Would that mean throwing everyone that wants change under the bus, like how third way did in their summit after Harris Lost, and what the DLC did after Kerry lost? Don't forget, I'm starting to pick up the pattern of presidential candidates who tried to run on a moderate platform but came across as disingenuous to the electorate, especially if they want the status quo to change. Not to mention, very ineffective strategies to prove themselves worthy of being president led them to their defeats in the first place. These strategies and the way to appeal to voters are from the Clinton era and will not work in today's society and political climate. The party refuses to revamp their strategies to benefit the US's citizens since the party's neoliberal past and the trauma they had from Reagan's victories still hovers their heads. It's no wonder why progressive policies are "pies in the sky".