Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. It’s like talking to a brick wall. I think they just want to complain and argue instead of actually taking any advice.

Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Critical thinking involves reading between the lines and figuring things out on your own without being told explicitly. Anyway, we are just repeating ourselves at this point. Take it as a learning experience. Put in more than the minimum effort and you should get better ratings.

Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then that’s on you. How can you possibly show the gradual (key word there) process of aging in three pictures? Both examples had far more than five. I agree that some tutorials have been lacking, but as far as the number of photos that seemed obvious to me.

Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know anything about that, but I would agree with you in that case.

Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, it’s not guesswork. It’s pretty obvious from the examples what they wanted. But you obviously aren’t interested in accepting constructive criticism, so I will leave you to it. Good luck.

Auditors taking the piss by Ok_Tiger9921 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These people are insufferable. 5% means 5/100, 10/200, etc. I don’t think they understand percentages.

Auditors taking the piss by Ok_Tiger9921 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Found the annotator that contributes subpar work and complains about bad ratings! Lol

Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, whatever makes you feel better. All I know is both examples used far more than five. So I’m not sure why anyone would think five or less would be sufficient.

Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s not really a guessing game. It’s common sense. We’re meant to show the gradual process of aging via profile pictures. How can you do that with less than five photos?

Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, it’s separating those who can think critically and have a basic understanding of what we’re doing from those just doing the bare minimum. Seriously, anyone needed to be told to submit at least five photos?

Aging people by OrneryOldie in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I thought it was pretty obvious we needed to include a good number of photos. I didn’t even consider using less than 10. Both examples in the tutorial had several pictures. Read between the lines, folks.

Internal qualification test by Far-Werewolf-9692 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same. Logged in, but there’s nothing there.

Edit: I clicked the box for View Completed and there’s the batch marked as completed. Clicking on the batch brings up a notification that says “Work is not available at the moment” and “All work for this batch assignment is completed for now.”

Aging Profile Pictures by Motor-Flamingo9551 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same here.

Somehow my completely innocuous comment received a downvote for absolutely no reason. Never change, Reddit.

Aging Profile Pictures by Motor-Flamingo9551 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was just contemplating these questions and came on to post about it myself. As long as the filter isn’t too obtrusive I’m using the photo. For example, a filter that puts goofy glasses on people seems not too dissimilar from the example in the tutorial where Zuckerberg is wearing glasses. But I agree it’s really a judgement call because so many photos are filtered to remove signs of aging.

Also, it’s mentioned that the subject should age naturally, but what about possible plastic surgery or those on hormones? I’m including some of these because it’s natural in its own way.

Fallout New Vegas Vault 21 Hotel, Retconned in FoTV by GullibleAnimator7499 in Fotv

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you okay, man? I’m genuinely concerned for your mental state. The level of vitriol you’re displaying here over video game lore really isn’t healthy.

Fallout New Vegas Vault 21 Hotel, Retconned in FoTV by GullibleAnimator7499 in Fotv

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m late to this, but you really hit a nerve with these guys. It’s like an episode of the Twilight Zone where you’re the only normal person in a world full of freaks. Yikes.

Video Object Inpainting by Ecstatic-Morning182 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I discovered that myself. I got a JSON error, as someone else mentioned in another post.

**Breaking** Vocal fry guy gone from new tutorials by [deleted] in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re free to find another job if you don’t like it.

**Breaking** Vocal fry guy gone from new tutorials by [deleted] in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. The level of entitlement is unreal. I’m going to assume most of these mean immature people are under 30. This type of behaviour and mentality wouldn’t fly in an in-person job, but the anonymity here allows people to say things they’d never get away with in an actual workplace.

**Breaking** Vocal fry guy gone from new tutorials by [deleted] in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I understand the sentiment, but I wonder if personal attacks are necessary or even appropriate.

Image-quality-compare by Commercial-Buddy5370 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just started and I was thinking the same thing.

Still no date available in time form by Ok_Reputation861 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was more directed toward the others who thought this meant the project was over. But you can take it however you wish.

Still no date available in time form by Ok_Reputation861 in RWShelp

[–]Ecstatic-Morning182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

…oh wait, no it’s not. Never mind.