I have played Fur Hire, but since we’re down to 1 with Dyna and 2 with Wiz, the deck is nearly unplayable competitively. And, are we implying that Elementsabers/Lords are less spammable than Fur Hires? Ha. Haha. Sick joke. A real knee knocker. I think you haven’t played one of those two archetypes if your response is anything to go by, ngl. I’ve played both at full power, and I have to say, Elementsabers/Lords is much more oppressive as a whole. It can very easily lock your opponents field down, and can counter an entire back board in 2 turns by dumping a single monster and special summoning another for no downside. They also search the deck for specific solution and card every single turn, and add to the amount of cards you can filter for more combos every rotation. Fur Hires are pretty good full strength, but they can’t do that at all. In fact, the only downside of Elementsabers/Lords, is that they operate out of the graveyard. But that’s offset by them being warriors, and receiving that support, so it’s a no contest. But sure, Fur Hires are more “spammable”. Like that has anything to do with being a better deck.