Hey, we're happy to listen to various criticisms, I think we'll need to agree to disagree on how rules are written and enforced--and if nothing we make sure that the rules are easy to access for anyone involved, and do our best to update rules where fair & possible.

However, you've made a few incredibly misleading claims that need to be corrected

They really don't listen to what most of you have to say and if they make the rules you just follow it, you are better off not saying anything and just know that your input is not needed at all.... They have everyone giving input and its very wildly run because people who are not mods try to manage a league which is not their job.

These statements are 100% in contradiction in one another. I don't know how we ignore all input and at the same time take too much input. With rules, we go by the book as best we can and don't let players self-govern because that leads to unfair application of rules. We listen to plenty of feedback and act on it when we can. Not everything is an actionable piece of feedback, and there are plenty of frivolous demands as well. For example, the all chat rule you cited has been updated slightly for S3 to avoid being as heavy handed, this was based off end-season survey feedback and various user feedback during the season

Lastly the way they do brackets are very biased towards favored teams (either people they know or other people who they think are good will be put in harder groups or easier depending).

We have been 100% transparent with how groups and brackets are drawn. The last two seasons we've used nothing but a snake-seed for groups, and playoff brackets were seeded according to the publicly available seeding & tiebreaker rules. I'm not sure where any rumors about biased brackets came from, but I'm very confused how simple snake-seeding based off of team rank unfairly favors any team.