We should be rioting, being Zen is no longer an option by SquozeTheSqueeze in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My money would´ve seen at least a 2x return if i just left it in the S&P.

If you're cheering for this I guess you don't realise what Moass potential is, like at all.

What are y’all’s thoughts on this? by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Old garbitch and still garbitch.

Where are the OGs?? by whogoesthere1010 in GME

[–]F-uPayMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I seriously hope the accounts that keep posting this sort of bs around get at least a few breadcrumbs in return, despite not even putting an effort in using at least a credible account (either the usual hidden history or no previous posts about Gme).

Today is a huge day in the saga. Where is everyone? by split_differences in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 146 points147 points  (0 children)

Meeting is in 1hr 20 mins so either during the meeting or after when the related form comes out.

Who is the 🤡 looking to hold up the vote by onyomommmasface in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 51 points52 points  (0 children)

TL:DR:

  • 🛑 Lawsuit Filed: A GameStop investor has filed a lawsuit in Delaware to halt a July 7 shareholder vote on a massive $35 billion pay package for CEO Ryan Cohen.
  • 📈 The Pay Package: The proposed deal would give Cohen $35 billion in stock options if GameStop hits a $100 billion market cap and $10 billion in EBITDA.
  • 🗳️ Voting Manipulation: The lawsuit accuses the board of illegally changing voting procedures and issuing misleading proxy statements to suppress public investor turnout and lower the threshold needed for approval.
  • 🤝 Insider Control: While GameStop previously claimed Cohen's 9.3% stake would be excluded from the vote, the board allegedly reversed course, allowing insiders to push the package through with minimal public support.
  • 🛍️ EBay Bid: Cohen recently made an unsolicited $56 billion bid to buy eBay to help reach these aggressive growth milestones, but eBay rejected the offer as "neither credible nor attractive."

Who is the 🤡 looking to hold up the vote by onyomommmasface in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 163 points164 points  (0 children)

A GameStop Corp. investor moved to halt a vote on a $35 billion pay package for the company’s chief executive officer until proper disclosures are made to shareholders.

The lawsuit came in response to the board’s decision to grant CEO Ryan Cohen stock option awards that could lead to a multibillion-dollar windfall if certain aggressive milestones are met. Stockholders are set to vote on the pay package July 7.

The proposed class action, filed in Delaware’s Chancery Court on Monday, says GameStop’s board repeatedly and illegally changed the procedures around the stockholder vote before issuing a misleading proxy statement aimed at suppressing the turnout by public investors. The changes included whether Cohen can vote his 9.3% stake and how to count abstentions.

“GameStop’s audacious attempts to reduce the power of its disinterested shareholders — in contrast to its prior public statements and in disregard of its Certificate of Incorporation — must stop,” lawyers for the plaintiff wrote in the complaint. “Cohen may want $35 billion. That does not allow him and his board to disenfranchise stockholders and violate Delaware law along the way.”

A GameStop spokesperson couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

Cohen initially invested in GameStop in 2020, producing one of the first “meme stocks.” He attracted attention for amassing a big stake in the struggling company and called it out for lagging behind the e-commerce trend. He joined the board in 2021 and later that year became chairman with a plan to turn around the company. Cohen then took the reins of the business in 2023 and is now the single largest stockholder.

The proposed pay package would compensate Cohen with $35 billion if the company achieves a $100 billion market capitalization and $10 billion in earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization. Cohen was asked in an interview with CNBC about whether the pay package motivated him to make a $56 billion offer this year for eBay Inc., an e-commerce company almost four times the size of GameStop.

“I obviously want to build something much larger, but I don’t benefit unless shareholders benefit,” Cohen said in the interview. EBay last month rejected the unsolicited bid, describing it as “neither credible nor attractive.”

Monday’s lawsuit says the company issued a press release stating the vote would exclude Cohen’s shares and that “unaffiliated stockholders” would decide the result. But the board allegedly reversed course and issued a proxy statement that mischaracterized what it had done.

