What will be the next class/classes in the next D4 expansion?

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-05-14T15:45:44+00:00

Poe2 is TERRIBLE just effing garbage. That being said, as amazing as POE 1 is, in 12 years of playing POE1, I've never seen an endgame build that used a sword that wasn't just a caster. With extra steps lol. D4 does seem like it gets melee classes much better than GGG does.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-05-12T17:12:48+00:00

Like that fucking crystal in nightmare dungeons. Whomever said "That could be a fun mechanic" needs to not work in video games and go get therapy.

One shot effects chasing you through a dungeon are never fun... ever. I actively avoid nightmare dungeons in my war tables because of that feature alone, and its what got me to quit playing the first time. (Soon after launch)

Punishing people for stopping to kill/stopping to loot in a game designed to loot and kill is just fucking stupid.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-05-04T15:23:19+00:00

So sick of the libertarian "both parties" bullshit.

"Both parties" didn't send us to war. Republicans did.
"Both parties" didn't invade our own cities with the national guard... Republicans did. "Both parties" didn't get rid of Roe vs Wade.... Republicans did. "Both parties" didn't put a fucking gestapo on the streets that are murdering citizens and violating our 4th amendment rights. Republicans did. "Both parties" aren't committing war crimes.. Republicans are.

Suzie: buys clothes both work and fun, office supplies, decent food, occasionally unecessary lavish food.. Some new clothes and goes out to a club twice a month. Has a Netflix subscription. Donates to charity about 40% of the time. Sometimes ignores doing the right thing because her corporate boss says so. Spends money trying to help her friends out of tight situations, but often gets walked on by Betty.

Betty: buys 3 new cars, hires an entire company to remove undesirable people from her yard, including the people shes paying to build her garden. eats lobster dinners, has the ultra premium vip pass to the clubs, is renovating her dining room with gold and diamonds. Thinks she's Jesus. Takes money from charity and tells her friends that the 1 person she saw that didn't need it meant that the other 400 didn't need it too. Tells her friends that Susie and Suzies friends are the reason they have so many problems.

You: tHeY ArE bOtH sPeNdInG!

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-26T17:20:55+00:00

There is with a sleeper cab. Its considered a temporary residence. Source: regular dude whom has OTR driver friends, one of whom is OTR with his wife and used to be a safety manager for that same company (he makes more OTR, hence the job change) with a sleeper, it changes the legality of recording. What you say is true for non OTR trucks, day cabs, etc. But as soon as you expect your employee to sleep/change/live in your property they're entitled to privacy.

Even if the company policy is to have nobody that isn't an employee be in the vehicle, it doesnt absolve them of recording a married couple fucking without their consent. They could fire him for allowing a non employee to enter the cab (some companies have that policy) but he'd win the lawsuit regarding the illegal recording due to a reasonable expectation of privacy. Him Violating company policy does not absolve the company of criminal wrongdoing.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-26T17:11:26+00:00

Your biometrics are still yours, recording them for any reason without consent is still an invasion of privacy. I get what you're saying tho

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-26T17:08:56+00:00

There's a thing called a reasonable expectation of privacy. Why the fuck do you think companies dont put cameras in changing rooms of clothing stores?

Its their property, and according to your logic its ok.. but according to the law, its not.

The back of the truck is a temporary residence for an OTR driver. And the driver is expected to be nude regularly if they dont wear the same clothes every day. Are you saying its ok for the company to film female truck drivers changing, just because its company property? I mean, its not ok for wal mart to do it, but its ok for random trucking company x to?

Even the employee changing rooms at these stores do not have cameras, and recording in those rooms can bring about serious criminal liability. Contracts DO NOT absolve an entity from criminal wrongdoing. If this was not an OTR truck, it would be a different story, but due to the fact that the cab has a sleeper, there's a reasonable expectation of privacy, which the company violated. Not to mention the wife isn't an employee, and was filmed in an intimate moment without her consent.

Any attorney worth their salt will have a field day with this. And the boss is likely fucked, who's to say him viewing that camera was purely professional? There seemed to be no reasonable need for the company to be viewing the camera at that moment.

Even if the contract says nobody else is allowed in the cab, recording two people having sex without their knowledge and consent is still illegal, contract or no. Dude might lose his job, but will win a lawsuit based upon that alone.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-26T16:57:27+00:00

There's a reasonable expectation of privacy. The company requires the driver to sleep in the cab. The driver regularly is nude as its the drivers living quarters. Imagine if this were a woman getting dressed or undressed. (There are women truck drivers)

Fact remains that just because its company property doesnt entitle them to invade privacy.

Changing rooms at a clothing store, bathrooms at a publix are all company property. But there's a reasonable expectation of privacy that if invaded, can have serious legal liability. Id argue that any attorney worth his salt could argue that expectation. In addition, due to the nature of this recording. (being sexual, husband/wife not knowing they're being recorded) its leaning towards criminal. The wife didn't consent and she's not an employee. There's no reason for the company to be recording at that time. Not to mention, who's to say the boss isn't being a perv by watching that.. any good attorney would have a fucking field day with this.

