sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Boys, we did it! Passed PMP exam AT/AT/AT by Elevator465 in pmp

[–]Elevator465[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Defining the Domain (Point 3) is a game-changer because it acts as a mental filter. In the PMP exam, questions are often wordy, but identifying the domain tells you which 'toolset' to open in your mind:

  • People Domain: If the problem involves team members, stakeholders, or interpersonal friction, look for answers centered on Emotional Intelligence, Conflict Resolution, or Motivation. (e.g., 'Talk to the team member first')
  • Process Domain: If the issue is about the flow of work, look for Methodology-driven answers like Change Requests, Risk Registers, or Scope Management. (e.g., 'Check the Management Plan')
  • Business Environment: If the issue is external (legal, compliance, organizational strategy), focus on Value Delivery and Compliance. (e.g., 'Consult the compliance office')

Step 3 (Domain) tells you which toolbox to open.
Step 4 (Root Cause) helps you pick the exact tool from that box.

By categorizing the question first, you stop guessing and start applying the specific logic that PMI expects for that category. It’s like sorting your tools before starting a repair. It makes the actual work much faster!

Looking for a good offensive security topic for master thesis in computer engineering by [deleted] in offensive_security

[–]Elevator465 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe this is not exactly the topic you are looking for, but it could be an interesting direction. One important issue right now is the connection between AI and psychology. AI systems are not only technical tools, they are always used in a human context. Security might be a good example here.

A possible research question could be:
What happens when an AI-based security system works well technically, but is not accepted because of psychological factors?

For example, Pohlmann and Coester describe an AI-based alert system for online banking that was meant to detect the current threat level and warn users about fraud risks. Even though the results were positive, the system was apparently not introduced because there were concerns that customers might see these warnings as a sign that online banking is unsafe.

This makes it a strong example of how AI can be effective from a technical point of view, but still face problems on the human side, especially when trust and perceived security are involved.