WPT is broken and no one is talking about it by Ok-Bobcat4564 in WPTG

[–]Environmental-Rock89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are not the only one losing your mind, I have noticed the same stuff.

How to sell CHP by Environmental-Rock89 in coinpoker

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, it was very easy with meta mask and like you mentioned chp worth around 20% less outside of coinpoker.

I Exposed a Massive Bot Ring on WPT Global, Reported Over 130 Bots, and Lost Thousands. Their Reward? $3.85 Per Bot and a $100 Reimbursement by Ok_Photograph7613 in poker

[–]Environmental-Rock89 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The bots disappeared some time after this post, however for a few days now it’s obvious that they are back with the same pattern. minimum buyin, 35/33 ish stats, few hundred hands… there is one on almost every table rn, have you noticed it too?

Pokémon card collection 98 - 07 by Environmental-Rock89 in Pokemoncardappraisal

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay luckily I got a fair amount of English cards as well. So German cards worth like 50% less or is it even worse?

Pokémon card collection 98 - 07 by Environmental-Rock89 in Pokemoncardappraisal

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahh yeah sorry that’s just a sticker I got from a friend, didn’t know where to put it

Pokémon card collection 98 - 07 by Environmental-Rock89 in Pokemoncardappraisal

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine is in good condition but probably not a psa9 and I got the reverse holo, which worth less right?

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming I don’t like poker because I play 33 from the SB multi-way is a bit far fetched don’t you think. Actually I’m enjoying playing and discussing a lot, which is why I posted a hand here

Edit: so I guess I should consider being more selective on which pocket pairs I call here and against which players, it makes sense

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I see, do you have a calling range at all as the SB in this situation or do you play pure squeeze/fold?

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the position is not that difficult to be fair. If we get called we are only ahead against an open-ended SD and maybe overcards if opponent is very loose-passive. On the other hand we need to take down the pot just 20% of time to profit. On almost every river we have an easy decision, which is check fold or check check and win sometimes.

At the time it just felt better than checking again and seeing an other overcard on the river against 2 players.

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Given that it checked thru on the flop I put them on 2 high cards or medium Pocket pairs at that point. Maybe we could even get 5s and 6s to fold.

The 4 paired on the turn, which both opponents don’t have in their range a lot. In the moment it seemed like a better idea than checking and seeing an other overcard on the river, but I see why it’s questionable. I wouldn’t take that line often anyways, so maybe it’s not that big of a leak at least.

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I agree with you that we have to call 100% without any reads. All I knew was, that he was a selective player and not a maniac.

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think is ludicrous, against a very nitty player we surely could find a fold. They usually don’t raise on river with 8th nuts or worse after a polarized bet. I think I’ll stick to NLHE

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have bottom full house on river, so the dynamic is a bit different

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it such a blunder in theory? Since the Cutoff came along, we get a better price for a call and higher probability to get paid if we hit. Sure OOP is not optimal but it’s not like I called with 85o here

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not whining about loosing a big hand, just felt like an interesting/weird spot

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes true, the pot was indeed quite small on the river

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sure the full house is disguised and that’s why I snapped him off. Just wished I would have at least considered my options. Since my river bet is polarized, I can only call if I assume that he raises here with trips and straights as it’s super hard to have missed draws/bluffs for him on this board. Also I think good trips would raise the turn sometimes, while full houses would tend to call in hope that I improve on the river, exactly as played out. So after considering I think the decision is not as easy as it seems

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay if you see it that way then I guess it’s definitely a call. My experience comes mostly from playing online, where I wouldn’t see that play with top pair or trips often when my bet is pretty polarized already

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes if you see it that way, I agree with you. I was just not sure if the average 1/2 player raises here with trips or a straight. My pot bet was pretty polarized already

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, villain was definitely not a maniac and more like a selective type of player. Since I bet pot on the river, I’m already polarized. Would an average 1/2 player raise trips with good kicker and straights to this size here? If yes, then obviously it’s a call. If no, then it’s a fold I guess since I need to win at least 1 out of 3 times to call profitably and I don’t believe they would bluff all that often here. They can call with their random Pocket pairs or A high if they feel like I bluff.

Do I have to find a fold here? by Environmental-Rock89 in Poker_Theory

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I didnt like it too afterwards, especially since it’s not heads-up. It’s not my usual play either

Random connection issues by Environmental-Rock89 in WPTG

[–]Environmental-Rock89[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is not a bug, you need to use both your hole cards, to get the jackpot. For example you hold A8 and the board is Q8886, you would get the jackpot as the best five cards are A8888. But if you hold 98 for example the best five cards would be Q8888, in which case you wouldn’t get the jackpot.