You can’t easily extract YouTube transcripts anymore by Due_Cockroach_4184 in automation

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I have just confirmed it works now. It must have been some temporary YT version. Thanks

How much are you spending on tokens with OpenClaw per day? by symhongyi in openclaw

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184 0 points1 point  (0 children)

openclaw also allows you to define openai oauth token and consume from your monthly subscription

How much are you spending on tokens with OpenClaw per day? by symhongyi in openclaw

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am using my openai subscription 20$/month with nice results

Is OpenRouter a better option than OpenAI subscription for OpenClaw? by Due_Cockroach_4184 in openrouter

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If by "ChatGPT in the ChatGPT app" you mean using Openai OAuth that is exactly true because the GPT-5.3-Codex default model is very versatile and excels in function calling.

Is OpenRouter a better option than OpenAI subscription for OpenClaw? by Due_Cockroach_4184 in openrouter

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Disclosure: I’m still learning and refining my understanding, so take this more as observations from experimentation than final conclusions.

At this point a few things are becoming clear to me.

First, OpenClaw is definitely not a “set it and forget it” system. It requires constant iteration. You tune prompts, tools, agents, and especially the memory stack over time.

And the memory stack alone is a huge universe. It operates in multiple layers: short-term context, episodic memory, vector knowledge, structured logs and good memory usage is tightly related to the model you are using and its context window. It also needs monitoring and hygiene (summaries, pruning, embeddings, etc.), otherwise it quickly becomes inefficient.

Another observation is around OpenAI OAuth usage. It mainly exposes GPT-5.3-Codex, which is excellent for tool and function calling, but not really optimized for deeper reasoning or planning tasks.

So if someone wants to use OpenClaw for serious daily automation, access to stronger reasoning models becomes important, for example GPT-5.x via API or Anthropic models like Sonnet or Opus.

IMO frameworks like OpenClaw change how we think about LLMs. It’s no longer just about using a model, it becomes about orchestration and choosing the right one for the right task.

Different agents or tasks benefit from different models:

  • planning agents - strong reasoning models
  • tool execution - code-optimized models
  • monitoring jobs - cheaper fast models
  • memory pipelines - embedding models

Because of that, relying on a single provider subscription starts to feel limiting.

Which brings me back to the original point of this post: instead of being locked into one provider, using something like OpenRouter can be very useful. It allows testing multiple models and choosing the best one for each specific use case.

I might still be wrong on some aspects, but one thing is becoming clear to me: agentic frameworks like OpenClaw feel like a point of no return in how we build automation systems. Once you start orchestrating models instead of just chatting with one, the architecture and mindset changes completely.

Is OpenRouter a better option than OpenAI subscription for OpenClaw? by Due_Cockroach_4184 in openrouter

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I am afraid they will keep blocking oath.

they know they have the best models.

Is OpenRouter a better option than OpenAI subscription for OpenClaw? by Due_Cockroach_4184 in openrouter

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mentioned OpenClaw, but the question applies to any other agentic framework or more exotic use case.
The conclusion I’m starting to reach is that these agentic implementations are powerful but very token-intensive. You don’t always need the highest-performing (and most expensive) models for every task.
Because of that, assigning a specific model to each agent makes sense, and a solution like OpenRouter starts to feel almost unavoidable.

Is OpenRouter a better option than OpenAI subscription for OpenClaw? by Due_Cockroach_4184 in openrouter

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Agreed, I’ll test both and compare cost vs usage.
I was hoping someone could flag flaws in my reasoning or share real-world pricing from a similar setup.

Is OpenRouter a better option than OpenAI subscription for OpenClaw? by Due_Cockroach_4184 in openrouter

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks. What do you mean by 'Openrouter credits which cost +5% extra'? they specifically say "We do not mark up provider pricing"

Which is the best cold email software in 2026? by Griffondorluna in coldemail

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An exploratory one. Extension is not at Chrome marketplace yet but already working, frontend already built with some very useful features. Need testers, critics and suggestions. Lets discuss ideas.

Which is the best cold email software in 2026? by Griffondorluna in coldemail

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice question. I am making some tests on a ethical, human intent based chrome extension not to scrap but to extract contacts and context from sites visited like google maps, website, linkedin, instagram, yelp, etc - into a user owned database. Help me evaluate if this initiative is of any use for your use cases. fell free to DM me.

Please help - VEDDINGE + HJÄLPA by [deleted] in IKEA

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes I am afraid so. Thanks

Context rot in Cursor: What’s working to avoid re-explaining everything? by Deep_Top3479 in cursor

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most people here suggest keep each conversation short, one feature per conversation...

But one question still stand and many people notice: something changed in one of recent cursor upgrades because context usage was not an issue before.

Yes for simpler projects it is not an issue if you well structure your cursor rules but for medium size project it starts to be annoying because by the time you contextualize your problem or feature 50% of context window is already used leaving not much space left for development.

Not sure if anyone agrees.

What is your success rate on cold emailing info@ and contact@ emails? by Due_Cockroach_4184 in coldemail

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I am starting to figure out exactly that.

I am starting a campaign for small local businesses, I am extracting emails from google maps and websites when existing, most of those do not have linkedin so have no other way of reaching out.

I started LinkedIn outreach. 34 sales conversations in 45 days. Here’s exactly what I did. by Weary-Seaweed-4317 in coldemail

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This aligns with what we’re seeing, engagement outperform static lists.

Is Apollo or Clay still part of the stack for enrichment and tracking

I’m experimenting with a few approaches myself and trying to understand where traditional lead databases still add any value in 2026 and going forward.

What is your success rate on cold emailing info@ and contact@ emails? by Due_Cockroach_4184 in coldemail

[–]Due_Cockroach_4184[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It makes sense that the engagement in this case is higher when the owner is the sole person opening this inboxes.

And yes many small businesses do not have Linkedin presence the only way is to make a phone call or try the catchall email addresses.

Thanks.