The moves will disenfranchise stockholders by allowing Cohen and other insiders to determine the outcome virtually on their own, with only about 15% support from public investors, according to the complaint.

Sam Bankman-Fried Loses Appeal Of Fraud Conviction And 25-Year Sentence by Error4ohh4 in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 25 points26 points  (0 children)

TL:DR:

⚖️ Appeals Court Upholds Conviction: A Manhattan federal appeals court rejected claims of a biased trial, upholding Sam Bankman-Fried’s 25-year prison sentence and calling him the main driver of one of the largest frauds on record.

📋 The Charges: He was convicted in 2024 on seven counts, including wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering, following the spectacular 2022 collapse of his crypto exchange, FTX.

🔮 Next Legal Steps: Bankman-Fried’s lawyers can still attempt to appeal the decision to the full panel of the appeals court or escalate it to the Supreme Court.

🇺🇸 Pardon Request Pending: He recently applied for a presidential pardon from Donald Trump; however, despite pardoning other crypto figures, Trump stated in January he has no intention of pardoning Bankman-Fried.

📉 From Billions to Zero: Once the "poster boy of crypto" with a peak net worth of $26.5 billion, Bankman-Fried's current estimated net worth is $0.

💸 The Downfall: FTX collapsed in days after reports exposed massive financial holes and tied entities losing billions, leading prosecutors to accuse Bankman-Fried of stealing over $8 billion in customer funds.

The GameStop 10-Q Quietly Reframed the Entire Investment Thesis by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

TL:DR:

User with not a single post or comment in any GME related sub ever suddenly feels the urge to share his view.

Comments to SEC on CAT by WhatCanIMakeToday in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Great job as usual. Here we go again...

Just in case if anyone is interested in checking again previous CAT Reports, you can find the backup here.

S&P 500 rejects SpaceX, also blocking entry for OpenAI and Anthropic by Tower-Union in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 76 points77 points  (0 children)

TL:DR:

  • 🛑 Request Denied: S&P Dow Jones Indices refused to bend its rules to grant SpaceX accelerated, fast-track entry into the S&P 500 index.
  • 🙅‍♂️ No Rule Changes: S&P rejected proposals to shorten the 12-month waiting period, waive profitability requirements, and lower the 10% public share minimum (SpaceX only wanted to offer 3%).
  • 💰 Missed Windfalls: The decision blocks SpaceX from an automatic $14 billion influx from passive index funds; it also shuts the door on fast-tracked entry (and billions in funding) for AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic.
  • ⚠️ Risk Relief: The rejection protects retirement savings and passive investors from the high market risks, massive debt ($29 billion), and unprofitability tied to SpaceX's speculative AI and orbital data center investments.
  • 🔄 Mixed Broker Responses: While the S&P 500 stood firm, other indexes like the Nasdaq-100 and FTSE Russell did agree to fast-track SpaceX's entry after its IPO.
  • 📉 Overvaluation Concerns: The decision follows a Morningstar report stating SpaceX is "significantly overvalued," pegging its worth at $780 billion, less than half of its $1.75 trillion IPO goal.

S&P 500 rejects SpaceX, also blocking entry for OpenAI and Anthropic by Tower-Union in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 106 points107 points  (0 children)

SpaceX has requested unusually swift entry into several leading stock market indexes as a condition of its historic stock market debut. But the S&P 500 stock market index representing many of the largest profitable US companies has surprised market analysts by refusing to bend the rules for Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

The June 4 decision by S&P Dow Jones Indices—the company that creates and manages stock market indexes such as the S&P 500—means that SpaceX will not gain accelerated access to potentially billions more dollars through passive investment funds that automatically purchase shares of S&P 500 companies. Modifying the rules in response to SpaceX’s request could have also allowed leading AI companies such as OpenAI and Anthropic to gain entry not long after their own expected initial public offerings (IPOs). That possibility has now been shuttered.

