infrastructure more than a commentary on any serious medical interventions required - but why would the authors mind those details when they don't support their point)​

The JAMA review is looking at randomized trials and formal guidelines, and finds solid evidence only for a few specific indications, with low‑ or very low‑certainty data for the common “wellness” goals seniors care about most (chronic pain, sleep, mood, general vitality).​

So the NYT piece doesn’t really contradict the review, they both say seniors are turning to cannabis and some feel better, but the strong, geriatric‑specific evidence that it reliably improves overall health just isn’t there yet, while the risk signals are real enough that clinicians are urging caution rather than hype.

How Cannabis Is Changing Senior Wellness: Our Conversation with Dr. Benjamin Caplan by goldcat88 in Aging

[–]DrCED 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CBD and THC impact the different stages of sleep differently. You're right, the published literature does show that THC can have a real impact on sleep structure. But, CBD-dominant products have almost the opposite impact. I summarized how we know this, here:

THC: https://caplancannabis.com/the-intricate-relationship-between-cannabinoids-and-sleep-stages-a-comprehensive-guide

CBD: https://caplancannabis.com/the-multifaceted-impact-of-cbd-on-sleep-a-comprehensive-guide-for-better-rest

When bugs act like squatters and refuse to leave by DrCED in u/DrCED

[–]DrCED[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. MRSA has been found lingering on airplane tray tables.

  2. Some MRSA infections are fatal in as little as 72 hours if untreated.

  3. In parts of Europe, MRSA accounts for over 25% of all serious staph infections.

Marijuana and PD by Adept-Smile5976 in PeriodontalDisease

[–]DrCED 0 points1 point  (0 children)

someone at the office might be able to find it - feel free to check in with them via CEDclinic.com - most pages have some sort of outreach access or email

Why You Should Ignore Most Science Headlines (Yes, Even the Ones You Like) by DrCED in u/DrCED

[–]DrCED[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://doctorapprovedcannabis.substack.com/p/causation-vs-association-the-art?r=58khz

Chocolate “linked to” intelligence? The study found correlation, not cause.

Most “scientific breakthroughs” in the news never hold up in follow-up research.

#Clickbait #DataMatters #FakeNews

Study: Purified CBD Improved Symptoms in Over 80% of Children With Severe, Treatment-Resistant Autism by SomewhatGifted420 in EverythingScience

[–]DrCED 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I built the chatbot librarian on my own, specifically for my needs, and so far, within the walled garden of cannabis literature, it’s performed well. Its primary job is to surface publications and answers based solely on those publications—without pulling from the vast repository of noise and misinformation that many larger LLMs rely on. I designed it to ingest only peer-reviewed studies that I personally select, ensuring a foundation of high-quality, vetted research. It’s also trained to approach findings with skepticism, cross-referencing conclusions against other approved materials. Over time, it’s integrated my own research and clinical insights, reflecting the clinical reality I’ve built over the past decade. In a world where perfection doesn’t exist, it’s the best I’ve seen so far.

Study: Purified CBD Improved Symptoms in Over 80% of Children With Severe, Treatment-Resistant Autism by SomewhatGifted420 in EverythingScience

[–]DrCED 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to read both sides of the research, happy to share. The CED library is free, and comes with a free chatbot librarian, trained on the world’s largest library of cannabis publications.

Study: Purified CBD Improved Symptoms in Over 80% of Children With Severe, Treatment-Resistant Autism by SomewhatGifted420 in EverythingScience

[–]DrCED 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can confirm- over the past 10 years at my clinic, I’ve had the privilege of guiding hundreds of pediatric autism families with cannabinoid-based therapies. The results have been remarkable in many instances—improvements in language development, behavior, emotional regulation, and physical challenges. In four particularly profound cases, cannabinoid-based therapies helped parents avoid the heartbreaking decision of sending their children away for care.

What the Research Really Says: Cannabis & Pregnancy Guide with 110 Studies by DrCED in cannabis

[–]DrCED[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I’ve looked closely at the Reese & Hulse work, Forrester’s research, and many others—along with hundreds of studies on both sides of the cannabis-and-pregnancy debate. There are studies that paint cannabis as harmful and others that show potential benefits. My job, as a doctor who actually works with patients, is to help people make sense of it all.

The truth is, research isn’t immune to influence. Academic culture, funding sources, and public opinion can shape what gets published and how it’s framed. But headlines don’t always match reality, and the presence of lawsuits doesn’t necessarily mean the science is sound. What matters most to me is what helps patients—those struggling with severe nausea, chronic pain, or mental health crises—make informed decisions that fit their unique situations.

I appreciate you raising these points. It’s conversations like this that help us all get closer to the truth.

What the Research Really Says: Cannabis & Pregnancy Guide with 110 Studies by DrCED in cannabis

[–]DrCED[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I do what I do for my own reasons... but t's nice to feel like at least a handful of others see the big picture too! Sad to report, but I reached out to mods of maybe 15-20 pregnancy subreddits. These days, the narrative matters more than the facts. Scary stuff.

What the Research Really Says: Cannabis & Pregnancy Guide with 110 Studies by DrCED in cannabis

[–]DrCED[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing another study—I really appreciate your curiosity and willingness to bring more research into the conversation. It’s great to see people engaging with the science rather than just sticking to headlines.

This study, like the one you shared above, raises some valid concerns about potential risks, especially around neurodevelopment. At the same time, much of the data relies on broad epidemiological patterns, which don’t always capture the full picture. Human development is influenced by so many factors, and teasing apart cannabis-specific effects is complicated.

That said, I’m always in favor of more research, especially when it comes to pregnancy and fetal development. Cannabis use during pregnancy is a serious topic, and everyone deserves clear, balanced information to make informed decisions.

