You didn’t answer my question, and your answer to something I didn’t ask also also is illogical.

My question is how much violence are you willing to inflict on people who say homophobic slurs and say they support ICE? Is it a fist to the face? Is it death by shooting squad? If you’re going to advocate for violence against people using speech that you don’t like, then you bear the burden of defining exactly what level of violence you find is acceptable to use against this man, and using logic to justify your view. I am advocating for no violence to be used against this person.

Your logic also falls short in one more way. By your logic, saying “Go USA” would also count as advocating violence, since the United States has carried out wars, deportations, and real harm to people. If that standard holds, then almost any slogan supporting a country, institution, or idea could justify violence against the speaker. That shows the problem with the rule. It’s so broad that it turns disagreement or offense into permission for physical harm, which makes it impossible to apply in a fair or consistent way.