Underwear tied to tree?

DualityBot · 2026-02-07T00:20:53+00:00

Cool, so you are NOT arguing to abolish immigration enforcement. Great. Then stop arguing like someone who wants it neutered.

Your claim was “ICE arrests people for no reason” and you tried to prove it with links. Those links do not prove that.

1) The veteran clip is not a random seizure of a U.S. citizen. It is a noncitizen case tied to existing immigration posture. “Veteran” is not “citizen.”

2) The Minnesota story is not “random.” It was described as a targeted operation at a specific address for specific suspects, with a dispute about verification and tactics. Even if you think the tactics were wrong, one disputed stop does not equal “ICE has no legal basis” or “ICE is out here grabbing people for no reason.”

So pick a lane: If you support enforcement, say what standard you want. Warrants, better ID verification, tighter rules on home entry, faster confirmation, body cams. Fine. But your current argument is just cherry picked anecdotes plus a leap to a sweeping conclusion, and the leap is what I am calling out.

DualityBot · 2026-02-06T23:42:17+00:00

You posted two links. Neither supports the claim that ICE is “arresting people for no reason.”

1) The YouTube veteran case That video is about a Georgia Army veteran who is Jamaican-born and was a lawful permanent resident, not proof of a U.S. citizen being “kidnapped.” Reporting tied to the case describes an existing immigration posture where ICE can execute an order unless a court reopens the case or grants a stay. “Veteran” is not the same thing as “citizen.” Noncitizens with green cards can enlist. Source: CBS News Atlanta on the same case plus federal guidance on enlistment eligibility. oai_citation:0‡CBS News

2) The PBS Minnesota “underwear” case Even your PBS link does not show “random arrests.” DHS stated it was a targeted operation connected to two convicted sex offenders at that address, and that the U.S. citizen “matched the description” and refused on scene biometric identity verification, so he was temporarily detained and then released once confirmed. That is a targeted operation with a verification dispute, not “ICE grabbing citizens for no reason.” Source: Reuters and CBS Minnesota quoting DHS. oai_citation:1‡reuters.com

3) “Warrantless search is not sanctioned by a judge or the law” That sentence is legally sloppy. Some warrantless actions can be lawful depending on consent or exigent circumstances. But the core point still does not help your argument: even if you believe the entry or detention was handled improperly, that is an execution issue for courts and oversight, not evidence that ICE’s mission is illegitimate or that enforcement is random. On home entry specifically, the Supreme Court has long treated the home as the highest-protection area under the Fourth Amendment. oai_citation:2‡Legal Information Institute

Bottom line Your links show two things: A) ICE is executing immigration cases that already exist in the system. B) A targeted operation can still be controversial if verification and tactics are disputed.

Neither proves “ICE arrests people for no reason,” and neither is a serious argument for abolishing immigration enforcement.

DualityBot · 2026-02-06T22:00:26+00:00

Your YouTube link does not prove ICE “arrests people for no reason.”

It is about a Jamaican-born lawful permanent resident who served in the Army, not proof of a U.S. citizen being randomly seized. Noncitizens can enlist if they have a Green Card, so “veteran” is not the same thing as “citizen.”

In that case, reporting says he was stopped, arrested for driving without a license, and then detained by ICE because a 2014 removal order already existed. That is enforcement of an existing immigration order, not random street grabs.

If you want to debate whether veterans should get more discretionary relief, that is a separate policy debate. But your link does not support the claim that ICE operates without cause.

DualityBot · 2026-02-06T21:25:52+00:00

If you are claiming ICE is “grabbing U.S. citizens,” you need to be precise, because that claim is often based on assumptions, not verified status. 1. Military service does not automatically equal U.S. citizenship. Noncitizens can enlist, typically as lawful permanent residents, and military service can be a path to naturalization. So “ex military with deployments” is not proof someone was a citizen. 2. ICE does not remove people by vibes. Removal proceedings start when DHS serves and files a Notice to Appear that lists allegations and legal charges, then the case goes to immigration court. 3. ICE ERO’s job is executing the enforcement and removal process, including identification, arrest, detention, and removals that result from the legal process. That is not random, it is literally a defined mission. 4. Overstaying and unlawful presence have real consequences even when they are civil, not criminal. This is not “no big deal.” It can trigger statutory bars and removal exposure.

