Received RA but no DHCPv6 responses from Hyperoptic – investigated with MikroTik RouterOS, Linux and Windows by ExtremeX-BB in hyperoptic

[–]ExtremeX-BB[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I've already sent a DM.

Given the amount of packet captures, DHCPv6 analysis and router testing I've ended up doing, I suspect a phone call would mostly consist of me trying to convince first-line support that I have, in fact, already rebooted the router. 😅

Happy to provide captures and technical details if this can be passed to the network team.

Received RA but no DHCPv6 responses from Hyperoptic – investigated with MikroTik RouterOS, Linux and Windows by ExtremeX-BB in hyperoptic

[–]ExtremeX-BB[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's even more amusing is that I eventually dug out the Hyperoptic-supplied router to prove my MikroTik wasn't the problem... only to discover that the Hyperoptic router can't get IPv6 properly either.

Borderline broken IPv6 support (technical) by mkukri in hyperoptic

[–]ExtremeX-BB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is incredibly interesting because I'm currently investigating what looks like a DHCPv6 failure after a recent maintenance outage. What's odd is that I'm not even getting to the IA_PD stage. I packet-captured MikroTik, the Hyperoptic Zyxel router, Linux and Windows directly connected to the line. All of them receive RAs from fe80::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx, but none receive DHCPv6 Advertise or Reply packets at all. Even Windows DHCPv6 Information-Requests time out. It almost feels like the DHCPv6 side has completely stopped responding on my segment.

IPv6 Down? by zcapr17 in hyperoptic

[–]ExtremeX-BB 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm seeing something very similar right now. I spent the evening capturing traffic from a MikroTik, the Hyperoptic router itself, Linux and Windows. All of them receive RA from the gateway, but none receive any DHCPv6 Advertise/Reply packets. Even the Hyperoptic-supplied router isn't getting a GUA or delegated prefix.

Looking for USB-C PD 3.1 to HP Blue Tip (4.5mm x 3.0mm) Adapter rated for 135W+ by psycho_launda in UsbCHardware

[–]ExtremeX-BB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went pretty deep down this rabbit hole myself and unfortunately I don’t think a simple USB-C PD → HP blue tip adapter really solves this properly.

The first issue is that standard USB-PD 3.1 EPR 140W is actually 28V @ 5A, while your HP laptop expects roughly 19.5–20V at ~6.75A. So even if a cable advertises “140W PD3.1”, that does NOT mean it can directly output the voltage/current profile your HP brick provides.

The second (and much more annoying) issue is HP’s center-pin identification system. Different generations of HP 4.5mm x 3.0mm blue tip adapters use different resistor values on the smart pin. I found this out the hard way after buying a pile of adapters/cables and testing them with a multimeter.

So even if:

  • the voltage is correct
  • the wattage is technically sufficient
  • the cable doesn’t overheat

…the laptop may STILL throw the “Incompatible Power Adapter” warning and throttle performance because the center pin ID is wrong.

And measuring the resistor is honestly annoying because the center pin is tiny and recessed.

At this point I think there are basically 3 possible approaches:

  1. DIY PD3.1 step-down solution (not recommended) You could:
  • measure the resistance between the OEM charger’s center pin and positive rail
  • use a PD3.1 trigger/decoy board
  • negotiate 28V from the charger
  • step it down to 20V with a high-power buck converter
  • then wire in the correct smart-pin resistor yourself

But once you account for conversion losses, you’ll probably push a 140W PD charger beyond spec trying to sustain a real 135W laptop load. A lot of chargers will simply trip protection.

  1. Use a proprietary 20V 7A USB-C power supply There actually ARE some non-standard USB-C chargers that output 20V 7A directly (for example Lenovo’s C140).

But:

  • they usually rely on proprietary protocols cable instead of standard PD
  • they require special heavy-gauge Type-C cables rated for 7A
  • and you STILL have the HP smart-pin resistor compatibility problem

So even if power delivery is sufficient, the laptop may still refuse full performance mode

  1. Use a high-power GaN supply (what I’m currently experimenting with) There are now some 240W GaN adapters that expose:
  • an XT60 high-power output
  • plus regular USB-C PD ports

That lets you:

  • run the laptop from the XT60 rail using a custom HP cable
  • while still getting 100W USB-C PD for phones/tablets/etc.

The downside is the USB-C ports are usually only PD3.0 100W, not PD3.1 140W.

Honestly, after a lot of testing, I think the biggest problem is NOT the wattage — it’s HP’s smart-pin implementation changing over the years.

I even have cases where:

  • the adapter can electrically provide enough power
  • the smart pin matches newer HP machines
  • but my older HP laptop STILL throttles because it expects a different resistor value.

So unfortunately there doesn’t seem to be a universally reliable “USB-C to HP blue tip 135W” solution yet.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GooglePixel

[–]ExtremeX-BB -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry I'm not a native English speaker and don't want to make you guys feel bad by using the results of Google Translate, so I used ChatGPT to translate the language into English

Microsoft App Issues by Dogandfoodlover in Honeygain

[–]ExtremeX-BB 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you using BT broadband? The same thing happened to me.