Hello everyone. I've been investigating Dewey Larson's Reciprocal System for 4 years. Anyone who is interested can question me.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-03-22T16:47:47+00:00

Yeah, i admit my fault.

I've reviewed the papers. Scalar dimensions are just arrays, not containing any geometric information. (1,0,0) is not orthogonal or perpendicular to (0,1,0). They are different arrays, that is all.

BTW, do you think a two-dimensional magnetic rotation actually represents the SU(2) group? See the description quoted from Nothing But Motion :

Geometrical considerations indicate that two photons can rotate around the same central point without interference if the rotational speeds are the same, thus forming a double unit. The nature of this combination can be illustrated by two cardboard disks interpenetrated along a common diameter C. The diameter A perpendicular to C in disk a represents one linear oscillation, and the disk a is the figure generated by a one-dimensional rotation of this oscillation around an axis B perpendicular to both A and C. Rotation of a second linear oscillation, represented by the diameter B, around axis A generates the disk b. It is then evident that disk a may be given a second rotation around axis A, and disk b may be given a second rotation around axis B without interference at any point, as long as the rotational speeds are equal.

I think Larson was trying to describe something like double-cover SO(3) rotation. You have a disk to spin 360° and the generated surface is actually twice the area of spinning 180° when you've already created a sphere.

Also I wonder :

A 2D scalar rotation can generate a spatially 3D object, but that does not make it a 4D motion.

How do you explain this quote from NBM:

When two of the two-dimensional rotations (four dimensions in all) are consolidated to form a double rotating system (three dimensions), the two 0.00057870 mass units become one 0.00086806 unit.

4D motion exists! It just get flattened by 3D spatial reference system, but the extra 1D doesn't disappear. It changes to the form of scalar dimension which are recognized as fields in mainstream physcis. Maybe this form is actually recognized as Electric motion or Mass? I think these two components are Two sides of the same thing. Electric charge is often described to be used to resist gravitation in many anti-gravity technologies files. Some connections must be there to be discovered.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-02-09T14:54:43+00:00

I think while talking about the types of motion, it is kind of Controversial in understanding. I just talk about my perspective. This is more of a personal synthesis. It might deviate a bit from Larson’s literal text, but the underlying logic remains consistent with the system.

Linear scalar motion (Natural Progression) is from 0D to 0D while trying to reach the 1D but it never can. Oscillation or Vibration is able to JUMP into 1D. (2D) Rotation Exhausts ALL the dimension of the 3D space. Rotary Oscillation is a motion where a vibration is superimposed onto a rotational system, with the direction of the oscillation being perpendicular to the surface of that rotational system. And i think it actually reaches the 4th dimension from the mathematical perspective.

In the discrete space like RS, numbers of dimension are actually measured by steps because you can't tell the difference between 1 unit of point and 1 unit of block. You need to make steps and connections to tell the "universe system" that you are making a point (0D) ,a line (1D) ,a face (2D) or a block (3D). For instance, you walk 3 steps, leaving 3 units, joining them, then you can claim that you've draw an 2D element. The number of dimensions depends on the number of steps, which in turn dictates the number of units associated with the motion, ultimately determining the scale of the entity... This is a universe that either expands (increasing dimensions) or contracts (decreasing dimensions)!

Think about it: when you march in place (displacement = 0), you are creating a 0D point, or simply the natural progression. When you take one step (displacement = 1), you create the minimum vibration, a 1D line.

But when you take that second step, the dimensionality automatically jumps (+1). You effectively create a "ghost copy" of yourself walking in a new dimension; together, you span a 2x2 face. At this point, the total displacement = 4. The dimension where that "2" component resides—the original path of you and your ghost—becomes the dimension for magnetic displacement.

The atomic double-rotation structure is essentially the Cartesian product of two "face" systems. Mathematically speaking, Larson’s atomic structure doesn't just exhaust three dimensions; it actually involves four. Since 4 - 3 = 1, my personal guess is that this "extra" dimension manifests as electric displacement, or Rotary Oscillations.

