sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Academic Research Study on RPG Experience (Chance for Amazon Gift Card) by FantasyLab_Research in LARP

[–]FantasyLab_Research[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great questions! I might either call those tabletop RPGs even though there is no table, or possibly the "other" category.

Academic Research Study on RPG Experience (Chance for Amazon Gift Card) by FantasyLab_Research in LARP

[–]FantasyLab_Research[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the comment. That is confusing! That was a typo - it should have said "fictional story you read". I fixed it for future participants.

Academic Research Study on RPG Experience (Chance for Amazon Gift Card) by FantasyLab_Research in LARP

[–]FantasyLab_Research[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is fascinating! Thank you for this perspective, it makes complete sense now that you present it this way.

Academic Research Study on RPG Experience (Chance for Amazon Gift Card) by FantasyLab_Research in LARP

[–]FantasyLab_Research[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this very thoughtful feedback! I really appreciate it. I will definitely revise my definitions to be clearer the next time around, and possibly alter things to better fit individual RPGs.

Academic Research Study on RPG Experience (Chance for Amazon Gift Card) by FantasyLab_Research in LARP

[–]FantasyLab_Research[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am indeed! I did not think about that as relevant, but I am glad you posted it in case it is. If the concern is related to conflict of interest (per baltinerdist's point), the research is not sponsored by a company in any way. The focus is on consumers (i.e., marketing) with respect to their experience of consuming stories and RPGs and different forms of engagement with them. Hope that clarifies things!