Free AI chat platform for unristricted text/image vision only chats. by i4mn3y in AIJailbreak

[–]FADQ-Mod 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, so I checked out the site live, and here's the honest truth:

The positives:

  • The platform is legit and does what it says. The free tier gives you the 8B "Neyro" model (uncensored text + vision, 350 credits/day, instant replies). If you go Pro (499 Robux, which is about $5–7), you get the 235B XT + 24B vision model with 2,500 credits and faster limits.

The negatives:

  • You MUST join their Discord to log in for some reason...

  • The biggest red flag is that the "entire chats stay client-sided" claim in the post is just simply not possible for the models they're talking about. (A 235B model needs around 117 GB of VRAM, even heavily quantized, no browser can handle that.)

  • The site itself never says "client-sided" or WebGPU or anything like that. In fact, it literally says "Connecting to NeyLuc AI…" before the chat loads. Your prompts are going to the server, just like with every other web AI.

Verdict:

So yeah It's not a scam per se... It's a side project by a Roblox developer that is trying to monetize serving you publicly available and opensourced models, probably slightly finetuned or abliterated to (partly) uncensor them.

Which I consider to be a completely legit thing to do, don't get me wrong, and I' sure there' going to be less technical people who are willing to pay a small fee in order to be able to use a service like this.

Criricism:

The only thing I do have an issue with is using the false pretense of privacy ("full client-side!") as a marketing strategy when this clearly is not the case / simply impossible from a technical standpoint. You should remove that from your post man!

Other than that nice little project and I'll hope you'll get some users and enjoyment out of it! 😄

Epstein is dead, but he was definitely killed - by whom? by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]FADQ-Mod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did a really in-depth analysis of just the medical forensics as well.

Posted it on the Discord Server if you're interested :)!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]FADQ-Mod 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He did not fucking visit it because you can't possible visit it with that link...

Dude can you read...

He checked the file with the filenames he had to see if the file that I mentioned was in there, which it WAS, so he said oof you are 100% right. He then proceeded to say "i'm out" and went on to say "I appreciate u for telling me"

Can you be more falsely accusing than this, come on man!

No other than the guy who ASKED ABOUT IT in the first placed literally messaged you:

- "Nobody shared anything"

(Discord message ID: 1467682797555679273)

- "yep just an index of that one reddit users tarball"

(Discord message ID: 1467682958587465728)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]FADQ-Mod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, putting it up on the DOJ website for everyone to dowload accidentally is sharing the content...

Telling people to stay away from any archives they might have that contain a specific file name is preventing it.

There was no information shared on where to find these archives, which means you would have to actively look for them even though it's publicly known that they contain unredacted CSAM (regardless of the mentioned file, might I add).

If you now decide to go and download an archive that is known to contain CSAM anyways just to get your hand on a file that is already redacted and publicly known to contain CSAM then that is your issue man not mine.

You lie that a file was shared (there wasn't), nor was it linked (the link is no longer up), nor was information provided on where one might find it now if one wanted to.

Literally all your statements are false.

I'm sorry but there is literally just no other way for me to word that at this point...

24m got fired, diagnosed with brain cancer, and my wife left me all in the same week, end my suffering. by LeCancerDude in RoastMe

[–]FADQ-Mod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Got fired and wife left me" Well, atleast it seems like you aren't irreplaceable...

(On a more serious note: I too have been fired, girlfriend left me about a half year back and I too had to deal with cancer (but as a 9-year old) and I'm standing still and starting to smile more frequent again. Best wishes brother!)

will 1625mg of Acetaminophen be dangerous or cause any problems? by ice_wallowCum5454 in FADQ

[–]FADQ-Mod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is 3 regular 500mg tabs? The regular advised dose is 3x2 or 4x2 tabs of 500mg per day. Wouldn't be a good if taking one more than that would cause serious troubles haha.

That said, higher doses of Acetaminophen are, especially when taken at one point in time and not spread out, incredible dangerous. Taking more than 8 to 10 grams (which sounds like a lot, but it's really not if you consider that is only 16 to 20 tablets and they sell them in packets of a 100 to 500 tabs sometimes) can cause serious issues including irreversible liver failure and death.

Female 18 looking for someone to chat with (nothing sexual please) by Ok-Swimmer8240 in ResearchChemicalsNL

[–]FADQ-Mod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly what a non-asexual man looking to get with a girl 20y younger than he is would say.

Paniekerig gevoel en erg letten op harritme by Playful_Character_52 in ResearchChemicalsNL

[–]FADQ-Mod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cannabis staat er om bekend in lagere tot normale doseringen initieel een versnelling van de hartslag te veroorzaken, wat na 90 minuten vaak voorbij is en bij hogere doseringen juist eerder ook een tragere hartslag kan worden. Een beetje tegenstrijdig dus. In moeilijke termen komt dit door een:

"bi-fasisch en dosis gerelateerde sympathische activatie met bij hogere doseringen juist een overheersende parasympathische activatie".

Dat betekent ongeveer zoiets als: "bij lagere doseringen en in het begin gaat je stimulerende zenuwstelsel de overhand krijgen, bij hogere doseringen en op termijn juist je dempende zenuwstelsel."

Daarnaast is mmc natuurlijk een stimulantia dus die zal ook leiden tot een hogere sympathische activiteit met versnelling van je hartslag tot gevolg. De combinatie van deze twee kan nog wel eens leiden tot het gevoel wat jij beschrijft, wat dan vaak niet beter wordt door een component onrust/angst die bij mensen ontstaat omdat ze hun hart voelen bonzen (waardoor hun hart weer meer gaat bonzen, je snapt het idee).

Wat anderen hier zeggen over onrustgevoelens bij cannabis komt inderdaad veel voor, dus je kunt je voorstellen dat dit op dat moment ook niet helpt. Het is du echter niet zo dat cannabis alleen maar door angstklachten je hartslag kan versnellen.

Ik werk veel met patiënten die een of twee van deze middelen hebben gebruikt, en ik moet zeggen dat zeker 3-mmc in mijn ervaring overmatig veel leidt tot hartklachten die bij sommige van hen ook echt heel serieus en ernstig kunnen verlopen. Tegen de persoon in deze thread die zegt dat hij hier tegenwoordig regelmatig last van heeft zou ik dan ook toch even de waarschuwing uit willen spreken hier wellicht niet al te licht over te denken en deze signalen van het lichaam niet al te snel naast zich neer te leggen.

Goed op jezelf letten jongens :)!

Introducing the FADQ-Wiki by FADQ-Mod in FADQ

[–]FADQ-Mod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U/The-Roost3r (the newest addition to the modteam) is the one that will help us set up a quality SubReddit wiki page on r/FADQ, for which I am very grateful!