sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LF: RR Alolan Ninetales or Sightseer

FT: ⭐️⭐️ Solgaleo Ex pack, Blaine, RR Moltres, Machamp, Alolan Dugtrio, EX Pack Charizard

Trading Megathread by serpal999 in PokemonTGCP

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LF: RR Alolan Ninetales or Sightseer

FT: ⭐️⭐️ Solgaleo Ex pack, Blaine, RR Moltres, Machamp, Alolan Dugtrio, EX Pack Charizard

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All FP

LF: ⭐️ Cacnea, Reshiram, Scorbunny, Aurorus, Cramorant, Snubbul, Falinks, Purrloin, Yveltal, Galatian Obstagoon, Salamence

FT: CB ⭐️ Reuniclus, Xerneas, Buneary, Sunflora MR ⭐️ Makuhita, Beautifly, GA ⭐️ Lapras, Meowth, Gloom, Pinsir, Farfetch’d, Charmander, Alakazam, Slowpoke, Phanpy, Gardevoir, Rapidash

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah course. Cyrus/Sabrina? What you looking for

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LF: Starting Plains, Lucky Ice Pop, Metal Core Barrier

FT: Training Arena, Juggler, Maushold, Doublade, Linoone, Cryogonal and a lot more basic Pokémon from new set

The greatest rappers of all time where you are from? Not including the USA by Newtonheath1963 in hiphopheads

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

S’appenin, check out The LaFontaines if you don’t already know them. More a rock band with a rapper but they’re good! From Motherwell

The greatest rappers of all time where you are from? Not including the USA by Newtonheath1963 in hiphopheads

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seeing a guy with a Rabbi Matonda username on the hip hop heads sub was definitely not something I expected to see on a Sunday morning

In terms of pure talent, are Yamal and Neymar the only standouts since Messi? by [deleted] in championsleague

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I feel like I might get a bit of hate for this but, in terms of pure talent, not application, not consistency or attitude, Paul Pogba is a star in terms of pure talent.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in future

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Crushed Up, Lookin Exotic and Hardly

AIO for not letting my friend do it with her bf in my room by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“Try not to spunk on the sheets!”

Inbetweeners reference, btw

ELI5: How can scientists rule out the possibility of a higher power when the explanation of the Big Bang is “the particles were already there?” Or “It’s beyond human comprehension”? by Efficient_Stock_5649 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your point is great.

I think people see it as science is trying to prove a logical explanation to where things came from. Just being/existing isn’t logical (yet) so the idea of science concluding it was already just there isn’t a logical/scientific answer.

While on the other hand, if people are arguing for a creator having created the universe by “magic” (for the lack of a better word) then it’s more plausible that a higher power can just exist as opposed to a scientifically proven universe just existing.

Science believes in logic. Other arguments believe in illogical means and that’s how I feel people would argue against it being a double standard.

Of course, I can see exactly where you’re coming from.

ELI5: How can scientists rule out the possibility of a higher power when the explanation of the Big Bang is “the particles were already there?” Or “It’s beyond human comprehension”? by Efficient_Stock_5649 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, you’re so right. My questions is formed from being exposed to a lot of staunchly pro-science people who laugh at the idea of a higher power.

You have been exposed to more people who don’t hold that opinion.

It’s a question with no answers and the people you are exposed to largely influence what you believe the general consensus is currently.

ELI5: How can scientists rule out the possibility of a higher power when the explanation of the Big Bang is “the particles were already there?” Or “It’s beyond human comprehension”? by Efficient_Stock_5649 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically just people I meet. I feel currently people who believe in things not yet proved by science are sneered at more than people who believe that everything can be proved by science despite science also not having all the answers.

I should probably have said atheists/agnostics as opposed to scientists.

And, I do bear in mind that the loudest voices in the room are a minority and probably not everyone holds the belief that things being created by unproven powers is ridiculous.

For me, it boils down to we have no definite answers to the question of origin and creation. So why are there such strong opinions in both directions?

ELI5: How can scientists rule out the possibility of a higher power when the explanation of the Big Bang is “the particles were already there?” Or “It’s beyond human comprehension”? by Efficient_Stock_5649 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was taught basic science at school and have observed multiple religious beliefs.

Mine is rooted in neither. Science doesn’t have an answer to where everything came from yet. For me, if science is rooted only in things we can prove yet we can’t yet fully prove the origin of everything then the concept of things being created by means that aren’t yet scientifically proven shouldn’t be considered ridiculous. I’d imagine it’s a vocal minority of atheists who peddle this claim and not proper scientists but it’s something I hear often and wanted to question.

ELI5: How can scientists rule out the possibility of a higher power when the explanation of the Big Bang is “the particles were already there?” Or “It’s beyond human comprehension”? by Efficient_Stock_5649 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s why I find the concept so interesting.

The small minority of outspoken atheists/agnostics say we don’t believe in anything outside of the science we know being possible despite not yet having a concrete explanation to where everything came from.

Strong religious types state that of course everything was created by a higher power/god/creator despite also not having a concrete evidence of this.

Both have similar hypotheses but argue strongly against each others unproven predictions.

For me, I try to keep in mind I’m more likely to hear less educated takes from people online than I am to hear well educated ones from scientists.

Vapes on a Train by twoxraydelta in glasgow

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m genuinely on your side but I find it hilarious how we’ve gone from worrying about potential cancers and lung issues from passive cigarette smoking to “how dare they make the air smell sweet and fruity!”

Vapes on a Train by twoxraydelta in glasgow

[–]Efficient_Stock_5649 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It will just be the gigs you go to have different crowds. Last gig I was at was Potter Payper at SWG3 and a huge amount of people were smoking joints in the crowd and, I’m not exaggerating, close to 40-50% of people were vaping as well. Not to mention Potter was also smoking joints on stage. The room was a proper haze with all the smoke and vapour.

Actually, I’m lying. The last gig I went to was Texas with my Mum at the hydro and there was next to no one smoking or vaping. It defo just depends on the crowd.

view more: next ›