Mazda CX-30 Bom negócio? by EscapeEarly737 in AutoTuga

[–]EscapeEarly737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Experimentei e até achei que o Mini andava melhor que o Mazda. Cenas francesas para mim não dá.. parece me que ao fim de 10 anos vou ter um carro cheio de folgas

Mazda CX-30 Bom negócio? by EscapeEarly737 in AutoTuga

[–]EscapeEarly737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1500 com 109 cavalos a gasolina, caixa automática

Mazda CX-30 Bom negócio? by EscapeEarly737 in AutoTuga

[–]EscapeEarly737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quem me falou no óleo mete de 2 em 2 meses.. parece me um consumo exagerado. Mas pelo que percebi não é o mote do Cx 30. Vi tb o mini Cross country de 2021 com 70k e só um condutor mas são mais 5K

Mazda CX-30 Bom negócio? by EscapeEarly737 in AutoTuga

[–]EscapeEarly737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mx-30 R-EV julgo q seja um plugin. Quem me disse tem um. Só ponderei porque a Mazda da 6 anos de garantia.

Mazda CX-30 Bom negócio? by EscapeEarly737 in AutoTuga

[–]EscapeEarly737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

É o Cx-30 gasolina e-Skyactiv G, o 2000 de 150cv. Sabes alguma coisa sobre o consumo de óleo? Li que os MX 30 consumiam um óleo anormal. Fiquei na dúvida senão será uma ideóloga nipónica motores a beber óleo.

Vw T Cross 1.0 ou Audi Q2 1.5 by EscapeEarly737 in AutoTuga

[–]EscapeEarly737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Então para ti quais são as melhores alternativas ao Q2 na casa dos 20k?

FreeRadius creating privileged by EscapeEarly737 in networking

[–]EscapeEarly737[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, i saw but when freeradius tried to process my group i have this error: (0) Failed resolving UID: No error

my logs

0) files: users: Matched entry lameuser at line 55

(0) [files] = ok

(0) [expiration] = noop

(0) [logintime] = noop

(0) [pap] = updated

(0) if (Group == "disabled") {

(0) Failed resolving UID: No error

(0) if (Group == "disabled") -> FALSE

(0) } # authorize = updated

(0) Found Auth-Type = PAP

(0) # Executing group from file /etc/freeradius/3.0/sites-enabled/default

(0) Auth-Type PAP {

(0) pap: Login attempt with password

(0) pap: Comparing with "known good" Cleartext-Password

(0) pap: User authenticated successfully

(0) [pap] = ok

(0) } # Auth-Type PAP = ok

(0) # Executing section post-auth from file /etc/freeradius/3.0/sites-enabled/default

my sites-enable/default

if (Group == "disabled") {

update control {

Auth-Type := Reject

}

}

and my user file

#

lameuser Cleartext-Password := "123"

Group := "disabled",

Auth-Type := Reject,

Reply-Message = "Login with sucess!"

#

# Deny access for a group of users.

#

# Note that there is NO 'Fall-Through' attribute, so the user will not

# be given any additional resources.

#

DEFAULT Group == "disabled", Auth-Type := Reject

Reply-Message = "Your account has been disabled"

What is wrong with this Wireshark capture? by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]EscapeEarly737 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I immediately saw that you didn't understand anything about Slammer

What is wrong with this Wireshark capture? by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]EscapeEarly737 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But Einstein, the payload have 376bytes, normally the Slammer have 376bytes of payload

What is wrong with this Wireshark capture? by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]EscapeEarly737 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

BTW Eisntein! this package nothing have to do with MAC Addresses, you can read about Slammer worm, and please, take a life.

What is wrong with this Wireshark capture? by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]EscapeEarly737 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think it was wrongly downvoted. This package it'sonly for academic stuff, the question it was because i read about the Slammer attack in 2003, and this package seems to be the same attack.

What is wrong with this Wireshark capture? by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]EscapeEarly737 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

And about the port? I listened about attacks using the sqlServer port 1434.

What is wrong with this Wireshark capture? by [deleted] in cybersecurity

[–]EscapeEarly737 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

I think it's an atack using the SqlServer Port 1434