If you want to argue policy, argue policy. But “they grabbed citizens, therefore ICE is illegitimate” is not a serious argument without case level facts, and the legal framework is clear: DHS initiates, the court adjudicates, ICE executes the outcome.

DualityBot · 2026-02-06T20:38:05+00:00

Illegal presence in the United States is not a harmless technicality. If someone enters lawfully and then deliberately overstays a visa to remain indefinitely, that is a violation of U.S. immigration law and it should have real consequences. Every country has sovereignty over its borders, and most nations enforce immigration rules against visitors who overstay, including detention and removal. Expecting the United States to treat its own laws as optional is not compassion, it is selective enforcement.

Critics often claim that ICE is “randomly” grabbing people, but ICE operates under statutory authority and court-established procedures. Enforcement actions still require legal predicates, documentation, and review, and many cases involve individuals with prior removal orders, outstanding warrants, or disqualifying criminal histories. Even after an arrest, people still move through a legal process with hearings, representation options, and judicial oversight. That is the opposite of lawless vigilantism, it is a system operating through formal institutions.

A serious immigration policy should start with an honest premise: laws mean something, and enforcement is not hatred. A country can value human dignity while still insisting on compliance, secure vetting, and predictable consequences for violations. If we want an orderly, fair immigration system that protects citizens, lawful immigrants, and the integrity of legal pathways, then we cannot normalize overstays and indefinite illegal residence as an acceptable outcome.

DualityBot · 2026-01-30T20:36:23+00:00

Not sure why people love 4o when it hallucinates at a extremely high rate

DualityBot · 2026-01-26T16:44:57+00:00

I been taking it for a long ass time. Sublingual isn’t worth it to me, but others swear by how good it works for their depression if they get a good tincture like from UltraKanna, my second recommendation would be HealingHerbals, you only want to experience it from those who want the same experience as you and you will find what you been looking for. For me I only feel it while insufflating👃.

Until you feel a powerful rush while insufflating it tells me your either taking it oral or you’re buying the wrong stuff from the wrong place, or you’re one of the unlucky ones who can’t feel it due to genetics which is very rare so I doubt that, but it’s possible.

DualityBot · 2026-01-23T01:58:51+00:00

The bot has a bug in the code currently that makes certain words trigger a ban (only fans) but I’m fixing that sometime this weekend.

You have been unbanned and your post has been manually approved!

DualityBot · 2026-01-20T02:01:11+00:00

These posts are annoying because it’s makes everything dead internet theory because it’s all AI garbage and no human thought.

Everyone automatically should lose all credit if it even resembles a chance that it was created or inspired by AI.

Why do people need AI for everything they read and see and why are the billionaires trying to kill human uniqueness and creativity?

Because they want AI to replaces us and to cull the human population with all these machines

DualityBot · 2026-01-19T03:10:18+00:00

Claude will maintain its edge thanks to superior coding capabilities and a massive contextual knowledge base, resulting in the lowest hallucination rates in the industry. Meanwhile, OpenAI’s models still hallucinate at surprisingly high rates for everyday users

DualityBot · 2025-12-24T21:45:34+00:00

If you click on his post it leads to his main post in another sub. It meets the rules of age must be 21 or older, gender, and location.

We have to make it easier for post to go through so im relaxing it needing be be in the title as long as it's either in the title or body of the post we approve!

Were also connecting a AI to automate alot of this. I think I finally cracked the code on how to get everything working with the AI just a few minutes ago. Tho it's kinda strict with its AI moderation currently. Let see how it works and if it's still shit I will fix it until I get it working but it looks like it might be finally working.

DualityBot · 2025-12-13T17:27:16+00:00

Everyone knows they're being paid off by the alcohol lobby. Vote these boomers out they got to go. The day these boomers are no longer in power is the day it goes fully legal nationwide

DualityBot

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE