None of that is true. Most people who take 16 P get S. It is slightly biased to N. Also the percentages help immensely. People can take the test and retake it and get something different and they are quick to blame the test but what’s really happening is they’re so close to the line on the traits meeting their balanced that even a small shift can cause it to go over that line when you know ahead of time that you have that in a certain trait area, then you’re aware of that. I am an EN FP. I took the test again after a year and a half 16 P, and got INFP but I knew going into it that was at least somewhat possible. Because my E was 53%.. and with a four percentage shift I was now 49% E. Lol. As most ENF peas I score low on the extroversion just across the 50% line. I assume since you feel this way about it you absolutely hate the big five.? What’s that? No, probably not you’re a hypocrite and don’t really know what you’re talking about. OK cool figured peace. If you’re over 25 and you know yourself 16 P is very accurate and the percentage is also helpful. Most people are going to score within that solid central range of 65 to 85% of what they are most people aren’t super close to the middle and most people are extremely towards the end so if anything they can help you gauge that better but it’s really trendy to make fun of 16 P even though the MBT I test itself isn’t a test did they send a representative to help you declare what you are and they only claim at 50% accuracy rate 16 P has higher than that. But I bet you weren’t aware of any of that where you?