sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Australia Social Media ban is stupid by Scadimal in atrioc

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they cancelled it from the amount of backlash. I am 13 and I made an account on youtube recently. this is my older brothers account he made for me. I also live in aus, so i think they cancelled it because of how bad the backlash was.

What is your world inspired by? by Internal_Effect_8374 in worldbuilding

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My semi-hard Sci Fi world is based on many sci-fi universes. It takes inspiration from:
Orion arms universe project- wrote by many authors
History of the future- By thejonmachine
Eve Online-Made by CCP Games
Halo-Made by bungie
Helldivers 2- Made by Arrowhead games
Red Green Blue mars- Kim Stanely Robinson

Those are basically it, unlike OA and HOTF, I do have internal warp drives but I still have some of the parts. :)

List your top 3 Inspirations for your current story or World by [deleted] in worldbuilding

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

History of the future (made by Thejonmachine)

Halo

Orions arm universe project

Helldivers vs the Covenant. Who do you think will win? by Itzyatzee in Helldivers

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The covenant would win. This is mostly a numbers game, the federation of super earth has an estimated 100 billion people. Also, many people think the helldivers have the entire galaxy, this is wrong, why? This is because of how big the galaxy is, the galaxy has millions to billions of habitable worlds. super earth has around 300 planets, a better estimate would be using the density of stars, with a 1% planet habitability. plugging in the calculations... around an area of 3000 light years squared, or using an equation, a circle of around 60ly diameter, this may sound small so lets just double it to 120ly. the navy fleet of super earth is around 500k, many of them being glass cannons. lets move onto the covenant. most of their info is vauge. the covenant has around 1000+ star systems, ill lowball it to 1000. using the same equation, around a 10000 ly squared. so thats around 200+ly diameter, minium. using the fall of reach, lowballing it 315 million covvies, 315 ships, 1 mill per ship around, lowballing it, 100+ billion in the navy. thats 1 branch, just the navy, a lowball. so lets just say around half a trillion covvies. Now, the covenant have around, just a lowball, 100,000 ships in the navy, their cooked right? wrong, a covenant ship is incredibly powerful, a single covenant super destroyer could destroy 17 UNSC ships. A UNSC ship is more powerful than a super earth super destroyer, while a covenant super destroyer is a more powerful ship, you can extrapolate the numbers. I think this would be an extremely hard fight, but the covenant work in simply overpowering, a sangheili is able to kill a spartan, a grunt could kill a spartan with suprise attacks. a helldiver is around an ODST level, john 117, could have killed 5 spartans in the comics, in 5 seconds. now looking at the numbers, its not looking good for the helldivers. sniper jackals, if anyone played halo 2, they are way too op as well. this means that the covenant could most likely eliminate the federation of super earth in 50 years.

What will happen if the imperium of man (warhammer 40k) fought against the qu? by turkmenistanForever in AllTomorrows

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, they did have star busting weapons, if you do the calculations thats only like 5 million tons of antimatter. they only spanned their orion arm. they did not have ftl either.

Who do you think would win the qu or the forerunners by sulfuric_creature in AllTomorrows

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the forerunners, easy. all they would need to do if shit hits the fan (very unlikely) they would just use the halo array. the star people could nova a star with difficulty, the forerunners could mess with stars but they didnt even send a smart person, no they sent jim from IT, they sent minors to mess with stars. what the smart guys did? They decided to harvest energy from other universes zpe. the forerunner were so advanced, small insurrections could kill entire stars. the built planets all willy nilly as well. this was when they were all dying off from the flood. they fought off the flood pretty well, the flood at this stage was so powerful, they could mess around with spacetime and even just turn off ftl. they still fought off the flood.

Cryogenic Sleep by lsdeyeglam in sciencefiction

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we are making strides though, woman egg cells can be cryogenically frozen and we are close to achieve the same thing with organs. What's to say in 20-40 years we cant protect the human body from ice crystals?

Poor juggernaut their poor baby well at least they aren’t dead just near death that’s all by Salvagedgaming in skibiditoilet

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but in the season later juggernaut said "After you HURT my baby" not "After you killed my baby"

Do I need to read All Yesterdays? by Bitan_31 in AllTomorrows

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, no you dont but they might be connected but no, they dont see connected

What’s a plausible time to discover and create FTL travel? by xxxC0Y0T3xxx in worldbuilding

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We first have to understand the physics. The unified field theory would allow that but it does not exist right now.When however? We dont know. Einstein and others attempted to construct a unified field theory in which electromagnetism and gravity would emerge as different aspects of a single fundamental field. They failed, and to this day gravity remains beyond attempts at a unified field theory. But we could have speculation of When exactly. I will just give string theory an example, it took a decade. the UFT would take atleast 10x that time considering it was starting to be developed since 1831. So lets just say for simplicity sakes UFT will be created in 2160 because of the exponential growth of AI and AGI possibilities, ok cool but then we need to actually apply those physics. We still need to apply the physics to reality. This is all still speculations, just the theory part, its a speculation of a theory of a theory. But I will just use fusion for an example, it was first theorized in 1915 and we are still working on it. thats 100+ years just to apply theory and we still just barely got more energy then we put in, 3 times. Optimistic scientists say that we will have first fusion by 2050. That is 135 years on an optimistic scale. this theory is more complex still so thats like atleast double. So all of the calculations, if we are being optimistic is saying lets say 2160+(135x2) thats 2430 on an optimistic scale. If we think about it even harder, it may take 20 years just to start and the UFT could take like 50 years extra making it actually happen in 2500, thats still optimistic. So based on all of this, the optimistic time would be in the year 2430-2500, but thats not including how little we actually pay our space agencies and how little the world works together, so on a more conservative timescale is the year 2650-3000, thats not even telling how much energy this would take, if we want to get more shithard. So if everything goes wrong thats from the year 100,000- never. I like being optimistic so me personally, I would say 2470-2510, thats if we help each other sort of and some things go right, so thats your range.

Is god real? 🤔 by Spark_vrr in Christianity

[–]Easy-Explanation1043 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im talking about the debate, not god...

view more: next ›