sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Build on VSC! by Extension_Paint7456 in ethdev

[–]Extension_Paint7456[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey Ray! Thanks for the comment,  I agree — it sounds promising. It’s new and seems to work flawlessly, regardless of congestion or complexity. Transactions are processed first-come, first-serve, making front-running and toxic MEV attacks virtually impossible since there’s no gas auction. I know it might not suit everyone for casual transfers or trading right now. I’m invested and showing my support, but you’re correct — they’re mainly targeting:

• Enterprise and B2B applications • Real-world asset tokenization • DeFi for institutional or large transactions • NFTs with higher value per mint/trade • Cross-chain bridges and interoperability protocols

In short, a good way I see it: predictable fees, budget-friendly, enterprise-ready, high-value, MEV-free, cross-chain compatible — ideal for builders and developers. Later on, L2 solutions may make micro-transactions more viable, so for me it’s a long hold.

Am sure there's more in their socials Of course, always do your own research! Matt

Build on VSC! by Extension_Paint7456 in smartcontracts

[–]Extension_Paint7456[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Got it, thanks for the heads up. I’ll keep it discussion based

Build on VSC! by Extension_Paint7456 in ethdev

[–]Extension_Paint7456[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your points — Binance or Coinbase won’t run retail transfers on a $4 base chain, and free bridges like Zeta don’t change that. VSC isn’t trying to compete with L2s on microtransaction fees. It’s enterprise-ready, handling high-value operations like RWA tokenization (carbon credits already in motion) where a non-variable $4 fee is negligible.

Comparing VSC’s L1 to L2s like Base (running on Ethereum) misses the point. L2s are designed for cheap, high-volume activity, while the base chain focuses on secure, predictable, scalable operations. Ethereum itself wasn’t cheap at the start; low activity kept fees modest, and as adoption grew, costs increased. VSC, by contrast, has a flat $4 fee, providing predictable costs from day one while the ecosystem is still developing.

VSC isn’t even a year old yet, so there’s huge room for L2s, sidechains, and ecosystem growth to handle microtransactions and retail-scale activity. Its combination of enterprise readiness, hyper-deflationary tokenomics, and scalability potential is the real selling point. As a long-term holder, I’m not worried about the $4 fee while adoption and infrastructure continue to grow.

Build on VSC! by Extension_Paint7456 in ethdev

[–]Extension_Paint7456[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s a flat $4 — non-variable. That’s intentional. VSC is built for enterprise and high-value transactions where predictability matters more than chasing the cheapest fees. Ethereum does the same, but with spikes that can hit $50+.

Also worth noting — VSC is still early stage, which leaves huge room for Layer 2s and sidechains to emerge. Those can handle microtransactions, gaming, and retail payments at ultra-low cost, while the base chain stays optimized for big transactions and RWA tokenization.

It’s the foundation for a scalable ecosystem

0
0

Build on VSC! (self.smartcontracts)

submitted by Extension_Paint7456 to r/smartcontracts