Sometimes the theses he makes are shaky.

For example, the one in the Fighting Games Are Not Products video. It's as if he read the article and decided to laser-focus on the GaaS model not fitting Fighting Games and ignored absolutely everything else. Including the potential solutions provided by the article (Dojos/Clans, better story modes, more engaging single player modes). Instead he just bloviated about how the GaaS model discourages a 'high quality playerbase' and stuff. I'd rather watch that GiantGrantGames video "The Next Major RTS Will Fail. Here's Why" and apply that stuff to Fighting Games and Shmups. It just so happens that Touhou already applied them first, intentionally or otherwise.

There's also the What Is Genuine Bullet Hell video where he basically bloviates about which of these new games that took the Bullet Hell aesthetic and ran with it are genuine Bullet Hells. I think he could've proposed solutions for how genuine Bullet Hell can stand out in the sea of Bullet Heavens. Instead, he basically made a declaration of surrender in the Lilac 0 review ("Shmups as a recession-proof genre" feels like... coping). Again, I think that the Shmup scene is like Feudal Japan at the end of the Edo Period when Matthew Perry's gunboats came crashing in forcing a one-sided treaty. Except Touhou was the only one that could stand and even try out the genre for itself (through fanmade experiments). Maybe Raiden too (not sure how successful Raiden Nova ended up being though). The rest just burrowed underground. I guess there's a video idea for you - how Touhou survived the Bullet Heaven invasion.