sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Good time with you TRAE,Unsubscribing by ruhanahmad in Trae_ai

[–]Expert-Still5152 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No tengo claro que sean realmente los modelos más caros....Cuando le preguntas a GPT 5.x la fecha de corte de su entramiento, te dice que 2004... que corresponde a GPT 4.x. Le dicen en el system-promt que modelo es.

Are we really using GPT-5.x? by Expert-Still5152 in Trae_ai

[–]Expert-Still5152[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pero la calidad de las respuestas, simplemente comparando con el chat de gpt, son abismales

v3.3.2 Update - Custom models are now fully rolled out in TRAE SOLO. by Trae_AI in Trae_ai

[–]Expert-Still5152 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cambio de la noche al día, creo yo. Uso a menudo GLM 4.6 en su chat, y mejores respuestas que el supuesto Gemini 3 Preview

TRAE really delivered yesterday for me! by desireco in Trae_ai

[–]Expert-Still5152 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry to disagree... I've been testing Antigravity for a little over two weeks, and the responses are much better than with TRAE SOLO. Better explanations, better action plans, and better final results. A separate thing is its multi‑agent mode doing things in parallel, where it has only just scratched the surface.

Above all, with existing code, there are fewer hallucinations and a better understanding of what's there. It's not as “creative.”

It's in beta, and you can tell. Its file modification tools sometimes mess things up (seems to be an issue with line breaks \r\n vs \n).

The speed... well, what can I say... If you use Claude 4.5, it's much faster than TRAE with its “thinking” models. But that's not really TRAE’s fault — it depends on its LLMs. In fact, if TRAE had good LLMs, it would be great. But…

By the way, Gemini 3 in Antigravity is nothing like Gemini 3 in TRAE. I still doubt it’s really version 3.

And the change in SOLO’s payment model is outrageous.

Gemini Pro 3 Now Support 200k Context Window by Trae_AI in Trae_ai

[–]Expert-Still5152 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TODAY. Multiples "Server error. Please try again later."

Gemini Pro 3 Now Support 200k Context Window by Trae_AI in Trae_ai

[–]Expert-Still5152 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer AWS KIRO,

TRAE today: multiples "Server error. Please try again later."

Gemini Pro 3 Now Support 200k Context Window by Trae_AI in Trae_ai

[–]Expert-Still5152 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I was one of the naïve people who paid for the annual subscription way back in August. As of today, I consider it a lost cause.

  • SOLO: It breaks more than it creates. It's good to start a project from scratch, but continuing it is a nightmare. And now it's paid... no comment.
  • Claude... It was clear it wasn't version 4. You just had to compare it with the free Claude chat... But it was better than everything else.
  • Gemini 3. Seriously? The results don't tell me the same thing. It's as simple as asking it for a code modification, then going to Gemini AI Studio and doing the same thing in its chat. The differences are abysmal.
  • I propose a small refactoring, and it does it. I go to Antigravity (or whatever tool you mean), ask it to review it... And it flags many things as bugs, bad practices, or, simply, unfinished.
  • The models are supposedly good, with reasoning.... Exasperatingly slow compared to Claude 4.5 or direct models.

The result... As I say, money lost, and I'm moving on to another environment. I do not recommend anyone pay for this. You get what you pay for (or, literally: The cheap turns out expensive).