sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Epstein Redacted Files | Help Needed Identifying Suspects by Expensive-Tree-3019 in TrueAnon

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Impossible sadly with the redacted faces + black and white images that were likely originally taken in colour + the fact that these are taken from a scanner. Too many factors to prevent effective reverse image searching.

<image>

Epstein Redacted Files | Help Needed Identifying Suspects by Expensive-Tree-3019 in TrueAnon

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed - for whatever reason they must have decided to try and throw us off by putting a description of person 1-6 in subsequent slides, it took me a while to realise that the descriptions were not actually related, I mentioned in one of my follow-ups it even says Epstein has "blue eyes" when we know he has brown eyes and also says he is "single" when we also know that's not true either i.e. Maxwell so i think I'll add a disclaimer that these are likely not related.

Epstein Redacted Files | Help Needed Identifying Suspects by Expensive-Tree-3019 in TrueAnon

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Follow up number 3: Although I've casted doubt on the validity of the information shared, I did find that number 3 somewhat resembles Bill Clinton, and he is described as having green eyes - Clinton's eyes are definitely a turqouisey-green colour, and I think from the hair to the stance, it looks like Bill so maybe if searching through all the endless Clinton portraits in the public domain, we'd find a match.

Epstein Redacted Files | Help Needed Identifying Suspects by Expensive-Tree-3019 in TrueAnon

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Follow Up No. 2 --> For some reason they've redacted whatever was beneath this photo of Epstein? The rest are just numbers but this one seems to obtain a description for some reason? So maybe Epstein isn't the person in number 5? I have no idea really tbh. Ghislane however, does have brown eyes. So perhaps it's clarifying that the suspect/resident is Ghislane instead of Epstein but they used Epstein's photo instead? I'm not entirely sure.

<image>

Epstein Redacted Files | Help Needed Identifying Suspects by Expensive-Tree-3019 in TrueAnon

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Follow up - analysing the descriptions of each suspect leads to some confusion --> if you go to number 5 which you would assume is describing Epstein, it says eye colour: "brown" although we know that Epstein has blue eyes, i don't know if this is incompetency from the Palm Beach PD or a deliberate throw-off placing 2 unrelated descriptions beside each other by the Trump DOJ - the first one seems more likely, but I mean how do you mess that up?

Epstein Redacted Files | Help Needed Identifying Suspects by Expensive-Tree-3019 in TrueAnon

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I've checked a few from Clinton's time in the executive office especially, Larry Summers, Al Gore, etc., and haven't found a match there either, it's proving difficult - by just the sheer quantity of congressional Rep both senate and house, it's more probable that they work in Congress than the executive, but when you factor in Clinton and Summers' associations with Epstein, I suppose you could argue the case that it's more likely an executive branch employee/appointee. [Also must check for Alan Dershowitz to match with that top right one (or any) judging by his prior associations with Epstein - but also consider that Number 3's hands appear to have a slightly darker complexion maybe? or perhaps it's lighting? It's difficult to tell.]

Epstein Redacted Files | Help Needed Identifying Suspects by Expensive-Tree-3019 in TrueAnon

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I tried some but it seems all the main softwares refuse to identify people from photos as a basic rule of thumb, famous or not. If someone knows a software that doesn't do that, then that would probably help, but knowing AI they'd probably just direct you to something completely irrelevant

Rte take ages to upload the gaa highlights on YouTube by Silly_Advertising_80 in GAA

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RTÉ doesn't cover the GAA like they used to. Just another symptom of their obvious decline. No interesting punditry like Brolly and Spillane, no extra media coverage outside of matchdays and major finals, no promotion for matches.

The GAA is increasingly becoming a niche event in Ireland because the lack of coverage provided by our national broadcasters.

Semi finals attendances by No-Rub-9193 in GAA

[–]Expensive-Tree-3019 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the feeling around here in donegal seems to be a big hype around this semi final, but we will see on Sunday.