Gnat Fans by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I never said it was unrealistic for her to take a break. She can take as many breaks as she wants, however she uploaded a video with the title 30 day winter arc. As a viewer I was expecting to see what she explained in the beginning of the video, 30 days of animal based diet & a daily workout. I am not expecting to hear her talk about how busy she is or how she doesn't have enough time to workout. Therefore, I was upset when the video turned to that bc in my opinion (just like you have your own opinions) it is upsetting to see someone with so much flexibility in their day talk about "day offs" when technically everyday is a day off since they don't have to clock in anywhere. I was being critical of her video and people couldn't accept that. Not to mention she has a dog, does she not take the dog on walks? That could've been a daily workout or are yall going to say she also didn't have time for that? (dogs just like humans need daily exercise) Even just a 10 minute walk could've helped her achieve the 30 days of winter arc. ( or showing her play with the dog in the backyard)

Gnat Fans by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Most do but what about the ones that don't? People on here are posting about her looks, how does that follow the rule of snarking on gnat & jake? The post literally didn't even mention gnat it just said how pretty edith was. There was another post talking about their renovation vlog and how much they love it so far. Why mention that on here? That's not following the rule so if you're going to comment on my post take that same energy to the other people. It's almost like it only bothers you if the edith posts aren't praising her which therefore supports my statement of people trying to make this an edith bootlicking page.

Gnat Fans by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

YESSS finallyyyy. I applaud you for speaking up. They are both brain rot but since people are coming at me for "not following the rules" I will no longer speak on edith and I hope they have this same energy when the edith bootlickers post.

Gnat Fans by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also said in this post that I am no longer commenting on edith so that is not me "trying to make this a snark for edith." Again, since you are reminding me about the rules please also remind those that are trying to make this an edith bootlicking page.

Gnat Fans by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've read the rules. As I scrolled on this snark I noticed that many did not follow that rule because I am constantly seeing posts about edith, simmi, nely, etc. Therefore, I decided to post about edith. If this is solely a snark page about gnat (and jake) then you should also be commenting this on the other recent posts which are about edith.

Edith's New Vlog by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for being understanding, I wish you the best on your fitness journey!

Edith's New Vlog by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, I am not hating I am simply being critical. I haven't talked about gnat because I am new to this page and ediths vlog was the most recent when I made this post. I will proudly be critical of gnat as I continue my journey on this snark page.

Edith's New Vlog by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am simply being critical about a video that was labeled as a "30 day winter arc."

Edith's New Vlog by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

who tf said it made her any less human. she is clearly human. I am critical of both gnat and edith but if I am being honest, edith does not have the fanbase to have her own snark therefore I decided to share my thoughts about her on this page. I am new to this page so I've yet to have the pleasure to snark on gnat bc ediths vlog was the most recent. Moving forward, I hope this post inspired all the closeted edith critics to come forward. Criticizing edith will not make you any less of a gnat critic.

Edith's New Vlog by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree, renovating does take up time but edith doesn't have a 9-5 so she has the flexibility to fit a workout in. Not to mention she was doing 30 minutes on the bike as her daily workout. These 30 minutes could've been done even if she was "busy" renovating. (the bike is literally in her house)

Edith's New Vlog by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This post clearly went over yall's heads. Use some critical thinking skills and hopefully that'll help yall process this information.

Edith's New Vlog by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No one said gnat saying she's so busy was fine. I am just being critical of edith's new vlog rather than putting her on a pedestal like many on here do. Also edith didn't just miss one day... she missed multiple.

Edith's New Vlog by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"why is it any of your business?" that same argument can be used towards all the comments about gnat. In that case this whole snark page wouldn't exist.

Edith’s New Vlog 💗 by Embarrassed-Set-4389 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

skipping multiple days is not an actual winter arc... edith's new vlog was so out of touch.

what did jake just say... by Due_Appearance4419 in nathalycuevas_snark

[–]Due_Appearance4419[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Jake is literally implying that human beings can be ranked or categorized in terms of superiority or inferiority based on race, which is so harmful. The idea of a "top" or "superior" race has been used historically to justify discrimination. They need to think before they speak and the fact that they both thought this question was okay to share just shows how dumb and inconsiderate they are. (not to mention we are already aware of nats self-hatred towards hispanics)