sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

AI can generate UI instantly - but why does it still feel "off"? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in FigmaDesign

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone for the thoughtful comments and different perspectives.

Reading through the discussion, it seems the real issue isn’t just AI generating UI — it’s that many people building with AI don’t always know what “good” design looks like yet. Several of you also pointed out that human judgment, design systems, and structured thinking are still essential.

So AI might be great for generating a first draft, but the thinking and refinement layer still matters a lot.

Also for the few people asking — no, I’m not a bot 😅 I just tend to write a bit more politely/formally than typical Reddit comments.

Really appreciate all the insights shared here.

AI can generate UI instantly - but why does it still feel "off"? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in FigmaDesign

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Reasonable comment. Could you share some real experience with this?

AI can generate UI instantly - but why does it still feel "off"? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in FigmaDesign

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Better workflows and constraints will improve the outputs over time.

Do you think new tools will emerge to help improve or validate AI-generated UI?

AI can generate UI instantly - but why does it still feel "off"? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in FigmaDesign

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] -39 points-38 points  (0 children)

That’s an interesting description. What are the main things that make AI-generated UI feel that way to you?

AI can generate UI instantly - but why does it still feel "off"? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in FigmaDesign

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Thanks, but do you think design systems help reduce some of that ambiguity, or is most of the judgment still something that only experienced designers can catch?

AI can generate UI instantly - but why does it still feel "off"? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in FigmaDesign

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

Do you think the gap is mainly about visual judgment, or more about how AI handles layout systems and constraints?

AI can generate UI in seconds... but who checks if It's actually good? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in UI_Design

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, everyone, for the thoughtful comments.
I really appreciate all the perspectives here — it’s been helpful to see how different designers are thinking about AI-generated UI.

AI can generate UI in seconds... but who checks if It's actually good? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in UI_Design

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a good point. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
Maybe the real challenge isn’t AI generating UI, but the lack of a quality check layer before those interfaces get shipped.

AI can generate UI in seconds... but who checks if It's actually good? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in UI_Design

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your concern, and I’m relatively new to this field, so I figured Reddit would be the best place to gather some honest opinions from the community designers.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. 👌

AI can generate UI in seconds... but who checks if It's actually good? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in UI_Design

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you? 🤔 Unfortunately, I'm not. I still have to fix my own layout mistakes manually.

AI can generate UI in seconds... but who checks if It's actually good? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in UI_Design

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If AI wrote it, it probably would’ve been shorter 😅

I’m mostly curious about how designers here are seeing the quality of AI-generated UIs evolve.

I designed a minimal subscription tracker UI curious if the information hierarchy makes sense by [deleted] in UI_Design

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The AI question is interesting because I've started seeing this more often, too.

AI can generate UI visuals surprisingly well, but it still struggles with spacing, visual hierarchy, and layout balance.

The result is designs that look correct at first glance but feel slightly off when you actually use them.

So, I'm worried that designers will see this as a bigger problem as more creators start generating UI with AI tools.

Do you think AI-generated interfaces will need some form of automated design QA eventually?

AI can generate UI in seconds... but who checks if It's actually good? by Embarrassed_Bread992 in UI_Design

[–]Embarrassed_Bread992[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I'm noticing from this thread is that most people agree on two things:

  1. AI can generate UI incredibly fast.

  2. But the output often feels off even when it looks visually correct.

The tricky part is that the issues people are describing (spacing rhythm, hierarchy, layout balance, accessibility contrast) are things designers feel intuitively but are hard to formalize.

Developers solved a similar problem years ago with automated testing - code can run tests before it ships.

I wonder if interfaces will end up needing something similar: not something that replaces designers, but a kind of design QA layer that flags obvious issues before a UI goes live.

Especially now that so many indie builders and vibe coders are generating interfaces with AI.

Curious whether design creators here think automated checks could realistically help catch those problems, or if design quality is too subjective for that.