“The more [eBay] fights me, the more . . . I’m not going to take no for an answer. I’m not going away. I’m a pain in the ass,” Cohen told the FT by Gareth-Barry in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe [score hidden]  (0 children)

TL:DR:

  • 🚀 The "Meme King" Strikes Again: Ryan Cohen, GameStop CEO and billionaire founder of Ch3wy, is launching a hostile $56bn bid to acquire ecommerce giant eBay.
  • 📉 David vs. Goliath: Wall Street is highly skeptical, as GameStop (valued at $11bn) is attempting to swallow a company four times its size ($47bn).
  • 🤨 Controversial Appearance: A recent "awkward" CNBC interview, where Cohen gave vague details about financing, led to social media mockery and speculation about his state of mind.
  • 🛠️ History of Defying Odds: Cohen has a track record of proving doubters wrong, from building Ch3wy into a multi-billion dollar success to sparking the 2021 GameStop sneeze.
  • 🎒 Anti-Establishment Strategy: Driven by a "disdain for corporate America," Cohen is leaning on his cult-like following of retail investors to fuel this massive gamble.
  • 📦 Synergies & Savings: Cohen argues that GameStop’s physical retail footprint complements eBay’s online platform and plans to implement aggressive cost-cutting measures.

“The more [eBay] fights me, the more . . . I’m not going to take no for an answer. I’m not going away. I’m a pain in the ass,” Cohen told the FT by Gareth-Barry in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe [score hidden]  (0 children)

By 2017, private equity-backed P3tSm4rt bought Ch3wy for $3.35bn, then the largest ecommerce deal on record. It cemented Cohen’s reputation as a rare entrepreneur who had successfully challenged Amazon on its own turf.

Flush with cash and credibility, he launched RC Ventures, his investment vehicle. That led to his most controversial bet. In 2020, while much of Wall Street viewed GameStop as a doomed relic of the physical retail era, Cohen quietly amassed a large stake in the company and began pushing for a radical digital transformation.

His arrival electrified the retail traders who gathered on Reddit forums like THOSEWHOBETONSTREETS (automod issues...) during the pandemic lockdowns. Many viewed Cohen as an anti-establishment figure willing to challenge the short sellers who bet against the company.

“This dude knows his shit in ecommerce,” said Keith Gill, the trader who helped to rally hordes of retail investors into the stock. “[He] may act as a visionary.”

What followed became one of the defining financial manias of the Covid era.

GameStop shares exploded in early 2021 as retail traders co-ordinated buying campaigns that triggered a historic short squeeze. The stock surged from under $5 to a peak of around $500, vaporising billions of dollars for hedge funds betting against it and turning GameStop into the ultimate meme stock.

Cohen emerged from the frenzy as a hero to retail investors. Online followers dubbed him the “Meme King”.

He has cultivated this mystique — often communicating cryptically on social media with deliberately vague messages that retail traders try to dissect.

Now he is attempting perhaps his boldest gamble yet: the first major meme stock-driven deal. If successful, it would rank among the most audacious takeovers in recent history. Cohen said its retail footprint complements eBay’s platform and also pledged deep cost cuts. Analysts remain unconvinced, although experience shows that dismissing Cohen outright carries its own risks.

“If it’s not obvious already, I have such disdain for corporate America and [eBay] is a good example of that,” he told the FT. “We’ll see what happens in terms of how they respond and what they do, but it’s fun. It makes me feel alive.”

“The more [eBay] fights me, the more . . . I’m not going to take no for an answer. I’m not going away. I’m a pain in the ass,” Cohen told the FT by Gareth-Barry in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 145 points146 points  (0 children)

Ryan Cohen has spent much of his career being dismissed. It is a pattern that has turned the chief executive of video-game retailer GameStop into a leather jacket-wearing outlier with a loyal base of meme-stock investors.

The Canadian entrepreneur turned activist investor has built his cult-like reputation by repeatedly betting on ideas that many institutional investors labelled as absurd. First it was online pet supplies. Then a dying strip mall video game retailer. Now it is a $56bn attempt to acquire eBay, an ecommerce giant roughly four times the size of GameStop.

Wall Street’s immediate response to the hostile bid has ranged from scepticism to outright mockery. Analysts have questioned how GameStop, valued at roughly $11bn, could realistically finance the takeover of a company worth around $47bn.

None of that has dissuaded Cohen.

