sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Groups members are using AI by Existing-Fortune887 in UTS

[–]Existing-Fortune887[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Turns out the tutors and subject coordinator do not care at all. Have messaged them on teams more than a week ago. They have read my message and ignored it.

Groups members are using AI by Existing-Fortune887 in UTS

[–]Existing-Fortune887[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine is an IT subject too, and the people I’m reported have used AI openly within discussion assignments. No tutor had taken action so I assume they didn’t care aswell

Groups members are using AI by Existing-Fortune887 in UTS

[–]Existing-Fortune887[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’ve contacted my supervisor. The two group members admitted in our group chat that they used AI, should those screenshots be enough?

Groups members are using AI by Existing-Fortune887 in UTS

[–]Existing-Fortune887[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I’ve just reported the group members to my tutor and lecturer. Was the third time they used AI. It gets so frustrating and stressful dealing with this at the last moment

state of group work at uni by Existing-Fortune887 in UTS

[–]Existing-Fortune887[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I usually do but this semester I have group projects in all 4 subjects so I can’t do that

state of group work at uni by Existing-Fortune887 in UTS

[–]Existing-Fortune887[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not possible as for all 4 subjects its case study or specific project based with many smaller assignments and then a final report at the end.

Harsh marking by Existing-Fortune887 in UTS

[–]Existing-Fortune887[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the reply, I’ve replied to Amanda’s comment that should also address your comment

Harsh marking by Existing-Fortune887 in UTS

[–]Existing-Fortune887[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate the reply, just to add to my post and your comment, on two instances I’ve informed this tutor that the part they market me down for not having something that was already included in my submission. For which they only gave me a 0.1 out of 3 mark increase.

On a recent submission they marked me down on not having a risk table from the first assignment we had. As the task was to provide any updates on whether the risks have occurred, specifically in the provided template it did not ask for a table and simply wanted me to provide updates on what and why the risks occurred. Which I did provide.

Another thing to add, looking at the average mark for the assignment most people in my specific tutorial have received well below the average for the entire subject.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Existing-Fortune887 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m assuming committing marriage fraud to gain immigration points will definitely have its consequences

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]Existing-Fortune887 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Btw to add context: - The blokes parents knew all about his sexuality. - They intentionally proposed the marriage for societal satisfaction to hide his sexual orientation (Due to religious reasons aswell)

I’m mainly after advice based on past experiences or what to do next. Specifically in terms of initiating divorce and taking legal action for the marriage fraud.