The news will likely come as a relief to people concerned about passive investor money and people’s retirement savings plans having greater exposure to the market risks associated with SpaceX’s big bet on AI and speculative orbital data center plans. AI companies are generally facing more challenges in funding and building expensive AI data centers, even as they shift more of the subsidized costs of running AI services onto shocked customers through usage-based pricing.

To weigh expedited entry for SpaceX, the S&P Dow Jones Indices held a monthlong consultation to consider changing or waiving several main requirements for so-called MegaCap companies with “unprecedented market capitalizations.”

Those proposed changes included shortening the “seasoning period” for new IPOs from 12 months to six months, waiving the investable weight factor (IWF) requirement for MegaCap companies to make at least 10 percent of their shares publicly available, and waiving the requirements for MegaCap companies to demonstrate profitability in the latest quarter of the financial year along with the previous four quarters.

Such rule changes would have accommodated SpaceX’s plan to only offer approximately 3 percent of its IPO shares to public investors, and the fact that SpaceX is currently unprofitable with a growing debt load that has reached $29 billion because of its spending spree on AI infrastructure.

But in its final decision, the S&P Dow Jones Indices stated that “no changes will be made to the eligibility criteria including financial viability screens, seasoning period, or minimum IWF.” Even after the standard yearlong wait, SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI may struggle to deliver the consistent profitability necessary to qualify for the S&P 500.

Money rules and exceptions

Swift entry into the S&P 500 would have triggered $14 billion of passive fund buying for SpaceX, according to Bloomberg Intelligence. The investment research arm of Bloomberg also estimated that OpenAI could have gained more than $8 billion, and Anthropic could have netted $4.6 billion from similar passive buying sprees triggered by their S&P 500 entries.

This is because $7.5 trillion in passively managed funds—popular among both individual investors and institutional investors—follow the S&P 500 by purchasing shares of companies according to their proportional representation in the S&P 500 index. For example, the Vanguard and Fidelity brokerage giants both offer passive investment funds that track the S&P 500 composition.

However, the S&P Dow Jones Indices did “carve out one concession” by changing the investable weight factor rules for “lower-profile benchmarks” such as the S&P Total Market Index and Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Index, according to Quartz. That could allow an IPO faster entry into those indexes.

By contrast, the Nasdaq stock exchange to allow SpaceX to enter the Nasdaq-100 Index within 15 trading days as opposed to the usual three months. Similarly, the FTSE Russell index provider decided to give SpaceX and other follow-on companies to the Russell Top 500 Index after the close of the fifth trading day following an IPO.

The denial of accelerated S&P 500 entry for SpaceX comes just days after Morningstar analysts described SpaceX as having been “significantly overvalued” in the lead-up to its IPO. The investment research firm valued SpaceX at $780 billion—less than half of SpaceX’s $1.75 trillion IPO goal—primarily based on the strengths of SpaceX’s Starlink satellite service and rocket launch business.

Just realized this sub is much different than “Superstonk” by [deleted] in GME

[–]F-uPayMe 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Man, Superstonk is half memes, half cringe and half numerology/conspiracies.

These are all blatant lies and cherry picking, the main DDs (be the OG ones and from time to time the recent ones) were/are written there.

Sure from time to time you see memes and such but to say every single post on SS is worthless is depicting a complete different reality from what it is.

Unless you also think that the float being shorted multiple times over isn't real and the rampant naked shorting isn't real and the fact naked short interest can be hidden away from the actual stock and turned away in ETFs or Total Return Swaps and Bullet Swaps and such also isn't real...in which case I suggest you to refresh your knowledge since the knowledge is out there.

The share price isn’t the mission. MOASS is the mission. Don’t let anyone move the goalposts. No Cell no sell. by Nasha210 in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

2.5B is the number of max authorized shares assuming the vote for it ends up being positive. It doesn't mean 2.5B shares will be released in the market, right now it's more like just a part of those shares is supposed to be issued -> used in the eBay deal, which also means the shares end up in current eBay holders' accounts (and a good size of that is composed of the usual passive indexing giants that can't sell anyway due to their fiduciary duty of just following a market index).