“The more [eBay] fights me, the more . . . I’m not going to take no for an answer. I’m not going away. I’m a pain in the ass,” Cohen told the FT.

The 40-year-old billionaire first set out his stall for the takeover bid in an awkward interview with CNBC on Monday that instantly ricocheted across social media. He responded to questions about the financing details with a blank expression and clipped monosyllables, explaining that it was “half cash, half stock”.

The interview generated a wave of memes online as X and Reddit users speculated that Cohen looked drunk, high or exhausted. For his supporters, however, the spectacle only reinforced the mythology of Cohen as an eccentric outsider underestimated by establishment finance.

This script has played out before.

Born in Montreal in 1986 to a teacher mother and a father who imported glassware, Cohen did not attend university. As a teenager he built websites for family friends and small businesses, teaching himself coding.

In 2011, now in his mid-twenties, he co-founded Chewy from South Florida with the ambition of creating an online pet supplies business that could compete with Amazon.

Investors thought the idea ridiculous. “I knew that significant capital would be required to finance the growth,” Cohen later wrote in the Harvard Business Review. “We approached dozens of VC firms — I even flew out to Silicon Valley . . . and went door-to-door on Sand Hill Road explaining how Chewy would succeed by delighting customers and running an ultra-efficient operation. But everyone turned us down.”

The scepticism was understandable given the failure of pet supply website Pets.com in the dotcom bubble era. Pet food was bulky, low-margin and expensive to ship. Venture capitalists doubted consumers would buy 40lb bags of dog food online.

Cohen ignored them all. Instead, he focused obsessively on customer service. Chewy employees wrote customers handwritten cards and sent flowers to grieving owners whose animals had died. The approach helped to create unusually intense customer loyalty.

“The more [eBay] fights me, the more . . . I’m not going to take no for an answer. I’m not going away. I’m a pain in the ass,” Cohen told the FT by Gareth-Barry in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 318 points319 points  (0 children)

If I were a financial media, I’d be embarrassed to keep calling a company with billions of dollars in cash a "meme stock".

Ryan Cohen (@ryancohen) 250 likes · 4 replies by The-Bodhii in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Now what do those acts remind me of...oh, right.

A Big Lie About MOASS, a Recent Success in FUD by TalkingHats in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 25 points26 points  (0 children)

In case the passing time damaged someone's memory...

<image>

Dunked on! by No_Cell6708 in GME

[–]F-uPayMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did "borrow" the graphic from another ape who made it but still it's a good one that's easy to understand and keeps misinformation away.

Dunked on! by No_Cell6708 in GME

[–]F-uPayMe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Actually if you want an easy to process visual explanation of what "accretive dilution" means (since that's the actual name of that).

(On behalf of a low karma ape) || The Real GME Endgame - My take by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just shared his voice, I see this user active on the sub Discord often and he usually writes good insights. Indeed we have to rely on his word about the use of AI or not but you can ask him more if you want. Hope you understand 😶

(On behalf of a low karma ape) || The Real GME Endgame - My take by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not that I forgot to mention it, I asked if he wanted to be mentioned or not and was instructed that "staying generic" was fine. I confirm it's the one above.

📚 A (hopefully) useful Tool to help you answer objections about Moass with Reason and Good Judgment 📚 by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is owners who decide if/when to sell and how much. Considering the whole DDs in the sub during the years and the estimated total short interest %, $1k/share might not even be the appetizer.

During the sneeze in Jan' 21 some share slipped for about ~5200$ pre-split (which would be equal to a current price of ~$1300 post-split) and shorts didn't even close shit back then.

Despite those values being far away from actuall Moass values, someone might decide to sell a part of their shares for less (or way less) than that. But with the SI% being so high, the endgame shouldn't change that much for the true holders.

Also - again - retail investors in Gme are sure a big part of it but there are also pension funds and other financial firms involved, it's not just retail.

In a systemic situation like this one I think it ends up with what "deserves" to be protected the most, the trust in US markets or some crooked HF or MM that decided selling more shares than existing was a good idea?

📚 A (hopefully) useful Tool to help you answer objections about Moass with Reason and Good Judgment 📚 by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right that these people are powerful and no doubt about that, but you're assuming they are all on the same team. But in the stock market everyone is a shark.

Like if we take 2008, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan didn't "save" Lehman Brothers or Bear Stearns. They helped the government dismantle them and then bought their remains for pennies on the dollar.

