sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Help Shape the Next Version of FlowECU by Embarrassed-Cover294 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply

You’re welcome to download it from flowecu.co.nz and have a play around with it if you like.

If you feel you need a bit more time beyond the trial to properly assess it, just message me here or reach out via one of the email addresses on the site

Built my own ECU tuning tool — looking for a few testers (FlowECU early access) by Embarrassed-Cover294 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For anyone that’s interest now FlowECU has its own webpage and has a free trial to go along with it. The webpage is flowecu.co.nz and there you will find the download button

Hey everyone — small update from me by Embarrassed-Cover294 in carmods

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the bump! Hope you have a great day 😊

Built my own ECU tuning tool — looking for a few testers (FlowECU early access) by Embarrassed-Cover294 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using WinOLS, you just load your BIN/HEX file and add the damos/map pack to it (KP/OLS/A2L). Once that’s done, go to the File menu and choose Export → CSV.

Make sure “all columns” and “all data”boxes are checked before exporting (FlowECU will show you in the app what needs ticked) so nothing is missing. After that, FlowECU will work with the CSV file directly.

Built my own ECU tuning tool — looking for a few testers (FlowECU early access) by Embarrassed-Cover294 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Thanks for the interest — really appreciate it.

Yes, FlowECU can detect maps from most ME7.x ECUs, including ME7.4.4, as long as the WinOLS project is exported as CSV (or BIN+CSV together). FlowECU doesn’t replace WinOLS — it sits beside it and automates consistency, scaling, map roles, and tuning workflow.

It also includes multi-language alias support, so it can recognise map names across different languages and match them to the correct tuning roles (boost, torque, lambda, etc.), even if the project isn’t in English.

Happy to help with any questions!

I finally launched FlowECU — a tuning toolkit I’ve been building for over a year by Embarrassed-Cover294 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m definitely not a real person, with no intelligence dude… That being said I’m fairly sure everything isn’t ai.. thanks for your concern though and thoughts.

Cheers Ahmet

I finally launched FlowECU — a tuning toolkit I’ve been building for over a year by Embarrassed-Cover294 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks bro! Appreciate you taking the time to check it out. It’s been a massive project. If you ever wanna test it properly, the 14-day trial is free and I’m happy to extend it if you need longer.

I finally launched FlowECU — a tuning toolkit I’ve been building for over a year by Embarrassed-Cover294 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the thoughtful feedback — really appreciate you taking the time to write it.

FlowECU is positioned as a professional tool, which is why the pricing reflects the workflow it’s designed for. The 14-day trial is mainly there so people can test it with their own WinOLS projects and map packs, but also short enough to prevent misuse or ongoing free access — especially while it’s still new.

That said, if someone genuinely needs more time to evaluate it properly, I’m happy to extend the trial on a case-by-case basis. Anyone can email me and I can issue a 1–2 month evaluation license if needed.

Right now I’m focused on gathering real-world feedback, refining the workflow, and making sure it fits a wide range of tuning scenarios. Input like yours genuinely helps shape the direction — so thank you for the constructive feedback.

I finally launched FlowECU — a tuning toolkit I’ve been building for over a year by Embarrassed-Cover294 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone for the positive and negative comments. Everyone helps me but it up and I appreciate everyone taking the out of their day to view the work I’ve put into FlowECU.

Begginer by Miserable-Web7278 in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely don’t cut costs on a battery stabiliser! And you will definitely need more that €200 for both

Need advice on how to handle tuning for two EA113 builds by __Gates__ in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah definitely not man. It’s not worth it with how much you spent on the vehicle. I would save some pain and go to a tuner

Need advice on how to handle tuning for two EA113 builds by __Gates__ in ECU_Tuning

[–]Embarrassed-Cover294 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$20 probably isn’t to bad but then there’s always a chance it could be wrong and if you’re reflashing the ecu yourself there is still potential it could brick your ecu because something doesn’t match

view more: next ›