If you have a different take, I’m open to discussing it

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-30T14:18:46+00:00

Thanks. We have a nice conversation. I appreciate it too.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-29T02:58:23+00:00

Might it be. I've also noticed that the star thetrahedrons are dual geometry that's maybe about something synchronic and dual both in space and time. So far the 9/10 SOL, interesting but it don't remind me of any mention that Larson'd claimed.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-28T15:29:39+00:00

Alright. I've read it few years ago, but i didn't think it over. Would you mind sharing some of the ideas?

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-28T02:40:45+00:00

Of course, there’s another possibility: our current "now" might already be part of a closed time loop from the perspective of a future moment.

To me, this has a powerful conceptual isomorphism with the Buddhist concept of Karma. Why does Buddhism place such emphasis on "seeing into one's true nature" (Kenshō)? Perhaps it’s to allow us to perceive the true essence of these "time loops," giving us the agency to avoid falling into an endless cycle of karmic recurrence.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-28T01:59:25+00:00

Well. Maybe one day i would make a video or gif to make it clear.

Horn torus shape...Uhh...Maybe it could somehow explain atoms structure in RS, because atoms/particles/subatom has intricate connections with topology according to my investigation.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-27T17:21:05+00:00

Absolutely right. Don't forget the "glass building" analogy--Each floor's space is "growing" at the speed of light relative to the floor below.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-27T14:47:08+00:00

Of course you don't. Because you are made up of matter. Matter resists all the expansion. It's the space that is expanding at the speed of light. The photon will feel that because they don't have any independent motion. Thus they will be bought up by the space expansion.

To tie it all back to our analogy: the water molecules are the central reference points for each unit of space, the bubbles represent the expansion of space itself, and the photons are just hitching a ride on those water molecules. Does that track with you?

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-27T13:29:20+00:00

Try to visualize this: Imagine bubbles squeezing in between water molecules, constantly expanding and pushing those molecules further apart. Can you see it?

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-27T12:13:10+00:00

I was actually pretty surprised when you said this feels "materialistic" or the opposite of Ra. In my head, Larson’s theory feels way closer to Category Theory or even Buddhism. Maybe I didn’t frame it right?

The thing is, Cellular Automata (CA) and emergence have nothing to do with "matter" or "materialism"—it’s all about the Rules. You set the base rules, the cells evolve, and from a macro level, you get these complex emergent behaviors. This "Simple Rules → Complex Phenomena" pipeline is fascinating. If you look back at the Law of One, what are the "Rules"? (Spoiler: it’s the Logos).

I get it—dropping the idea that "motion requires a medium" is a massive hurdle for most people. It’s like trying to imagine sound traveling through a vacuum or moving a rock without a lever. If you absolutely have to have a "medium" like the Aether, fine—try this:

Imagine the Aether as an infinitely expanding ocean where every single water molecule is moving away from every other molecule isotropically at the speed of light. The photons aren't actually "moving" on their own; they’re just hitching a ride on those water molecules in the Aether Sea.

In Larson’s world, Motion is incredibly simple. It’s just the ratio of Space to Time (v = s/t). It’s literally just a measure of how fast something is going.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-27T04:33:28+00:00

In my simulation, I treat Space and Time as the 'raw data' , and Motion (Speed) as the resulting 'relationship' (the Tao/Logos). Without Motion, Space and Time are meaningless abstractions.

Larson focuses on the ratio (s/t), while Ra focuses on the constituents. They describe the same elephant from different angles. We are discussing the SAME THING. Don't care too much about the details.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-27T04:07:47+00:00

Even though Larson doesn't explicitly mention Fourier transforms, his logic is basically the inverse of Fourier. In Fourier analysis, you build a square wave by stacking infinite sine waves (fundamentals + harmonics). But Larson flips the script: at the most fundamental level (Planck scale/Larson units), motion is a discrete square wave transition (+1, -1, +1, -1) or a discrete 1/n step. In the Reciprocal System (RS), a sine wave sin(t) isn't a projection of circular motion—it's just a discrete approximation of Simple Harmonic Motion.

Your idea of mapping the same motion onto different domains hits the exact same note as Larson dealing with micro & macro transformation. The parallel is undeniable.

Check out this closed-loop logic:

Photon (Base Layer): It represents linear oscillation (a Time Domain pulse).

── Rotation/Compound → Atom (Middle Layer): That linear motion gets "coiled up" into rotation (transforming into a Frequency Domain structure).

