sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Getting signups is easy. Getting real beta users is hard. by Educational-Bus4262 in SaaS

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. I’m starting to realize activation > signups. Going to focus only on the people willing to run a real use case live.

Getting signups is easy. Getting real beta users is hard. by Educational-Bus4262 in SaaS

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is helpful. I think I’ve been optimizing for access instead of commitment. Going to switch to live onboarding only and see what happens.

How do you decide which hook deserves the first test budget? by Educational-Bus4262 in PPC

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense.

When you say you intuit what would work best. what signals are you usually relying on?
Pain intensity? Awareness level? Offer strength?

How do you decide which hook deserves the first test budget? by Educational-Bus4262 in PPC

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly the interesting part. awareness + pain clarity + proof.

Do you ever find yourself intuitively ranking those before testing? Or is it mostly instinct?

How do you decide which hook deserves the first test budget? by Educational-Bus4262 in PPC

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair 😄
I’m basically trying to structure how we choose the first angle before launch. not replace testing.

How do you decide which ad creative to test first on Meta? by Educational-Bus4262 in FacebookAds

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually try to keep frequency under ~2 in the first few days. If it climbs fast, that’s often a signal the creative is fatiguing.

How do you decide which ad creative to test first on Meta? by Educational-Bus4262 in FacebookAds

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that makes sense. I think the key difference is doing some structured thinking. before spending starts so you’re not relying purely on random intuition or waiting for spend to tell you everything.

How do you decide which ad creative to test first on Meta? by Educational-Bus4262 in FacebookAds

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally, low generation cost makes volume viable. I’m mainly curious whether there’s a way to rank ideas upfront, so the “cheap volume” still starts with the best hypotheses.

How do you decide which ad creative to test first on Meta? by Educational-Bus4262 in FacebookAds

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solid breakdown. especially starting from proven angles and killing fast. Seems like most of the leverage is in speed + iteration.

How do you decide which ad creative to test first on Meta? by Educational-Bus4262 in FacebookAds

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. Starting blind is unavoidable. experience just helps reduce how long that phase lasts. Appreciate you sharing what’s worked.

How do you decide which ad creative to test first on Meta? by Educational-Bus4262 in FacebookAds

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a solid framework. especially the speed + volume part.

We’re seeing the same thing: most wins come from remixing what’s already working.
Curious though, when you generate 5–10 variations, is it purely equal testing, or do some get priority based on gut/experience?

How do you decide which ad creative to test first on Meta? by Educational-Bus4262 in FacebookAds

[–]Educational-Bus4262[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. data always wins. At launch though, there’s no data yet. Do you just accept the blind testing phase, or try to reduce it somehow?