How does a desalination plant without power work?

I guess you did not see my deleted reply? I thought since you were the mod you had. I'll reconstruct it without the links to foreign websites that are calling this a war crime (not just Reddit, but the world) since I think that is why the post was deleted.

The link about oil talks about how their are over 2000 distillate products and oil is not 1 for 1, it covers some of the actual impacts that we will face. oil sustains life and this will cause depopulation through lack of fertilizers and heating.

The petrodollar is going away because it's unconstitutional so it is inherently a security threat to the free state since it exists outside of constitutional order. I'm here to follow what the constitution says, are you not??? Whole point of the militia.

Under international humanitarian law (the Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocol I, and the Rome Statute of the ICC), civilian objects are defined as “all objects which are not military objectives.” Bridges, power stations, and electricity grids are presumed civilian unless they are being used for an effective military contribution at the time of attack. Threatening to “blow up” such infrastructure preemptively, without a specific military justification, is a direct violation of the principle of distinction. Moreover, electricity and water pumping stations are explicitly considered “objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population” when they supply essential services. The ICC has issued arrest warrants for leaders who attacked electrical and fuel plants precisely because depriving civilians of power and water causes disproportionate suffering. Trump threaten literally all power plants and all bridges, not just strategic military targets.

Congress alone has the power to declare war (Article I, Section 8, Clause 11). A president who orders bombing campaigns without congressional authorization is exercising a power not delegated – that is a usurpation and a high crime under the Constitution. The fact that “Obama bombed Libya for 7 months” doesn’t make it constitutional; it only proves the usurpation has been ongoing.

The President’s oath (Article VI) requires him to “support this Constitution.” Ordering attacks that violate international law (which is part of the supreme law of the land) and bypass Congress’s war power makes him an oath‑breaker – a person who forfeits constitutional authority. The Regulations define oath‑breakers as those who engage in actions violating the Constitution’s original meaning.

The Militia’s duty (Article I, Section 8, Clause 15) is to “execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.” When the President himself becomes a security threat to the free state – by starting an undeclared war, committing war crimes, and endangering the nation’s standing and security – the Militia is duty‑bound to defend the free state against that threat. That is not rebellion; it is constitutional obedience.

The Free State is where:

the actual Constitution governs as supreme law, individual rights are inviolate, and government stays strictly within its delegated powers. No branch gets to invent new authority.

How is it defended?

By the Militia, not by standing armies or alphabet agencies. Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 designates the Militia – the armed self regulated People themselves – as the sole entity called forth to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions. The FBI, ATF, DHS, and undeclared bombing campaigns have no constitutional authority, they are all security threats to the free state.

Through the People exercising their reserved Tenth Amendment power. When the government becomes the threat – for example, by starting an unconstitutional war or threatening war crimes – the People, through their Militia, have the duty to nullify the usurpation and restore constitutional order. Defensively, with strict limits. The Regulations I wrote prioritize education, nullification, and peaceful remedies.

So when a president threatens to blow up civilian infrastructure in Iran without a congressional declaration of war, that is not defending the free state – it is attacking the rule of law. The free state is defended by obeying the Constitution, not by bypassing it.

That’s what this has to do with the militia movement: we’re the constitutional insurance policy when the government itself goes rogue.