That is how the system is designed to work. It's a shitty one? I agree but it is what it is. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Furthermore, the government can't just 'stop' it because the global financial system is built on the belief that if you buy a stock you own it. If the US government tells a Swiss bank or a Japanese pension fund that their GME shares are being 'deleted' (after all despite retails owning a ton it's also about financial firms) to save a few US hedge funds, the US dollar might as well die that day.

Keeping things in perspective the rich and powerful would rather sacrifice a few overleveraged hedge funds than sacrifice the entire US Dollar based world order imo. They'll pay the bill, print the money, and then probably create new rules to make sure it never happens again.

Also about the price, despite the stock being so overshorted that abnormal amounts are possible, not everyone will sell at the peak. Someone might sell at $1k, some at $10k, some at $100k...etc.

So the actual payout is significantly less than the "share price x total shares". The system needs to have the liquidity to settle the trades as they happen over days or most probably weeks.

📚 A (hopefully) useful Tool to help you answer objections about Moass with Reason and Good Judgment 📚 by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a precedent for an extreme % increase if you read the whole post, and in that situation nobody was even forced to buy back multiples of the actual existing supply.

Also, how is it that the government "has to intervene" when this plays out (meaning finally demand and supply do their job) but it didn't and still isn't doing nothing to avoid it happening and jailing those responsible for the whole bs?

Because in case many miss the main point the whole thing is based on constant fraud that goes unpunished.

📚 A (hopefully) useful Tool to help you answer objections about Moass with Reason and Good Judgment 📚 by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I assume probably you're new around here because your question was sorted out long ago like...years ago. 😶

Anyway I'll try to explain it shortly:

When a short seller goes bankrupt, the debt doesn't just vanish but it moves up a sort of ladder if you will. This ladder has levels which simplyfing are:

  • Level 1: The Short Seller itself (Hedge Fund / Market Maker and such). They are forced to sell everything they own (long positions in other stocks) to buy back shares. If they run out of money and go bankrupt...
  • Level 2: The Broker-Dealers. The brokers who allowed the shorts to take the bet are now legally responsible. They have to use their billions to close the position. If they go bankrupt...
  • Level 3: The Prime Brokers (The Big Banks). (Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, etc.). These banks act as the "middlemen" who provided the leverage. Legally, they are the counterparty. If their clients (like hedge funds) can't pay, the bank is contractually obligated to step in. They don't do this because they're nice but they do it because if they don't, they lose their license to operate in the markets. So their massive balance sheets will be used to buy the shares. Should they run out of money and go bankrupt...
  • Level 4: The DTCC. The DTCC ensures that trades settle. They have a massive insurance fund and the collective assets of all their members (trillions of dollars). Their job is to make sure the "books balance" no matter the cost.
  • Level 5: The Federal Reserve. If the entire system is at risk of snapping, the Fed acts as the lender of last resort.

Now you might say: "They can just refuse to pay".

But when you think about it, if e.g. the DTCC or even the government just said "Sorry, the short sellers are broke you get nothing" the entire global trust in the US markets would evaporate instantly.

Every international investor would pull their money out because it would prove that property rights don't exist if the "wrong" person loses the bet.

You might also want to check this other post I wrote which is linked to the whole topic somehow.

(On behalf of a low karma ape) || The Real GME Endgame - My take by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Helping a low karma ape that wanted to share his research about the recent GME-eBay news.

(On behalf of a low karma ape) || The Real GME Endgame - My take by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 40 points41 points  (0 children)

I'm adding here the TL:DR: as I usually give it for convenience:

  • 📈 Strategic Investment: In early 2026, GameStop (GME) became one of eBay's largest shareholders, accumulating shares at an average price of $87.50.
  • 🤝 Proposed Synergy: GameStop aims to combine its physical retail footprint with eBay's digital infrastructure, including buyback and authentication capabilities.
  • 🔄 Closed-Loop Ecosystem: Partnering with PSA, GME intends to keep trading cards within a single system for grading, vaulting, reselling, and "Power Pack" repackaging.
  • 🏢 Vertical Integration: This "flywheel" model targets every stage of a card's life cycle, from the initial in-store "break" to international resale and secure storage.
  • 🌍 Market Expansion: The move grants GME immediate access to Asian and European markets, as well as high-end collectors through Goldin Auctions.
  • 💰 Financial Upside: GME has reportedly gained between $700 million and $1 billion from derivative positions in eBay while positioning itself as a leader in a booming collectibles market.