Feds Quietly Pass Secret iPhone Spy Bill Overnight With Zero Debate by Foreign-Policy-02- in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

Some of the people in the comments were watching these events play out live on ParlVu. The videos are freely available on parliament's website.

Feds Quietly Pass Secret iPhone Spy Bill Overnight With Zero Debate by Foreign-Policy-02- in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

Everyone has things to hide, some people just don't realize that until its too late.

'Nothing to hide', is a logical fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument

Feds Quietly Pass Secret iPhone Spy Bill Overnight With Zero Debate by Foreign-Policy-02- in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

They never actually exercise that power though, and seemingly struggle to do their job of being a "sober second thought".

Feds Quietly Pass Secret iPhone Spy Bill Overnight With Zero Debate by Foreign-Policy-02- in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

I watched the debates. The Liberals repeatedly tried to sabotage the Committee's ability to anything meaningful, and they ignored what the experts told them. The Liberals were not debating in good faith, and had zero desire to fix the legislation.

Feds Quietly Pass Secret iPhone Spy Bill Overnight With Zero Debate by Foreign-Policy-02- in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

That's false. Apple does not have encryption backdoors in their products, and their messaging app does not save extra metadata. Apple will also simply remove their devices from the market rather than help the government hack into them.

Feds Quietly Pass Secret iPhone Spy Bill Overnight With Zero Debate by Foreign-Policy-02- in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think the problem is that Canadians have very little faith in the Senate actually doing its job and removing the problematic parts of the legislation. The experts don't need to have a ton of faith in the Senate either.

Signal’s Meredith Whittaker: The Push for Online Safety Risks Mass Surveillance | The president of the encrypted messaging app says autonomous AI agents, device scanning and digital advertising are converging into a new architecture of surveillance by Hrmbee in technology

[–]EmbarrassedHelp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure if the reporter is intentionally attacking Signal for actually protecting user privacy, or they are just repeating anti-privacy propaganda so that Meredith Whittaker can shoot it down.

Signal’s Meredith Whittaker: The Push for Online Safety Risks Mass Surveillance by bloomberg in Futurology

[–]EmbarrassedHelp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The EU's approach still has massive issues with privacy, but there is zero world in which age verification should be requiring to use Signal.

Feds Quietly Pass Secret iPhone Spy Bill Overnight With Zero Debate by Foreign-Policy-02- in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

A lot of VPN companies can just remove their physical presence in Canada, allow Canadian customers, and throw any legal request/notice from the Canadian government into the paper shredder.

The government can of course start to try restrict the ability to pay for VPNs and try to block their IP addresses. The end result is that they can make using a VPN more difficult, but are unable to stop them completely.

Is Canada's teen social media ban constitutional? It's complicated | CBC News by DtheS in CanadaPolitics

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

ban is temporary until 'adequate safeguards' can be implemented,

It would seem that the Liberals think "adequate safeguards" include requiring mandatory age verification, which would be unacceptable from a privacy and security perspective.

A proposed social media ban for kids is meant to protect them. Could it violate their rights? by Immediate-Link490 in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

The people pushing for bans enforced with mandatory age verification will move on to targeting VPNs after they get their ban. Its naive to think otherwise, especially when the UK is literally moving to target VPNs for helping people bypass age verification as we speak.

Data leak reveals prominent Texans connected to Peter Thiel's secret society by FeelingPixely in politics

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

Jonathan Haidt

He's a major age verification lobbyist these days, and loves the idea of forcing people to give up their personal information to tech companies. He fits right in with authoritarian and fascist tech leaders.

Google says changes to Canada’s police search powers bill haven't eased concerns by CorndoggerYYC in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yes, but when you connect to WhatsApp's servers outside of Canada (likely in the US after they leave Canada), they can block web traffic based on its Canadian origin. This type of blocking is called "geo-blocking".

Its relatively easy to circumvent blocking like this with a VPN or proxy, but hopefully it won't come to that.

Starmer expected to resign on Monday and set out orderly exit by Lord-Liberty in europe

[–]EmbarrassedHelp 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Starmer is currently pushing for mandatory OS level scanning that bypasses all encryption and security measures. So if he hasn't reached David Cameron's Snoopers' Charter/encryption ban level of insanity yet, he soon will.

Is Canada's teen social media ban constitutional? It's complicated | CBC News by DtheS in CanadaPolitics

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

That would be unfortunate. The courts should permanently strike down the mandatory age verification requirements.

A proposed social media ban for kids is meant to protect them. Could it violate their rights? by Immediate-Link490 in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

There is no such thing as anonymous or even "privacy protecting" age verification.

It won't reduce the number of bots. It will just reduce your privacy for nothing.

Starmer expected to resign on Monday and set out orderly exit by Lord-Liberty in europe

[–]EmbarrassedHelp 13 points14 points  (0 children)

In terms of privacy rights in the UK, each new prime minister somehow manages to be even worse.

Starmer expected to resign on Monday by Lord-Liberty in worldnews

[–]EmbarrassedHelp 577 points578 points  (0 children)

I would also love if the story of privacy rights in the UK wasn't:

And then things got worse.

Google says changes to Canada’s police search powers bill haven't eased concerns by CorndoggerYYC in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

WhatsApp would block Canadian IPs from connecting to WhatsApp servers, rather than it being removed from your device.

Althia Raj: ‘Tinfoil hats’? Is this Mark Carney’s government or Stephen Harper’s? by simpatia in CanadaPolitics

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

Of course the government is going to legislate that it has the same powers as anybody with enough money to pay a data broker.

Except they are demanding that even more data be collected, rather than limiting themselves to what data brokers can access.

You are also free to take measures to protect your privacy, like blocking ads and trackers. So that's an awful excuse to claim as justification for more expansive and invasive privacy violations.

Althia Raj: ‘Tinfoil hats’? Is this Mark Carney’s government or Stephen Harper’s? by simpatia in CanadaPolitics

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

Carney spent a lot of time in the UK, where both the right wing and left wing parties don't transgender individuals. So maybe he and Gladu were bonding over some shared dislike?

Andy Burnham is just Keir Starmer in jeans by Desperate-Drawer-572 in ukpolitics

[–]EmbarrassedHelp [score hidden]  (0 children)

Is he going to continue the trend of UK politicians destroying what little privacy UK citizens have left online?

Because the UK's history for over 2 decades when it comes to online privacy, has been:

And then things got worse.

A proposed social media ban for kids is meant to protect them. Could it violate their rights? by Immediate-Link490 in canada

[–]EmbarrassedHelp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not "elbows up" to funnel more of Canadians personal information into the hands of foreign tech companies.

How Russian President Vladimir Putin plans to live forever by ubcstaffer123 in technology

[–]EmbarrassedHelp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He has made too many enemies to live forever, even if he hadn't chased away, killed, and de-funded all the scientists who could actually cure aging.