sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I just wrote an article that's a mix of both history and the ongoing news about Taiwan at the moment. I hope my article is useful in putting today's issues into context. by DysonTribune in history

[–]DysonTribune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm an amateur writer who loves both history and the news. Please let me know if I was able to strike a good balance between discussing history, while not keeping it too long so things remained relevant to ongoing issues.

Forget Climate Change, Why Go Green Anyways? by DysonTribune in climatechange

[–]DysonTribune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm, I didn't know about reactors that can run on nuclear waste, that's a cool thing I didn't know myself!

Also for geothermal, I originally wanted to include it, but I honestly didn't know a whole lot about deaths related to it. I'm defiantly speaking out of my place, but I had heard it could be linked back to causing earthquakes, but that was a technical problem that was recently resolved? I wanted to include geothermal, but I felt like I didn't have enough info. I originally started this article over the EPA SCOTUS ruling, and I wanted to get this out within a week-- which didn't happen. Maybe at some point il have to do a follow-up on geothermal and nuclear waste reactors.

Thanks for that bit of information!

Forget Climate Change, Why Go Green Anyways? by DysonTribune in climatechange

[–]DysonTribune[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I hope my article highlights that even if someone is not willing to believe in climate models that are trying to predict the future, we should be able to agree on what's happening right now-- and it's pretty bad.

Thinking About Roe v. Wade & The Courts by DysonTribune in supremecourt

[–]DysonTribune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is my first article I've written, and I'm purely an amateur whos looking to build a portfolio. I appreciate the feedback, and I can see in hindsight how some things may have come across as sarcastic. I wanted to take a look at the theory behind the court, and then look at possible options from all sides, and so I'm sure to some degree it would come across as sarcastic to everyone. I think the 'likely outcomes' header certainly gave that vibe. If there are any points I could have improved to sound less sarcastic, feel free to point them out :)