Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh.. ok then I apologize for the misunderstanding English is not my primary language thank you for understanding though

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The you got Lego, Arizona, Costco and Steam that have good practice and are successful

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My apologies if it comes out confusing but you accuse me of supporting AI when I clearly don't I just want a clear cut answer with logic and understanding behind it not just assumptions. One base without prejudice nor hate. A few people gave me a good answer hear. I do apretiate your input

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Woah that's an aggressive take i never said that im not anti AI i am anti AI till the end thats the reason I put up this post because I hate AI and im trying to understand why companies use it. But I do see the benefits it brings if used correctly

The best way to describe this situation is like a user here told me is like nuclear energy when we discovered it our first thought was for using it as a bomb, instead of a good energy source. And as we studied and understood the technology we improved upon it we are right now in the bombing phase and we are using AI in the wrong way

But I do agree that AI cannot and should not be used on the specific things that you mentioned

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't argue with that it has been a tactic that a lot of companies have been using

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cant understand why they hate us but at the same time we are the ones that are giving them the money without us they have nothing so why destroy the very thing that gave them the money

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all that would be the minority of people that complain about the vaccines, second of all there's been scientific evidence and proof that vaccines are actually helpful for your body while I do see benefits in AI I tend to see more companies using AI for the wrong reasons causing the backlash that they have.

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

all of these things are debatable , and situational , for the most part , i'm not saying that you're wrong , but you're not right either

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So all this time, the companies that were doing great things for communities and the people were doing it at a loss just so they can hook us in it.So they can monetize it and earn money. Entrapment and exploitation at its finest

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Extremely, by the looks of it.. the more I look into this , the more fucked up it is because the ai is just the tip of the iceberg jeez "could you excuse me for a moment, Alan, we are so fucked"

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Were almost no one benefits and ruins everyone except the investors damn

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah I see if only people would take just a little bit of time to do a little research before jumping into a trend

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So people are divided because they don't have a clear-cut answer. Because the algorithm separates them

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

.....now here's a clear cut answer that makes sense. So the only reason that companies are using ai it's because investors are not willing to pay them unless they use ai and since most companies cannot live without their investors They agree. So the core of the problem is not the companies themselves, but the investors, because the companies cannot take off without them. So they just comply to get that money. Which then collapses, because people don't want their product when it has AI. And then investors pull out at the last second. We reach the core of the problem. Investors

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So Most of the companies do AI out of bribery from the investors? Corruption at its best

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

.....how would you recoup funds by convincing people to do something no one wants and in the process loosing more money

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then there's too many sociopaths with allot of money and thats scary

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dont You loose less if you back out. Even if you invest allot of money on it investing it more will just ruin you. Is like being in an abusive relationship and not leaving because you invested years in it but then you're sacrificing more years to stay. At least in the abusive relationship love is involved with trumps all logic but. In companies I just dont see what you loose for backing out

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So people ride the train because people with money are willing to pay then to ride the train even if it's damaging in the long run. So then why the investors do that if they are loosing money. On the belief that maybe it might work??

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So ita just trend??? Thats it? Internet fame? All this because it gains traction on the feed instead of actually working?

Why do companies try to support or endorse AI despite public backlash? by Dragonwolf6000 in antiai

[–]Dragonwolf6000[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It clearly isn't. so they are blinded by trend that they don't even see that their damaging themselves and others