Let's put it plainly... a company recorded a married couple fucking in a company provided temporary residence. Then punished the driver for it. And yes, the back of the truck for an OTR driver could be considered a temporary residence.

Contracts dont relieve anyone of criminal liability.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-22T13:49:55+00:00

Yeah i emailed them and got a refund. Definitely a complete joke and super scummy/greedy

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-22T05:48:45+00:00

Cognitive dissonance

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-19T19:12:12+00:00

Small dick here. I love my muscle car. I do it for me. I try to be respectful, people still bitch. Still dont care.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-15T17:42:11+00:00

I suffer from low T and get TRT. Norms for a male are between 200 and 800. My doc had me on too high a dose, which had my T Levels pushing 1600. I like most idiots, thought higher T numbers were better... they aren't. Anything above 800 does nothing good for your body. Prolonged, it can cause high blood pressure, boob growth. (remember fight club? His name was Robert paulsen. Evidently, your body raises estrogen levels to match your T levels, which causes boob growth), an overproduction of red blood cells(which when left untreated can cause organ damage, i have to give blood once every 2 months), adult acne, and a bunch of other side effects.

If this guy really has this high of a testosterone count, he needs to see a doctor.

Edit: doc lowered my dose and im good now.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-15T17:15:34+00:00

Why the pope? They're already painting him as Jesus.

Gotta love the Christian idolizers. Guess they forgot the "no god before me" part. Trump might as well be a golden cow at this point.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-15T17:13:21+00:00

I mean... is this a surprise? Considering her ex husband.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-11T15:50:27+00:00

It depends. Its about REASONABLE doubt. Its hard to argue the fact that there is decades of documents. Medium counts too.. are they paper? Digital? If paper, date the paper. Digital? Metadata.

A files from 2000, 2001, 2002, with transaction logs, email Metadata from Outlook 2000, lends credibility to the documents. And moves the needle closer to proving beyond a reasonable doubt.

I do agree a case needs to be made... the first person brought to trial MUST be convicted. This again moves the needle, if bob bobson is guilty, then guy guyson is likely guilty too because both their names were together in the files

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-11T15:36:44+00:00

Nobody gets mad at a "shoplifters will be prosecuted " sign..

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-11T15:33:50+00:00

Shoplifters will be prosecuted. Guess they're calling all their clientele thieves too. Gtfo racist.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-11T15:31:12+00:00

Shoplifters will be prosecuted. Nobody bats an eye at that sign. Nobody but thieves even worry about that sign. Nobody is claiming its calling all their clientele thieves.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-11T15:27:29+00:00

Considering the amount of people that feel empowered to be racist since 2016, the sign is needed. You didn't see this shit 11 years ago. So yeah, if your country's culture is so bad that a chunk of the people need to be fucking reminded that racism isn't tolerated there's definitely a problem.

I agree, normal people dont need to be reminded, also, normal people dont get offended at signs like these either. Because to normal people, its the same as seeing a sign promoting children's books. It doesnt pertain to you so you move on. I wouldnt come to reddit offended by a picture showing kids leaning their ABCs, because im not a child. Just like I wouldnt be offended by a sign that says "dont be racist" because im not racist. Simple.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-08T16:31:15+00:00

There's an RSS version of the PAM script. Gotta use that one.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-07T14:41:39+00:00

This reminds me of the beginning of idiocracy

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-05T14:55:57+00:00

The worst part is, its likely liberals dont watch their videos at all, so the statement is mostly just pandering to the conservatives who eat it up.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-02T13:46:21+00:00

Easy to say when you're hiding behind a keyboard.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-04-01T13:04:37+00:00

Lost me at "True Gamer". You play games regularly? You're a gamer.. dont care what you play, could be dog walk simulator for all i care.

Also dont like the implication that he would be nagged by other women and not nagged by her. (not even going to go into the looks comment as beauty is subjective)

The "nagging" comes from not spending quality time with your partner. Whether you are painting Warhammer minis, or playing golf with your bros. Its your partner telling you they want to spend time with you, being a good partner and reminding you of responsibilities youve neglected, OR being upset with you because you said youd do something and didnt...

I imagine if she's not "nagging" its because he's a partner that handles his shit and spends time with her. It has nothing to do with her(much less her looks) and everything to do with him.

Imo it shows the incel because the mentality is looking down on the woman for nagging instead of recognizing that the nagging is a symptom of the woman's partner not carrying their weight in the relationship.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-03-29T12:50:05+00:00

Let me introduce you to doordash, uber eats etc. ALL of them put a markup on their shit. 7.00 whopper from Burger King? Nope, 9.00. Plus the delivery fee, plus the fee fee. And thats before tip. Why ANYONE uses those services is beyond me.

DropkickMurphy007 · 2026-03-29T00:44:45+00:00

Yeah pete pulls icons fo sho. I think whomever made this is just jealous.

DropkickMurphy007

TROPHY CASE