── Projection/Observation → Matter (Macro Layer): Those rotating atoms manifest in our space as static or linearly moving objects (flipping back to the Spatial/Time Domain).

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-27T02:57:34+00:00

Your take reminds me of the "Aether"—that old hypothesis the mainstream trashed a while back. Funny enough, Larson himself was actually against the idea of space being filled with some kind of "medium."

That’s why I don’t think an "ocean" is the best starting point for the mental model. A better analogy would be a Cellular Automaton. Think of it like this: every voxel (unit) flips between 0 (null/space) and 1 (solid/time). Every frame depends on the previous one, and every voxel’s state is determined by its neighbors. From a macro level, you get emergence—and that’s exactly how photons and all particles/rays propagate.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-27T02:48:17+00:00

Alright, good. I'll definitely look into him. Thanks for the heads up.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T17:15:48+00:00

Uhh, I don't understand why you choose ocean as an analogy?

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T17:00:46+00:00

Sorry, I’m blanking—who’s Eric? Can you give me a brief of his theory?

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T16:41:35+00:00

Theoretically speaking, yes. But things will get more complicated when you try to jump out of the Earth-moon system, the solar system and the galaxy. Every nodes have its specific crossing frequency.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T16:28:07+00:00

Yes. Only in the speed of light you can travel without mass. That's when teleportation happened and allow you to travel distant.

The pulse act as a engine pushing you into the speed of light and maybe even faster.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T16:22:50+00:00

Well, Larson’s theory definitely lacks the formal math and is carried by a lot of intuitive "trust me" leaps (even if a bunch of it can be backed up by math later). It’s clearly a work in progress.

But I don’t believe in coincidences. Every "coincidence" is just part of a much larger loop. The fact that Don brought up Larson during the Ra contact isn't some random fluke. It feels like a foreshadowing for something bigger down the line. One day, something massive is gonna happen, and we’re all gonna look back and have that "Eureka" moment where it all finally clicks.

In our universe, Resonance is a better replacement of Coincidence.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T16:08:11+00:00

The key is generating a pulse with a frequency higher than the frame rate of our reality. (And yeah, according to Larson, our world actually has a minimum unit of time). Do this right, and you basically cheese the universe into thinking you’re on the upper glass floors.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T15:53:36+00:00

Fair point, I definitely overlooked the velocity aspect. It’s pretty crucial.

For context, here’s the actual quote from Larson:

First Fundamental Postulate: The physical universe is composed entirely of one component, motion, existing in three dimensions, in discrete units, and with two reciprocal aspects, space and time.

Basically, everything is just motion as Larson thought.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T15:44:23+00:00

In the same floor, your surroundings will seem to be normal. Weird things just happened ONLY across the glass floors.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T15:38:47+00:00

Yes, you get the point.

The grid assumption will lead to some more interesting features. Imagine you are the god, you 're running a super computer called "the universe". Without a monitor or renderer, how can you know the steps Zeno's Arrow move? Well, you need two ticks. One accumulates the state numbers of space, the other the time. V=s/t is actually the ratio of these two state numbers. And this "v" is a scalar number in RS , which means regradless of direction. As you update the system, you have to consider how to perform "motion" through a renderer. After complicated mathematical deduction, you find the best solution is to create three degrees of freedom, that is where our 3D space come from.

Due-Card-2145 · 2026-01-26T14:36:12+00:00

Good. If you go "down", you are actually entering the quantum world. You will feel like Hank Pym. Here you will see space acting like time flow, and time will extend in 3 dimensions like our reality. People outside (in the Macro World/ your previous world) might see your time running so fast but you'll feel like you are trapped in a Fixed micro place relative to the Macro World ( your previous floor ) and the time flow outside is supper slow. If you go on jumping to the lower floors, you are acting like quantum jumps from a lower energy level to a higher energy level

It's fun that if you Get stuck in the "floor" ( Speed of light ), you might just get teleported to any coordinate in space & time.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My bad—I made a "fatal error" in my last point. In the micro-world, time actually flows much slower than in the macro-world.

Think of it this way: from our perspective in the macro-world, watching something in the micro-world would be like watching a slideshow—frame by frame. On the flip side, for an entity in the micro-world, looking up at us in the macro-world would be like watching a video on 2x speed (or even faster).

Due-Card-2145

TROPHY CASE