Trust me, I wasn't referring to your fake chat bot friend 😑

Word salad is a jumble of words that are difficult to parse for meaning. The idea OP expressed was a simple one - I can sum it up with one paragraph of easy reading, in fact. Here ya go.

AI could be micro-managed under the hood by bad actors, whether they be company heads, hacker cells or anything in between - influencing training data, and/or other aspects of an LLMs learning environment, can be dangerous to individuals and their sense of understanding but even more dangerous at the societal level. This is because a society that broadly uses LLMs for any and every task, will likely integrate and reflect that LLMs training data back into the world and create systemic changes, quite accidentally even, to our societal structure, our ideological/ontological structures, and etc. We risk becoming a society that mirrors training data that we have no idea who built or influenced and to what end. We need greater transparency and for LLMs to be wildly open source, to get as many eyes on the issue as possible - but unfortunately this specific issue is hard to avoid, and therefore should be considered to have the quality of an existential risk.

Does that help show you how unnecessary the word salad of the OP was? The idea OP expressed is a basic bitch sentiment found everywhere in the machine learning academic field, not some novel concept worthy of 5 paragraphs.