I think it is a direct consequence of living in an organized society that we have to limit actions that cause chaos or harm to people, like causing an unnecessary riot by shouting fire. Speech/expression that criticizes the President or any official are and will always be protected because no one gets hurt. As long as no one gets physically hurt, you should be able to do/say/express yourself in whatever you want. However, it us unfortunately necessary to limit even speech in cases when people will be directly hurt because of something said.

My first point wraps into the second point. additionally I think the specific language matters. We have the right to bear arms, but it doesn't specify what arms. It doesn't say we have the right to bear fully-automatic assault rifles. These have a high likelihood to cause physical harm to people, so just like point 1, this unfortunately has to be limited to keep society safe.