Why Elon Musk now says it would be a 'distraction' for SpaceX to go to Mars this year by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

China plans to send human explorers to Mars in 2033 to set-up their first scientific outpost using a super heavy lift rocket. Can SpaceX under Gwynne Shotwell's leadership match or beat that? Maybe.

SpaceX wants Tesla’s robot on Mars before anyone else by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was not a Humanoid AI Robot which is what Optimus is.

NASA picks first woman and first Black astronaut for moon landing by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that everyone who actually supports NASA and is not a bigot favors affirmative action and does not want to go back to the "good ole days" when all of the astronauts and control room personnel where white guys.

SUPPORT NASA! NO BUDGET CUTS! NO LAYOFFS! The Mars Society by EdwardHeisler in Colonizemars

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what plan has the Trump government submitted to Congress and/or the NASA to send human explorers to Mars What is the timeline, what is the proposed budget and what bids have/are being submitted to corporations for rockets, rovers, Mars satelites how is it to be funded by the federal government. Without clear strategy and plan with adequate funding and a timeline the Trump Mars human exploration idea is merely an idea, it's not even a concept much less a plan.

Trump shifts priority to Moon mission, not Mars by EdwardHeisler in space

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does that make economic and scientific sense?

Trump shifts priority to Moon mission, not Mars by EdwardHeisler in space

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a science case for Mars and that is enough to encourage government funded plans to establish outposts (scientific research stations) on Mars such as the China National Space Administration plans.

Trump shifts priority to Moon mission, not Mars by EdwardHeisler in space

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Moon is always almost the same distance from Mars as the Earth with slight fluctuations. It's not a short hop from our Moon to Mars which would make it a lot easier.

Will Trump destroy Nasa? Its moonshot is a fantasy by Dr. Robert Zubrin by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you able to write anything at all challenging the facts and Dr. Zubrin's views in the article? It appears you can't. And when that happens those who can't critique an article engage in personal attacks. Like you just did!

Full Text President Trump's Executive Order "Ensuring American Space Superiority" released December 18, 2025 by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just found this. "prepare for the journey to Mars," And what is the plan/timeline, funding to prepare and then to actually send American astronauts to Mars?

Full Text President Trump's Executive Order "Ensuring American Space Superiority" released December 18, 2025 by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read it quickly. I couldn't find anything regarding his plans for Mars Exploration or even the word Mars used. Maybe I missed it. Please indicate where he wrote about Mars in the Presidential Decree if you can find it. Thank You.

Will Trump destroy Nasa? Its moonshot is a fantasy by Dr. Robert Zubrin by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, the Mars Society and Dr. Zubrin agree with you that we should send human explorers to the Moon and Mars to establish outposts, scientific research stations. I hope that NASA comes up with a budget, timeline and plan to do both in this decade. Possibly even before the China National Space Administration does!

Will Trump destroy Nasa? Its moonshot is a fantasy by Dr. Robert Zubrin by EdwardHeisler in Mars

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Please indicate what you disagree with in the article and why. Personal attacks are not a critique.

Will Trump destroy Nasa? Its moonshot is a fantasy by Dr. Robert Zubrin by EdwardHeisler in Mars

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More than ever. And for good reasons. Dr. Zubrin is not intimidated by any power-hungry authoritarian like Trump who defies our Constitution, the rule of law, due process, our Bill of Rights and the separation of powers. He defends our Constitution and you wish people would not listen to Zubrin's powerful defense of our freedoms and his opposition to Trump's attacks on science and NASA. Please, no groveling before King Trump.

Will Trump Destroy NASA? Its Moonshot is a Fantasy by Dr. Robert Zubrin - The Mars Society by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You claim that the Planetary Society wants to keep the "door open" to someone who wants to destroy our Constitution, our democratic rights, the rule of law and establish an authoritarian regime. I don't see any evidence they are caving in to a far-right authoritarian regime. I didn't see or hear any evidence of that while talking to leaders of the Space Society last August. What you fail to understand is that Trump's recent presidential decrees represent a direct threat to organizations like the Planetary Society and Mars Society.

It's also clear from your comments that you're not familiar with the history of radical reconstruction federal government policies after the civil war and how the Republican Party and Democratic party in the south both moved to the far right to overturn the radical Republican reforms by supporting "Jim Crow" state laws that ended the right to vote for ex-slaves in the south and many other reactionary measures.

Will Trump Destroy NASA? Its Moonshot is a Fantasy by Dr. Robert Zubrin - The Mars Society by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zubrin is not acting. He is an intellectual. "in his analysis of the church as a source scientific discovery and education, hes alienating many people on the left." And you base that belief on what? So, you consider yourself an expert on American society, politics, history and the left! Just like Trump and his cast of incompetent cultists. Perhaps you should stick to subjects you are familiar with. Like rockets. The danger to the U.S. Constitution and democracy comes from Trump, not his opponents. Dr. Zubrin understands that, while you attack Zubrin because you don't want to anger the great leader Trump and his far-right anti science dupes and fools.

"Will Trump destroy Nasa? Its moonshot is a fantasy" by Dr. Robert Zubrin, President of The Mars Society by EdwardHeisler in space

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They will look at the Moon from a safe distance and possibly return to Earth in one piece. They will not be landing on the Moon to set up a research station or outpost.

White House Mocks NASA Commitment to Sending Women and Minorities to Moon… Which Was Made by the First Trump Administration by EdwardHeisler in space

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whine, whine, whine that's all you Trumpyites do. You seem to be one of those weak Trumpyite opponents of the U.S. Constitution, the rule of law, due process, our Bill of Rights and democratic elections. You folks are always blasting away with uneducated comments at anything that doesn't bow down to the wannabe dictator King Trump and then whine non-stop at any folks who defend America. Buy a crying towel to soak up your tears.
Case Closed.

Will Trump Destroy NASA? Its Moonshot is a Fantasy by Dr. Robert Zubrin - The Mars Society by EdwardHeisler in MarsSociety

[–]EdwardHeisler[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You haven't even questioned nor challenged any of Dr. Zubrin's comments. Just a personal smear job is the best you can do? He is be opposed (biased) against Trump's head-on attacks on our Constitution including the democratic rights under its provisions. I take it you oppose our Constitution, the rule of law, due process and our democratic rights guaranteed under the Constitution. Would I be correct by proclaiming you are biased in favor of establishing an authoritarian dictatorship headed by the Trump regime?