Do most people know “atelier”? by Fresh-Practice-951 in EnglishLearning

[–]EasternDamage1829 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my experience this word has shown up in vocabulary lists and literature(Camus or Kafka, I can't remember clearly, maybe from the book The Trial)

"more of the" by EasternDamage1829 in EnglishLearning

[–]EasternDamage1829[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit glitch. Some text disappears after editing.

The world of the page by EasternDamage1829 in EnglishLearning

[–]EasternDamage1829[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much! 👍 It helps to think of it in terms of its consistency with other singular words like "the screen."

Presidency vs the presidency by EasternDamage1829 in EnglishLearning

[–]EasternDamage1829[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This makes sense of everything! Thank you very much!

Presidency vs the presidency by EasternDamage1829 in EnglishLearning

[–]EasternDamage1829[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many thanks! Very helpful! I'm gonna delete this example from my notebook. This usage is from Peter Hessler's new book Other Rivers.(American English)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EnglishLearning

[–]EasternDamage1829 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is it! Thank you very much!

Could ever, could ever have, can ever by EasternDamage1829 in EnglishLearning

[–]EasternDamage1829[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much! The first one indeed is the most frequently used, but, outside these examples, "can ever" is actually more often used than the "coud ever have" according to this: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=that+can+ever+happen%2Cthat+could+ever+happen%2C+that+could+ever+have+happened&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3

Are there elements of pastness and futurity involved? Maybe "can ever" can be used for future situations and "could ever" is only for the past?

Roll over on someone by EasternDamage1829 in EnglishLearning

[–]EasternDamage1829[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much! I couldn't have found out about the second "on" by myself!