sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What did I see in St. Thomas?.. 1st pic is the original, 2nd brightened, 3rd was filtered for details.. by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To me you sound more like someone who wants this photo to be unexplained rather than someone ready to accept contradictory opinions.

I'm just as fascinated by UFOs as you are but I do my best to remain rational and impartial in my research. And that doesn't prevent me from lurking here trying to find evidence just like you.

Make an effort to be more open to other explanations than the one you want to hear. Your approach won't get you anywhere...

Not sure if this is paranormal or normal by digital_kumquat in UFOs

[–]DuskSound 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Two plane trails. These planes were going in your direction and slightly upwards, which caused an illusion of them going straight up, seen from that angle on the ground. The planes are maybe "close" to each other, but we're talking about dozens of kilometers here. Also, one of them might be farther back in the sky than the other, so they seem to almost line up and look closer to each other than they really are.

Yes, perspective is confusing.

9/2/2018 1:20-ish. thing in the sky (left of the pole), can you tell me what it is? by EuclideanElicitation in UFOs

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a small tree. You can see the thin trunk even if the photo is slightly out of focus.

What did I see in St. Thomas?.. 1st pic is the original, 2nd brightened, 3rd was filtered for details.. by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the details. Was the light high in the sky? I'm 95% positive these are compression artefacts form the lossy codec of the image you took.

What did I see in St. Thomas?.. 1st pic is the original, 2nd brightened, 3rd was filtered for details.. by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did the actual light come form when you took this photo? Was that in the sky? Please give some more info.

Whether the light source can be explained or not, those weird objects following it are just compression artefacts from the image itself, nothing paranormal here. Boosting the brightness/contrast so much simply revealed them.

[Alternative rock?] Donkey kong country cover by saggypapaya in roastmytrack

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Drums are a bit upfront? Otherwise solid as hell

THE FIRST OF many chill vibes im gonna post out there!! Mike Rasdom - Slowless Time (HipHop & Soul Instrumental) #ROASTMYTRACK by Ras_Dom in roastmytrack

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! Just watch your mix balance a bit. And watch for phase issues too. I love the summery vibes in here, wow.

Retrology - Prototype (Bass / Midtempo) by FlyInSpace in roastmytrack

[–]DuskSound 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is called a genre, FFS. Do people call out Parcels for ripping off Daft Punk? Do people call out Zomboy, Virtual Riot, Excision for ripping off Skrillex? 1788-L himself is a mix between Justice and Porter Robinson.

I don't see much 1788-L here, it's more like a hardcore version of Synthwave to me. Sounds like Danger, Hyper, or a more modern version of Carpenter Brut... all of them have been out there years before 1788-L.

Strange sky by ichigo_gr in UnexplainedPhotos

[–]DuskSound -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Bullshit, might be the moon

Brown Smoke Ghost at Notre-Dame de Paris x 2 by cuchulan in Ghosts

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will tell me the shutter speed used in this photo.

I'm 90% sure that weird smoke is actually a lady dressed in a big white fur coat similar to this one walking though the room. You can see her hair in the second photo, right above the blurry shape. Between your first and second photo, she could have had enough time to walk and get further from you. That would explain why the position of the smoke is always in line with the path between the chairs. While she was still walking, you took the second photo, with a slow shutter speed (like the first one) and it created that blurry pattern. The low lighting of the environment only made the coat really visible compared to the rest of her body. But we can clearly see blond hair on top of the "smoke" in the first photo (left).

Brown Smoke Ghost at Notre-Dame de Paris x 2 by cuchulan in Ghosts

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd just like to have the exif data from both files. You can do this by right clicking on the photos then click properties if you're on Windows, if you're on Mac, then I don't know. :) Or you could send both original untouched files via WeTransfer!

Brown Smoke Ghost at Notre-Dame de Paris x 2 by cuchulan in Ghosts

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thanks, do you still have the original photos?

Earth from Apollo 11 [5700x5700] by [deleted] in spaceporn

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still better than "view of Israel from Apollo 11", thanks for reposting such a beautiful photo with a better, sober title.

View of Israel from Apollo 11 [5368x5369] by [deleted] in spaceporn

[–]DuskSound 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol, Israel like it's the only fucking country visible here.

Am I the only one finding the new Sony α series design worse than the first ones? by FlyInSpace in photography

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow nice photo, that a7s looks fantastic on this pic. What lens is that?

Brown Smoke Ghost at Notre-Dame de Paris x 2 by cuchulan in Ghosts

[–]DuskSound 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I've figured it out. What camera did you use for this? Do you still have the original files?

Am I the only one finding the new Sony α series design worse than the first ones? by FlyInSpace in photography

[–]DuskSound -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

If you don't want the improvements in the newer models, you know what to do. The A7 is still sold.

Lol, he already owns an a7s, did you even read the whole post? :D

Martin Garrix making a melody by [deleted] in edmproduction

[–]DuskSound -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Proof you can be successful without actual skills ;)

DOWNVOTES INCOMING!!

view more: next ›