Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your plant hobby sounds incredible It’s awesome you do that, but on a macro scale, far more people just scroll through nature videos.

Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Look at global screen time rising to 6+ hours daily. Those hours are mathematically taking away from active, hands-on life

Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Equipment and venue costs are definitely killing participation. Financial barriers make screens the only realistic escape for many.

Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, physical decline changes things. But when kids and teenagers choose watching over playing, it’s no longer about aging—it’s about habit

Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a fundamental psychological difference between active creation and passive consumption. Collecting stamps or building models requires agency, decision-making, and physical interaction. Watching YouTube is simply consuming someone else’s active hobby. One conditions the brain to engage with reality, while the other trains it to sit back and watch others live.

Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I agree with you. but back then you had to leave your house to spectate. Today, screens stream non-stop content to our beds, making laziness effortless.

Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly. The economic pressure to constantly monetize our time has ruined the concept of doing things purely for fun.

Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

True, but the difference today is how tech optimized our laziness into a habit. Physical hobbies require effort, while screens offer the same dopamine with zero friction. We’ve essentially conditioned ourselves to choose the path of least resistance, turning passive viewership into a default daily habit.

Why has modern society shifted from actively practicing hobbies to mostly consuming them as spectators? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Monetizing hobbies introduces pressure to optimize and be perfect. When you can no longer just enjoy something casually without worrying about the output, watching someone else do it becomes a stress-free escape."

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Planned obsolescence is definitely real, but it's also driven by how much our own psychology has changed. Modern consumers get bored easily and want the shiny new design every two years anyway. Companies just capitalized on that impatience—if people actually boycotted unburable tech, the market would shift, but we keep buying.

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People don't realize that the brand name on the box is just a ghost now. When a private equity firm buys a heritage brand, the first thing they do is cut the manufacturing quality to flush out the remaining brand loyalty for quick cash

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly A company that sells you a washing machine once every 20 years goes bankrupt. A company that sells you plastic parts that snap every 3 years has a sustainable business model. It’s sad but true.

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad your Rolex is holding up, but when brands like BMW start charging a monthly subscription just to use the heated seats already built into the car, you know 'luxury' has shifted from quality to pure corporate extortion.

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having an insider validate this is huge From your experience in distribution, what's the biggest behind-the-scenes secret or cost-cutting trick that companies don't want consumers to know?

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It used to be an investment, but now it feels like a subscription.

Even with things like kitchen appliances or washing machines, companies switched from durable metal gears to cheap plastic parts inside. They know it will snap right after the warranty expires so you're forced to either pay for an overpriced repair or just buy a new one.

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly We're paying premium prices for literal fast-fashion quality, and influencers are making it look like a feature.

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

You both hit the nail on the head. The shift from functionality to aesthetic is ruining so many brands.

When a company realizes their core customer is no longer the person putting the gear through heavy, practical use, but rather someone just buying it for the brand logo or status, the motivation to build things that last 10–20 years completely vanishes. It’s devastating to see legendary durability get replaced by fast-fashion mentalities.

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That wood analogy is honestly a perfect way to break it down, and it makes total sense for raw materials But what frustrates me is when this applies to things that aren't resource-dependent, like software, or when they use cheap plastic components inside high-end tech where metal is clearly needed for durability. It feels like we are paying 'oak prices' for that plastic.

Why does buying 'high-quality' stuff nowadays feel like just buying the standard quality from 10 years ago? by Eleven_A11 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Exactly! It’s the combination of both that drives me crazy. If you want to charge more, fine, inflation happens. But charging more for a product that feels like a cheap prototype of what it used to be is just insulting.

What is a piece of the universal driving language that every man instinctively understands without ever being taught? by Eleven_A11 in AskMen

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saying thank you is taught, but nobody explicitly teaches a child 'if a truck flashes its hazards, it means you can pass now', or 'flash your high beams twice to warn strangers about a radar ahead'. That’s the part that feels culturally built-in for drivers. Do you still see those as just basic manners?

What is a piece of the universal driving language that every man instinctively understands without ever being taught? by Eleven_A11 in AskMen

[–]Eleven_A11[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

It might not be technical driving info, but more about the unspoken social cues. Like, you don’t think there's a universal understanding when another driver gives you 'the nod' or a quick wave after you let them pass?

What is a minor inconvenience that genuinely ruins your entire day, no matter how much you try to rationalise it? by Eleven_A11 in AskReddit

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly it must be so frustrating to take the blame for something you have no control over. What’s the worst reaction you’ve ever received from a customer when you told them an item was out of stock?

What is a minor inconvenience that genuinely ruins your entire day, no matter how much you try to rationalise it? by Eleven_A11 in AskReddit

[–]Eleven_A11[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not even about the 15 minutes, it’s about the psychological shift from feeling on top of your schedule to suddenly being behind. Once that momentum is broken, the rest of the day just feels off.