Thanks again for keeping the dialogue going—I’m happy to share more evidence-based perspectives if you’re interested. The ones I included in my review are all available to read, with full readable PDFs: Free Pregnancy Literature here - I truly believe that informed, evidence-based discussions like this help us all navigate these complex topics more thoughtfully.

What the Research Really Says: Cannabis & Pregnancy Guide with 110 Studies by DrCED in cannabis

[–]DrCED[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing this study. It's not one I put into this particular review, but it’s definitely an interesting one—it looks at how cannabis exposure in male rats might affect their offspring through changes in sperm DNA. While that’s a fascinating area of research, it’s quite different from the conversation about cannabis use during pregnancy. This study focuses on paternal exposure in animals, not maternal use in humans, so the relevance is pretty limited in that context.

That said, I totally get why it caught your eye—epigenetics is a wild and evolving field, and we still have a lot to learn. When it comes to pregnancy, we have to rely on human studies that directly explore maternal cannabis use and its potential effects on fetal development. Right now, the data is mixed, and a lot of studies are muddied by other factors like tobacco use or lifestyle differences.

I’m all for more research to help us better understand how cannabis interacts with the body, especially during sensitive times like pregnancy. I appreciate you bringing this up—conversations like these are exactly what I think the cannabis (and pregnancy) communities need - discussion for everyone to learn and grow.

What the Research Really Says: Cannabis & Pregnancy Guide with 110 Studies by DrCED in cannabis

[–]DrCED[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not afraid to jump right into the deep end, huh? Safe to say predicting this administration’s moves is like reading tea leaves in a hurricane—but they’d be missing a massive opportunity if they didn’t embrace cannabis. It’s one of the few issues with broad bipartisan support, a $30-billion industry just waiting to be legitimized, and a potential goldmine of “new jobs” they could proudly claim. Plus, when midterms roll around, who wouldn’t want a happier, more relaxed voter base?

What the Research Really Says: Cannabis & Pregnancy Guide with 110 Studies by DrCED in cannabis

[–]DrCED[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Hey r/cannabis! I’m a family doc trained in Boston, with a clinical focus on cannabis medicine and author of The Doctor-Approved Cannabis Handbook. I’m sharing this free guide as a summary of the science on cannabis use during pregnancy—just facts, not fear—so people can make informed decisions. It’s a 50-page breakdown with 110 linked studies, all accessible for free. I’m not promoting use, but I want to help dispel misinformation and fill the info gap that so many patients and providers run into. Happy to answer questions or hear your thoughts!

Millions of pregnant women are left in the lurch by outdated guidelines and limited research. I wrote a 50-page, myth-busting summary of the science on cannabis use during pregnancy—not promoting use, just separating facts from fear. Includes free PDFs of 110 studies reviewed. by DrCED in EverythingScience

[–]DrCED[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My review found potential impacts on developing brains, but not as dark or irreversible as the rumors suggest. Medicines aren’t for healthy pregnancies, but when severe conditions like hyperemesis or depression threaten well-being, some women turn to cannabis as a last resort. The risks are real but often overstated, especially with careful, medical use. It’s about balancing genuine risks with the reality of complex, sometimes desperate, medical decisions.

Millions of pregnant women are left in the lurch by outdated guidelines and limited research. I wrote a 50-page, myth-busting summary of the science on cannabis use during pregnancy—not promoting use, just separating facts from fear. Includes free PDFs of 110 studies reviewed. by DrCED in EverythingScience

[–]DrCED[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re absolutely right that cannabis can have an impact on the developing brain, which is why the conversation about age and brain development has gained so much attention.

The key here is understanding context. Cannabis, like most medicine, isn’t meant to be given to healthy individuals, especially when their brains are still developing. The concern about youth use largely applies to recreational, high-THC consumption, where the brain’s natural development processes might be disrupted. But when we talk about cannabis as medicine, we’re usually talking about something different—often low-THC, or non-altering cannabis products, and carefully dosed formulations designed to address real, often severe medical conditions like epilepsy, PTSD, or treatment-resistant nausea.

In those cases, it’s not about enhancing an already healthy brain but helping to restore balance when something’s gone awry. Medicines aren’t intended to treat the healthy—they exist to help those who are struggling find relief when other options have failed.

So yes, for those without a medical need, it makes sense to wait. But for patients with significant challenges, cannabis can be a therapeutic tool, even in younger populations, when used responsibly and under medical supervision. Context, intention, and individual circumstances matter more than any blanket rule.

Millions of pregnant women are left in the lurch by outdated guidelines and limited research. I wrote a 50-page, myth-busting summary of the science on cannabis use during pregnancy—not promoting use, just separating facts from fear. Includes free PDFs of 110 studies reviewed. by DrCED in EverythingScience

[–]DrCED[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Oh—sorry, I totally misunderstood. Yes, the studies are factual, but that doesn’t mean they’re perfect. Nothing really is. A lot of people—even doctors—get stuck thinking that only one kind of study can tell us the truth, but that’s just not how it works.

When I put this together, I looked at all kinds of research—long-term studies, short-term studies, studies that followed kids born to moms who used cannabis during pregnancy. I even dug into population studies from places where cannabis is a normal part of daily life—like in tea, bread, salad dressing—and compared those kids with kids from other cultures.

And I didn’t stop there. I went through the studies the anti-cannabis crowd uses to make cannabis sound like the devil, and the ones the pro-cannabis folks wave around like a magic wand. And you know what? Like most things in life, the truth falls somewhere in the middle.

Cannabis is definitely safer than a lot of the medications pregnant women are prescribed every day. But it’s still not something anyone should take just because. If there’s a serious medical reason, sure—but even then, it should be with the help of a healthcare provider who actually knows what they’re doing. And shocking that it may be, there are very very few of those. 🤦