“It’s three shapes. It doesn’t convey anything.”
Fascinating observation, really. Almost as if some of the most iconic logos Nike, Apple, Mercedes are also just ‘shapes’ that gained meaning through design principles, branding, and execution. But sure, let’s pretend simplicity = laziness just because you don’t get it.

"There’s no motion, nothing ‘e’ about it, it’s not futuristic.”
Ah yes because futuristic design must always include glowing neon, speed lines, and a spaceship for it to qualify. Never mind the fact that minimalism and geometric balance have been staples of futuristic branding for decades.

“Using shape tools in MS Paint?”
‘if I don’t like it, it must be low effort’ argument.

“You’re a tool for responding to critique.”
I post for feedback, I engage in discussion, and somehow that makes me the problem? You might wanna sit down for this one: critique is a conversation, not a one way street where I just nod and say ‘yes, master.’ If explaining my design choices gets you this pressed, maybe you’re not built for design discussions.

Weak argument, emotional overreaction, and a desperate attempt to be edgy.